Normalizing for Differences in Muscle Size and Strength Does Not Eliminate Differences in Muscle Power or Acceleration Between Pre- and Post-Pubescent Males and Females

Zachary M. Gillen , Marni E. Shoemaker , Joel T. Cramer

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -12.

PDF
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› :1 -12. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-024-00319-3
Original Article

Normalizing for Differences in Muscle Size and Strength Does Not Eliminate Differences in Muscle Power or Acceleration Between Pre- and Post-Pubescent Males and Females

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared absolute and relative measurements of peak torque (PT), mean power (MP), and rate of velocity development (RVD) during isometric and isokinetic elbow flexion muscle actions in pre- and post-pubescent males and females.

Methods

Forty children participated (pre-pubescent: mean ± 95% confidence interval age = 9.79 ± 0.35 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females; post-pubescent: 17.23 ± 0.58 years, n = 10 males, n = 10 females). Ultrasound images quantified muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the elbow flexors. Participants completed maximal elbow flexion muscle actions at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300°/s.

Results

As expected, the post-pubescent group achieved greater absolute measures of PT, MP, and RVD at all velocities (P ≤ 0.015). When normalized to CSA and strength, differences in PT were mostly eliminated (P ≥ 0.136), but differences in MP and RVD remained (P ≤ 0.012).

Conclusion

The post-pubescent groups maintained greater MP and RVD at each movement velocity, suggesting that muscle size and strength cannot fully account for age-related differences in time-dependent measurements of muscle performance, such as power and acceleration. Instead, these performance indicators may be related to neuromuscular adaptations during normal growth, development, and biological maturation processes, such as augmentations in motor unit recruitment strategies and increases in action potential conduction velocities.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zachary M. Gillen, Marni E. Shoemaker, Joel T. Cramer. Normalizing for Differences in Muscle Size and Strength Does Not Eliminate Differences in Muscle Power or Acceleration Between Pre- and Post-Pubescent Males and Females. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 1-12 DOI:10.1007/s42978-024-00319-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Asai H, Aoki J. Force development of dynamic and static contractions in children and adults. Int J Sports Med, 1996, 17(3): 170-174

[2]

Barrett U, Harrison D. Comparing muscle function of children and adults: effects of scaling for muscle size. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2002, 14(4): 369-376

[3]

Bergeron M, Mountjoy M, Armstrong N, Chia M, Côté J, Emery CA, Faigenbaum A, Hall G Jr Kriemler S, Léglise M, Malina RM, Pensgaard AM, Sanchez A, Soligard T, Sanchez A, Sundgot-Borgen J, van Mechelen W, Weissensteiner JR, Engebretsen L. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. Br J Sports Med, 2015, 49(13): 843-851

[4]

Brown L, Whitehurst M, Findley B. Reliability of rate of velocity development and phase measures on an isokinetic device. J Strength Cond Res, 2005, 19(1): 189-192

[5]

Brown L, Whitehurst M, Findley B, Gilbert R, Buchalter DN. Isokinetic load range during shoulder rotation exercise in elite male junior tennis players. J Strength Cond Res, 1995, 9(3): 160-164

[6]

Chalchat E, Piponnier E, Bontemps B, Julian V, Bocock O, Duclos M, Ratel S, Martin V. Characteristics of motor unit recruitment in boys and men at maximal and submaximal force levels. Exp Brain Res, 2019, 237(5): 1289-1302

[7]

Cramer JT, Housh TJ, Weir JP, Johnson JP, Berning JM, Perry SR, Bull AJ. Gender, muscle, and velocity comparisons of mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during isokinetic muscle actions. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2004, 14(2): 116-127

[8]

Cramer JT, Jenkins NDM, Mustad VA, Weir JP. Isokinetic dynamometry in healthy versus sarcopenic and malnourished elderly: beyond simple measurements of muscle strength. J Appl Gerontol, 2017, 36(6): 709-732

[9]

Dotan R, Mitchell C, Cohen R, Gabriel D, Klentrou P, Falk B. Child–adult differences in the kinetics of torque development. J Sports Sci, 2013, 31(9): 945-953

[10]

Faigenbaum AD, MacDonald JP. Dynapenia: it’s not just for grown-ups anymore. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(5): 696-697

[11]

Gillen ZM, Housh TJ, Schmidt RJ, Herda TJ, De Ayala R, Shoemaker ME, Cramer JT. Comparisons of muscle strength, size, and voluntary activation in pre- and post-pubescent males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2021, 121(9): 2487-2497

[12]

Gillen ZM, Housh TJ, Schmidt RJ, Herda T, De Ayala RJ, Shoemaker M, Cramer J. Differences in neuromuscular responses during isometric muscle actions before and after pubescence. J Sci Sport Exerc, 2024, 6(1): 22-34

[13]

Gillen ZM, McHugh MP, Shoemaker ME, Cramer JT. Comparisons of countermovement jump force profiles in youth athletes. Translat Sports Med, 2021, 4(5): 646-656

[14]

Gillen ZM, Shoemaker ME, Bohannon NA. Comparing the torque- and power-velocity relationships between children and adolescents during isokinetic leg extension muscle actions. Hum Mov Sci, 2020, 74: 102678

[15]

Gillen ZM, Shoemaker ME, Cramer JT. Electromyographic and mechanomyographic responses during isokinetic leg extensions in children versus adolescents. J Sci Sport Exerc, 2022, 5(3): 226-235

[16]

Gillen ZM, Shoemaker ME, McKay BD, et al.. Muscle strength, size, and neuromuscular function before and during adolescence. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2019, 119(7): 1619-1632

[17]

Gillen ZM, Shoemaker ME, McKay BD, Bohannon NA, Gibson SM, Cramer JT. Leg extension strength, explosive strength, muscle activation, and growth as predictors of vertical jump performance in youth athletes. J Sci Sport Exerc, 2020, 4(3): 336-348

[18]

Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioral sciences, Edition 10, 2017 Boston, MA Cengage Learning

[19]

Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959, 24: 95-112

[20]

Grosset JF, Mora I, Lambertz D, Pérot C. Voluntary activation of the triceps surae in prepubertal children. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2008, 18(3): 455-465

[21]

Gür H, Gransberg L, vanDyke D, Knutsson E, Larsson L. Relationship between in vivo muscle force at different speeds of isokinetic movements and myosin isoform expression in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2003, 88(6): 487-496

[22]

Herda TJ, Ryan ED, Kohlmeier M, Trevino MA, Gerstner GR, Roelofs EJ. Examination of muscle morphology and neuromuscular function in normal weight and overfat children aged 7–10 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2018, 28(11): 2310-2321

[23]

Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Housh DJ, Stout JR, Weir J, Weir LL, Eckerson J. Isokinetic peak torque in young wrestlers. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 1996, 8: 143-155

[24]

Jaric S, Mirkov D, Markovic G. Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: a proposal for standardization. J Strength Cond Res, 2005, 19(2): 467-474

[25]

Jenkins NDM, Housh TJ, Palmer TB, Cochrane KC, Bergstrom HC, Johnson GO, Schmidt RJ, Cramer JT. Relative differences in strength and power from slow to fast isokinetic velocities may reflect dynapenia. Muscle Nerve, 2015, 52(1): 120-130

[26]

Kanehisa H, Abe T, Fukunaga T. Growth trends of dynamic strength in adolescent boys. A 2-year follow-up survey. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2003, 43(4): 459-464

[27]

Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Tsunoda N, Fukunaga T. Strength and cross-sectional area of knee extensor muscles in children. Eur J Appl Physiol, 1994, 68(5): 402-405

[28]

Kluka V, Martin V, Vicencio SG, et al.. Effect of muscle length on voluntary activation level in children and adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2015, 47(4): 718-724

[29]

Koh TH, Eyre JA. Maturation of corticospinal tracts assessed by electromagnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Arch Dis Child, 1988, 63(11): 1347-1352

[30]

Lambertz D, Mora I, Grosset J-F, Pérot C. Evaluation of musculotendinous stiffness in prepubertal children and adults, taking into account muscle activity. J Appl Physiol, 2003, 95(1): 64-72

[31]

Lloyd R, Cronin J, Faigenbaum A, et al.. National strength and conditioning association position statement on long-term athletic development. J Strength Cond Res, 2016, 30(6): 1491-1509

[32]

Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Hughes MG, Williams CA. Age-related differences in the neural regulation of stretch–shortening cycle activities in male youths during maximal and sub-maximal hopping. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2012, 22(1): 37-43

[33]

Markovic G, Jaric S. Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2004, 92(1–2): 139-149

[34]

Miller JD, Sterczala AJ, Trevino MA, et al.. Motor unit action potential amplitudes and firing rates during repetitive muscle actions of the first dorsal interosseous in children and adults. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2019, 119(4): 1007-1018

[35]

Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2002, 34(4): 689-694

[36]

Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J: J Med Associat Malawi, 2012, 24(3): 69-71

[37]

O’Brien TD, Reeves ND, Baltzopoulos V, et al.. Strong relationships exist between muscle volume, joint power and whole-body external mechanical power in adults and children. Exp Physiol, 2009, 94(6): 731-738

[38]

O’Brien TD, Reeves ND, Baltzopoulos V, et al.. The effects of agonist and antagonist muscle activation on the knee extension moment–angle relationship in adults and children. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2009, 106(6): 849-856

[39]

O’Brien TD, Reeves ND, Baltzopoulos V, Jones DA. In vivo measurements of muscle specific tension in adults and children. Exp Physiol, 2010, 95(1): 202-210

[40]

Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR. Muscle force-velocity and power-velocity relationships under isokinetic loading. Med Sci Sports, 1978, 10(3): 159-166

[41]

Pitcher CA, Elliott CM, Williams SA, et al.. Childhood muscle morphology and strength: alterations over six months of growth. Muscle Nerve, 2012, 46(3): 360-366

[42]

Preacher K. Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients. 2002. http://quantpsy.org/corrtest/corrtest.htm. Accessed 2 Nov 2022.

[43]

Seger JY, Thorstensson A. Muscle strength and myoelectric activity in prepubertal and adult males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol, 1994, 69(1): 81-87

[44]

Seger JY, Thorstensson A. Muscle strength and electromyogram in boys and girls followed through puberty. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2000, 81(1–2): 54-61

[45]

Suchomel TJ, Sands WA, McNeal JR. Comparison of static, countermovement, and drop jumps of the upper and lower extremities in U.S. Junior National Team Male Gymnasts. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2016, 8(1): 15-30

[46]

Vincent WJ, Weir JP. Statistics in Kinesiology, 2020 5 Champaign, IL Human Kinetics

[47]

Warburton DER, Jamnik VK, Bredin SSD, Gledhill N. The physical activity readiness questionnaire for everyone (PAR-Q+) and electronic physical activity readiness medical examination (ePARmed-X+). Health Fitness J Canada, 2011, 4: 3-23

[48]

Waugh CM, Korff T, Fath F, Blazevich AJ. Rapid force production in children and adults: mechanical and neural contributions. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2013, 45(4): 762-771

[49]

Wood LE, Dixon S, Grant C, Armstrong N. Elbow flexion and extension strength relative to body or muscle size in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2004, 36(11): 1977-1984

Funding

National Strength and Conditioning Association

National Institute of Food and Agriculture(1000080)

Abbott Nutrition

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Beijing Sport University

PDF

209

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/