Comparision of Game Data Between Halves and Quarters in Division I Women’s Lacrosse

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare in-game external load demands from the previous game format (two, 30-min halves) to the new format (four, 15-min quarters) in collegiate women’s lacrosse.

Methods

External workload variables (total distance, high-intensity distance [HID], sprints, sprint distance, accelerations, and decelerations) were collected via microtechnology per minute of athlete (n = 13) playing time by half (H) for year one (Y1) and by quarter (Q) for year 2 (Y2).

Results

In H1, Y2 registered more distance (Y2: 179 ± 37 m/min, Y1: 69 ± 45 m/min), HID (Y2: 26.4 ± 9.8 m/min, Y1: 6.5 ± 5.0 m/min), accelerations (Y2: 3.2 ± 0.8 reps/min, Y1: 1.4 ± 0.9 reps/min), decelerations (Y2: 1.0 ± 0.3 reps/min, Y2: 0.4 ± 0.3 reps/min, all P < 0.001), sprints (Y2: 0.36 ± 0.25 reps/min, Y1: 0.07 ± 0.06 reps/min, P = 0.006) and sprint distance (Y2: 13.2 ± 8.7 m/min, Y1: 2.3 ± 2.0 m/min, P = 0.004). Y2 was greater in H2 for distance (Y2: 175 ± 24 m/min, Y1: 109 ± 28 m/min, P < 0.001), HID (Y2: 21.1 ± 0.6 m/min, Y1: 9.9 ± 3.3 m/min, P < 0.001), sprints (Y2: 0.29 ± 0.19 reps/min, Y1: 0.11 ± 0.04 reps/min, P = 0.003), accelerations (Y2: 2.8 ± 0.6 reps/min, Y1: 2.1 ± 0.5 reps/min, P = 0.003), decelerations (Y2: 0.9 ± 0.2 reps/min, Y1: 0.5 ± 0.1 reps/min, P = 0.001) and sprint distance (Y2: 10.6 ± 6.4 m/min, Y1: 3.7 ± 1.4 m/min, P = 0.002). Differences in whole game was found for sprints (Y2: 0.24 ± 0.3 reps/min, Y1: 0.11 ± 0.05 reps/min, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

The new competitive format presented a greater demand for players, with more high-intensity efforts and greater anaerobic demand. Coaches can use this information as key performance indicators to develop and alter training to focus on meeting higher-intensity game demands.

Keywords

Athlete monitoring / Female athlete / Global positioning system / VX sport / External load

References

[1] AkiyamaK, SasakiT, MashikoM. Male lacrosse players’ match activity profile. J Sports Sci Med, 2019, 18(2): 290-294

[2] BunnJA, MyersBJ, ReagorMK. An evaluation of training load measures for drills in women’s collegiate lacrosse. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2021, 16(6): 841-848.

[3] BynumL, SnarrRL, MyersBJ, BunnJA. Assessment of relationships between external load metrics and game performance in women’s lacrosse. Int J Exerc Sci, 2022, 15(6): 488-497

[4] CalderAR, DuthieGM, JohnstonRD, EngelHD. Physical demands of female collegiate lacrosse competition: whole-match and peak periods analysis. Sport Sci Health, 2021, 17(1): 103-109.

[5] CohenJStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 19882Mahwah. Erlabum.

[6] DevineNF, HegedusEJ, NguyenA-D, FordKR, TaylorJB. External match load in women’s collegiate lacrosse. J Strength Cond Res, 2020, 36(2): 503-507.

[7] HamletMD, FrickMD, BunnJA. High-speed running density in collegiate women’s lacrosse. Res Sports Med, 2021, 29(4): 386-394.

[8] HauerR, TessitoreA, HauerK, TschanH. Activity profile of international female lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res, 2019, 35(11): 3207-3212.

[9] KilianJ, SnymanK, MiyashitaT. Comparison of in-game external load metrics among positions and between halves for division I collegiate women’s lacrosse athletes. Int J Strength Cond, 2022.

[10] Malone S, Doran D, Collins K, Morotn J, McRobert A. Accuracy and reliability of VXsport global positioning system in intermittent activity. Presented at ECS Congress. 2014;19:1-2

[11] NCAA. 2022 and 2023 women’s lacrosse rules changes. In: Amazon AWS. NCAA Women’s Lacrosse Rules Committee and Playing Rules Oversight Panel. 2021. https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/championships/sports/lacrosse/rules/women/2022-23PRWLA_RulesChanges.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2023.

[12] PolleyCS, CormackSJ, GabbettTJ, PolglazeT. Activity profile of high-level australian lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res, 2015, 29(1): 126-136.

[13] RosenbergRC, MyersBJ, BunnJA. Sprint and distance zone analysis by position in division I women’s lacrosse. J Sport Human Perform, 2021, 9(2): 51-57.

[14] ScottTJ, ThorntonHR, ScottMTU, DascombeBJ, DuthieGM. Differences between relative and absolute speed and metabolic thresholds in rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2018, 13(3): 298-304. Epub 2018 Mar 1 PMID: 28657854

[15] ThorntonA, BradleyJM, JenniferAB. Comparison of in vs. out of conference game demands in collegiate division I women’s lacrosse. J Athl Enhanc, 2021, 10(5): 1-4

[16] Unknown. VX sport metric glossary. 2022. https://support.vxsport.com/hc/en-us/articles/115006458148-VX-Sport-Metric-Glossary. Accessed 14 Dec 2022.

[17] WeldonA, OwenAL, LoturcoI, KyriacouY, WongW, MaloneS, SampaioJ, ScanlanAT. Match demands of male and female international lacrosse players competing under the world lacrosse sixes format. J Strength Cond Res, 2022, 37(2): 413-422

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Beijing Sport University