Comparison of Game Data Between Halves and Quarters in Division I Women’s Lacrosse

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare in-game external load demands from the previous game format (two, 30-min halves) to the new format (four, 15-min quarters) in collegiate women’s lacrosse.

Methods

External workload variables (total distance, high-intensity distance [HID], sprints, sprint distance, accelerations, and decelerations) were collected via microtechnology per minute of athlete (n = 13) playing time by half (H) for year one (Y1) and by quarter (Q) for year 2 (Y2).

Results

In H1, Y2 registered more distance (Y2: 179 ± 37 m/min, Y1: 69 ± 45 m/min), HID (Y2: 26.4 ± 9.8 m/min, Y1: 6.5 ± 5.0 m/min), accelerations (Y2: 3.2 ± 0.8 reps/min, Y1: 1.4 ± 0.9 reps/min), decelerations (Y2: 1.0 ± 0.3 reps/min, Y2: 0.4 ± 0.3 reps/min, all P < 0.001), sprints (Y2: 0.36 ± 0.25 reps/min, Y1: 0.07 ± 0.06 reps/min, P = 0.006) and sprint distance (Y2: 13.2 ± 8.7 m/min, Y1: 2.3 ± 2.0 m/min, P = 0.004). Y2 was greater in H2 for distance (Y2: 175 ± 24 m/min, Y1: 109 ± 28 m/min, P < 0.001), HID (Y2: 21.1 ± 0.6 m/min, Y1: 9.9 ± 3.3 m/min, P < 0.001), sprints (Y2: 0.29 ± 0.19 reps/min, Y1: 0.11 ± 0.04 reps/min, P = 0.003), accelerations (Y2: 2.8 ± 0.6 reps/min, Y1: 2.1 ± 0.5 reps/min, P = 0.003), decelerations (Y2: 0.9 ± 0.2 reps/min, Y1: 0.5 ± 0.1 reps/min, P = 0.001) and sprint distance (Y2: 10.6 ± 6.4 m/min, Y1: 3.7 ± 1.4 m/min, P = 0.002). Differences in whole game was found for sprints (Y2: 0.24 ± 0.3 reps/min, Y1: 0.11 ± 0.05 reps/min, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

The new competitive format presented a greater demand for players, with more high-intensity efforts and greater anaerobic demand. Coaches can use this information as key performance indicators to develop and alter training to focus on meeting higher-intensity game demands.

Keywords

Athlete monitoring / Female athlete / Global positioning system / VX sport / External load

References

[1] Akiyama K, Sasaki T, Mashiko M. Male lacrosse players’ match activity profile. J Sports Sci Med, 2019, 18(2): 290-294

[2] Bunn JA, Myers BJ, Reagor MK. An evaluation of training load measures for drills in women’s collegiate lacrosse. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2021, 16(6): 841-848

[3] Bynum L, Snarr RL, Myers BJ, Bunn JA. Assessment of relationships between external load metrics and game performance in women’s lacrosse. Int J Exerc Sci, 2022, 15(6): 488-497

[4] Calder AR, Duthie GM, Johnston RD, Engel HD. Physical demands of female collegiate lacrosse competition: whole-match and peak periods analysis. Sport Sci Health, 2021, 17(1): 103-109

[5] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 19882Mahwah, Erlabum

[6] Devine NF, Hegedus EJ, Nguyen A-D, Ford KR, Taylor JB. External match load in women’s collegiate lacrosse. J Strength Cond Res, 2020, 36(2): 503-507

[7] Hamlet MD, Frick MD, Bunn JA. High-speed running density in collegiate women’s lacrosse. Res Sports Med, 2021, 29(4): 386-394

[8] Hauer R, Tessitore A, Hauer K, Tschan H. Activity profile of international female lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res, 2019, 35(11): 3207-3212

[9] Kilian J, Snyman K, Miyashita T. Comparison of in-game external load metrics among positions and between halves for division I collegiate women’s lacrosse athletes. Int J Strength Cond, 2022

[10] Malone S, Doran D, Collins K, Morotn J, McRobert A. Accuracy and reliability of VXsport global positioning system in intermittent activity. Presented at ECS Congress. 2014;19:1-2

[11] NCAA. 2022 and 2023 women’s lacrosse rules changes. In: Amazon AWS. NCAA Women’s Lacrosse Rules Committee and Playing Rules Oversight Panel. 2021. https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/championships/sports/lacrosse/rules/women/2022-23PRWLA_RulesChanges.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2023.

[12] Polley CS, Cormack SJ, Gabbett TJ, Polglaze T. Activity profile of high-level australian lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res, 2015, 29(1): 126-136

[13] Rosenberg RC, Myers BJ, Bunn JA. Sprint and distance zone analysis by position in division I women’s lacrosse. J Sport Human Perform, 2021, 9(2): 51-57

[14] Scott TJ, Thornton HR, Scott MTU, Dascombe BJ, Duthie GM. Differences between relative and absolute speed and metabolic thresholds in rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2018, 13(3): 298-304 Epub 2018 Mar 1 PMID: 28657854

[15] Thornton A, Bradley JM, Jennifer AB. Comparison of in vs. out of conference game demands in collegiate division I women’s lacrosse. J Athl Enhanc, 2021, 10(5): 1-4

[16] Unknown. VX sport metric glossary. 2022. https://support.vxsport.com/hc/en-us/articles/115006458148-VX-Sport-Metric-Glossary. Accessed 14 Dec 2022.

[17] Weldon A, Owen AL, Loturco I, Kyriacou Y, Wong W, Malone S, Sampaio J, Scanlan AT. Match demands of male and female international lacrosse players competing under the world lacrosse sixes format. J Strength Cond Res, 2022, 37(2): 413-422

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Beijing Sport University