Reliability and Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometer and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer for Testing Shoulder Isometric External and Internal Rotator Muscles Strength
Francesco Bettariga , Nicola Francesco Lopomo , Fabio Civera , Stefano Giuseppe Lazzarini , Lisa Mantovani , Luca Maestroni
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) : 386 -393.
Shoulder strength evaluation is a recommended procedure in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
To examine hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) and hand-held dynamometer (HHD) intra- and inter-rater reliability during isometric shoulder external and internal rotation strength testing in prone rotation position in asymptomatic participants, and to compare these two testing modalities.
Reliability study.
A total of 20 asymptomatic participants (27.7±7.4 years; 77.1±10.1 kg) attended a strength assessment consisting of HHS and HHD tests. Reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), coefficient of variation (CV) with 95%CI, and standard error of measurement (SEM). Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were used to compare HHS and HHD testing modalities.
“Good” to “excellent” intra (ICC range=0.896 to 0.979) and inter-rater reliability scores (ICC range=0.850 to 0.978) were displayed during both HHS and HHD tests during internal and external rotation strength assessments. Linear relationships between HHS and HHD measures were found, with coefficients of determination (R2) ranging between 0.60 and 0.79.
HHS and HHD resulted to be reliable strength assessment modalities for clinical practice. These assessment modes can be equally valid in assessing intra and inter-limb asymmetries in isometric shoulder rotation strength. The affordability and availability of HHS in ordinary clinical settings can facilitate its implementation in musculoskeletal practice.
Sphygmomanometer / Hand-held dynamometer / Reliability / Shoulder
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Bettariga F, Turner A, Maloney S, Maestroni L, Jarvis P, Bishop C. The effects of training interventions on interlimb asymmetries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Strength Cond J. 2022;44(5):69–86. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Hopman K, Krahe L, Lukersmith S, McColl AR, Vine K. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of rotator cuff syndrome in the workplce. The University of New South Wales. 2013. http://rcs.med.unsw.edu.au/rotatorcuffsyndromeguidelines. |
| [15] |
Cools AM, Vanderstukken F, Vereecken F, Duprez M, Heyman K, Goethals N, Johansson F. Eccentric and isometric shoulder rotator cuff strength testing using a hand-held dynamometer: reference values for overhead athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(12):3838–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3755-9. |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Ashworth B, Hogben P, Singh N, Tulloch L, Cohen DD. The Athletic Shoulder (ASH) test: reliability of a novel upper body isometric strength test in elite rugby players. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4(1): e000365. https://doi/org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000365. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Dollings H, Sandford F, O’ Conaire E, Lewis JS. Shoulder strength testing: the intra- and inter-tester reliability of routine clinical tests, using the PowerTrack™ II Commander. Shoulder Elbow. 2017;4(2):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5740.2011.00162.x. |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Barbosa A, Intelangelo L, Bordachar D, Fernandes I, Cardoso D, Fernandes I, Porfirio W, Felicio D. Validity and reliability of shoulder strength assessment during scaption, internal rotation and external rotation using an anchored, non-modified sphygmomanometer. Human Movement. 2018;19(2):90–8. https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2018.74064. |
| [26] |
McLaine SJ, Ginn KA, Kitic CM, Fell JW, Bird M-L. The reliability of strength tests performed in elevated shoulder positions using a Handheld Dynamometer. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(2):2015-0034. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2015-0034. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Turner A, Brazier J, Bishop C, Chavda S, Cree J, Read P. Data analysis for strength and conditioning coaches: using excel to analyze reliability, differences, and relationships. Strength Cond J. 2015; 37(1):76–83. |
| [32] |
Borg DN, Bach AJ, O’Brien JL, Sainani KL. Calculating sample size for reliability studies. PM R. 2022;14(8):1018–25. |
| [33] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |