Dynamic Response of Triceratops with Elliptical Legs under Oblique Space Launches

Srinivasan Chandrasekaran , Puliparambil Unnikrishnan Ashish

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2) : 491 -507.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2) :491 -507. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-025-00702-8
Research Article
research-article
Dynamic Response of Triceratops with Elliptical Legs under Oblique Space Launches
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The offshore triceratops platform has emerged as a promising candidate for maritime launches due to its innovative and unique responsive characteristics. Their form-dominant design facilitates dynamic equilibrium and effectively controls the impact of the deck’s rotational motion during sea-borne launch. A parametric study examines how the shape of buoyant legs influences the dynamic response during rocket launches, utilizing ANSYS AQWA for analysis. The study finds that elliptical legs with an eccentricity of 2 reduce deck responses. While the deck rotation is driven by the quasi-static rocket thrust and the differential heave of the legs, the pitch response arises from the waves and is reduced by using elliptical legs. Numerical studies conducted during rocket launches show an amplified deck response. The vertical force on the deck is maximized during vertical launches and minimized during 30° launches. The pitch moment on the deck increases with launch eccentricity, which is attributed to the cantilever effect of the launch platform.

Keywords

Triceratops / Marine space launch / Elliptical legs / Oblique rocket launch / Dynamic analysis / Form dominant response control / Compliant platform

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Srinivasan Chandrasekaran, Puliparambil Unnikrishnan Ashish. Dynamic Response of Triceratops with Elliptical Legs under Oblique Space Launches. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2026, 25(2): 491-507 DOI:10.1007/s11804-025-00702-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmad FDesign of floating offshore platform, 2021Gazipur, BangladeshIslamic University of TechnologyReport-01

[2]

Ahmad O. An overview of design, construction, and installation of gravity offshore platforms. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Sciences and Applications, 2021, 3(1): 27-32

[3]

Amiri N, Shaterabadi M, Kashyzadeh R, Chizari M. A comprehensive review of design, monitoring, and failure in fixed offshore platforms. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(12): 1349

[4]

Ashish PU, Chandrasekaran S, Giorgio S. Parametric study on the deep ocean space-rocket launching Triceratops. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 295: 116946

[5]

Buhrig AL, Cox SM, Alexander TM, Krenitsky DM, Huebner CCSea launch program overview, 1996Reston, United StatesAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAIAA-96-1186-CP

[6]

Caporale AJHistory of San Marco, 1968WashingtonNASAX-724-70-19NASA-TM-X-70523

[7]

Cashin LMLessons from sea launch, 2001Alabama, USAMaxwell AFB: Air University AU/ACSC/039/2001-04

[8]

Chandrasekaran S, Madhuri S, Jain AK. Aerodynamic response of offshore Triceratops. Ship and Offshore Structures, 2013, 8(2): 123-140

[9]

Chandrasekaran SDynamic analysis and design of ocean structures, 20172SingaporeSpringer

[10]

Chandrasekaran S, Jain AK, Shafiq N, Wahab MMADesign aids for offshore platforms under special loads, 2021FloridaCRC Press280

[11]

Chandrasekaran S, Madhuri S. Dynamic response of offshore Triceratops: Numerical and experimental investigations. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 109: 401-409

[12]

Chandrasekaran S, Mayank S. Dynamic analyses of stiffened Triceratops under regular waves: Experimental investigations. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2017, 12(5): 697-705

[13]

Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R. Parametric studies on the impact response of offshore Triceratops in ultra-deep waters. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 16(7): 1002-1018

[14]

Chandrasekaran S, Rao M. Numerical analysis on Triceratops restraining system: failure conditions of tethers. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 2019, 13(9): 588-592

[15]

Chandrasekaran S, Shah B, Chauhan YJ. Tether response of offshore Triceratops under hurricane conditions. Structures, 2023, 51: 513-527

[16]

Chauhan Y, Chandrasekaran S, Serino G, Sanghvi C, Gohil A. Feasibility study of offshore triceratops-supported floating offshore wind turbine. J. Inst. of Engineers (India) Series A, 2024, 105: 295-305

[17]

Chen Y, Zhang D. Response-based analysis for Tension Leg Platform. J. Marine Sc. and App., 2017, 16(1): 87-92

[18]

Drain J. Sea-launch for small satellites: an American/Russian joint venture. Proceedings of the 7th Annual. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 1993

[19]

Frieze PA, Morandi AC, Birkinshaw M, Smith D, Dixon AT. Fixed and jack-up platforms: Basis for reliability assessment. Marine Structures, 1997, 10(2–4): 263-284

[20]

Fu JY, Peng DJ, Xiong XD, Jia H. Hydrodynamic performance of semi-submersible sea-launching platform. Ship Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 73-76(in Chinese)

[21]

Jain AK. Nonlinear coupled response of offshore tension leg platforms to regular wave forces. Ocean Engineering, 1997, 24(7): 577-592

[22]

Johnson CP, Mekba BB, Roesset JM. Simplified modeling for the nonlinear response of tension leg platforms in deep water. Proceedings of the Third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1993326-333

[23]

Li R, Ge H, Shu G. Parametric study on seismic control design of a new type of SMA damper installed in a frame-type bridge pier. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 31(2): 04017100

[24]

Li Y, Hu Z. A review of multi-attributes decision-making models for offshore oil and gas facilities decommissioning. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2022, 7(1): 58-74

[25]

Li Y, Kareem A. Response of tension leg platform to wave drift forces. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, 1992OTC-6885-MS

[26]

Lin BC, Tadjbakhsh IG, Papageorgiou AS, Ahmadi G. Performance of earthquake isolation systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 116(2): 24383

[27]

Mazzaretto OM, Menéndez M, Lobeto H. A global evaluation of the JONSWAP spectra suitability on coastal areas. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112756

[28]

Nagavinothini R, Chandrasekaran S. Dynamic response of offshore Triceratops with elliptical buoyant legs. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2020, 5(2): 697-705

[29]

Newmark NM. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 1959, 85(3): 67-94

[30]

Pang F, Qin Y, Tang Y, Gao C, Li H. Experimental study on impact response of sea-borne rocket launch platform. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 280: 114623

[31]

Seumahu ESHaskell G, Rycroft M. Exploration of the equatorial LEO orbit for communication and other applications. Space of service to humanity, 1997DordrechtSpringer

[32]

Shabanlou M, Moghaddam H, Saedi Daryan A. The effect of geometry on structural behavior of buildings with steel plate shear wall system subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021, 21: 650-665

[33]

Song Z, Xie Z, Qiu L, Xiang D, Li J. Prospects of sea launches for Chinese cryogenic liquid-fueled medium-lift launch vehicles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(1): 424-437

[34]

White CN, Copple RW, Capanoglu C. Triceratops: An effective platform for developing oil and gas fields in deep and ultra-deep water. Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2005133-139

[35]

Zhang T, Li L. Analytical analysis for optimizing mass ratio of nonlinear tuned mass dampers. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 106: 1955-1974

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

PDF

259

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/