Dynamic Response of Triceratops with Elliptical Legs under Oblique Space Launches

Abstract

The offshore triceratops platform has emerged as a promising candidate for maritime launches due to its innovative and unique responsive characteristics. Their form-dominant design facilitates dynamic equilibrium and effectively controls the impact of the deck’s rotational motion during sea-borne launch. A parametric study examines how the shape of buoyant legs influences the dynamic response during rocket launches, utilizing ANSYS AQWA for analysis. The study finds that elliptical legs with an eccentricity of 2 reduce deck responses. While the deck rotation is driven by the quasi-static rocket thrust and the differential heave of the legs, the pitch response arises from the waves and is reduced by using elliptical legs. Numerical studies conducted during rocket launches show an amplified deck response. The vertical force on the deck is maximized during vertical launches and minimized during 30° launches. The pitch moment on the deck increases with launch eccentricity, which is attributed to the cantilever effect of the launch platform.

Keywords

Triceratops / Marine space launch / Elliptical legs / Oblique rocket launch / Dynamic analysis / Form dominant response control / Compliant platform

References

[1] AhmadFDesign of floating offshore platform, 2021, Gazipur, Bangladesh, Islamic University of TechnologyReport-01

[2] AhmadO. An overview of design, construction, and installation of gravity offshore platforms. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Sciences and Applications, 2021, 3(1): 27-32

[3] AmiriN, ShaterabadiM, KashyzadehR, ChizariM. A comprehensive review of design, monitoring, and failure in fixed offshore platforms. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(12): 1349

[4] AshishPU, ChandrasekaranS, GiorgioS. Parametric study on the deep ocean space-rocket launching Triceratops. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 295: 116946

[5] BuhrigAL, CoxSM, AlexanderTM, KrenitskyDM, HuebnerCCSea launch program overview, 1996, Reston, United States, American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAIAA-96-1186-CP

[6] CaporaleAJHistory of San Marco, 1968, Washington, NASAX-724-70-19NASA-TM-X-70523

[7] CashinLMLessons from sea launch, 2001, Alabama, USA, Maxwell AFB: Air University AU/ACSC/039/2001-04

[8] ChandrasekaranS, MadhuriS, JainAK. Aerodynamic response of offshore Triceratops. Ship and Offshore Structures, 2013, 8(2): 123-140

[9] ChandrasekaranSDynamic analysis and design of ocean structures, 20172Singapore, Springer

[10] ChandrasekaranS, JainAK, ShafiqN, WahabMMADesign aids for offshore platforms under special loads, 2021, Florida, CRC Press: 280

[11] ChandrasekaranS, MadhuriS. Dynamic response of offshore Triceratops: Numerical and experimental investigations. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 109: 401-409

[12] ChandrasekaranS, MayankS. Dynamic analyses of stiffened Triceratops under regular waves: Experimental investigations. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2017, 12(5): 697-705

[13] ChandrasekaranS, NagavinothiniR. Parametric studies on the impact response of offshore Triceratops in ultra-deep waters. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 16(7): 1002-1018

[14] ChandrasekaranS, RaoM. Numerical analysis on Triceratops restraining system: failure conditions of tethers. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 2019, 13(9): 588-592

[15] ChandrasekaranS, ShahB, ChauhanYJ. Tether response of offshore Triceratops under hurricane conditions. Structures, 2023, 51: 513-527

[16] ChauhanY, ChandrasekaranS, SerinoG, SanghviC, GohilA. Feasibility study of offshore triceratops-supported floating offshore wind turbine. J. Inst. of Engineers (India) Series A, 2024, 105: 295-305

[17] ChenY, ZhangD. Response-based analysis for Tension Leg Platform. J. Marine Sc. and App., 2017, 16(1): 87-92

[18] DrainJ. Sea-launch for small satellites: an American/Russian joint venture. Proceedings of the 7th Annual. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 1993

[19] FriezePA, MorandiAC, BirkinshawM, SmithD, DixonAT. Fixed and jack-up platforms: Basis for reliability assessment. Marine Structures, 1997, 10(2–4): 263-284

[20] FuJY, PengDJ, XiongXD, JiaH. Hydrodynamic performance of semi-submersible sea-launching platform. Ship Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 73-76(in Chinese)

[21] JainAK. Nonlinear coupled response of offshore tension leg platforms to regular wave forces. Ocean Engineering, 1997, 24(7): 577-592

[22] JohnsonCP, MekbaBB, RoessetJM. Simplified modeling for the nonlinear response of tension leg platforms in deep water. Proceedings of the Third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1993326-333

[23] LiR, GeH, ShuG. Parametric study on seismic control design of a new type of SMA damper installed in a frame-type bridge pier. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 31(2): 04017100

[24] LiY, HuZ. A review of multi-attributes decision-making models for offshore oil and gas facilities decommissioning. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2022, 7(1): 58-74

[25] LiY, KareemA. Response of tension leg platform to wave drift forces. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, 1992OTC-6885-MS

[26] LinBC, TadjbakhshIG, PapageorgiouAS, AhmadiG. Performance of earthquake isolation systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 116(2): 24383

[27] MazzarettoOM, MenéndezM, LobetoH. A global evaluation of the JONSWAP spectra suitability on coastal areas. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112756

[28] NagavinothiniR, ChandrasekaranS. Dynamic response of offshore Triceratops with elliptical buoyant legs. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2020, 5(2): 697-705

[29] NewmarkNM. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE, 1959, 85(3): 67-94

[30] PangF, QinY, TangY, GaoC, LiH. Experimental study on impact response of sea-borne rocket launch platform. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 280: 114623

[31] SeumahuESHaskellG, RycroftM. Exploration of the equatorial LEO orbit for communication and other applications. Space of service to humanity, 1997, Dordrecht, Springer

[32] ShabanlouM, MoghaddamH, Saedi DaryanA. The effect of geometry on structural behavior of buildings with steel plate shear wall system subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021, 21: 650-665

[33] SongZ, XieZ, QiuL, XiangD, LiJ. Prospects of sea launches for Chinese cryogenic liquid-fueled medium-lift launch vehicles. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(1): 424-437

[34] WhiteCN, CoppleRW, CapanogluC. Triceratops: An effective platform for developing oil and gas fields in deep and ultra-deep water. Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2005133-139

[35] ZhangT, LiL. Analytical analysis for optimizing mass ratio of nonlinear tuned mass dampers. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 106: 1955-1974

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature