Cavitation of Cycloidal Propulsors Through CFD Analyses

Abstract

Cycloidal propellers (CPs) are an unconventional propulsion system that combines high manoeuvrability with complex unsteady hydrodynamics, making them attractive for specialized marine applications such as dynamic positioning. Despite their potential, only limited experimental and numerical data exist, and almost no information is available on cavitation phenomena and their effect on performance, despite the large angles of attack typically experienced by CP blades. To address this gap, the present study numerically investigates CP performance with emphasis on thrust generation, efficiency, and cavitation dynamics. A RANS-based CFD approach coupled with a simplified cavity model is used to capture the unsteady flow structures and vapor cavity evolution around the rotating blades. Results highlight the role of eccentricity, of the pivot point location as well as of the number of blades on non-cavitating and cavitating performances, investigated at several advance coefficients and cavitation indexes. Comparisons between three- and six-blade configurations further reveal how blade count and cascade effects modulate force peaks and bubble transitions. The findings contribute to understanding the behaviour of CP under realistic operating conditions, offering guidance for future developments in this type of high-performance propulsion system.

Keywords

Cycloidal propulsors / Cavitation / Unsteady RANSE / Blade kinematics / Unsteady blade loading / Eccentricity effects

References

[1] Altosole M, Donnarumma S, Spagnolo V, Vignolo S. Performance simulation of marine cycloidal propellers: a both theoretical and heuristic approach. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(4): 505

[2] Bakhtiari M, Ghassemi H. CFD data based neural network functions for predicting hydrodynamic performance of a low-pitch marine cycloidal propeller. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 94: 101981

[3] Eça L, Hoekstra M. A procedure for the estimation of the numerical uncertainty of CFD calculations based on grid refinement studies. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 262: 104-130

[4] Esmailian E, Ghassemi H, Heidari SA. Numerical investigation of the performance of Voith-Schneider propulsion. American Journal of Marine Science, 2014, 2(3): 58-62

[5] Ficken NL, Dickerson MC. Experimental performance and steering characteristics of cycloidal propellers, 1969 2983

[6] Gaggero S. Influence of laminar-to-Turbulent transition on model scale propeller performances. Part II: cavitating conditions. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(4): 772-791

[7] Gaggero S, Villa D. Steady cavitating propeller performance by using OpenFOAM, StarCCM+ and a boundary element method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2017, 231(2): 411-440

[8] Gaggero S, Villa D. Cavitating propeller performance in inclined shaft conditions with OpenFOAM: PPTC 2015 test case. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2018, 17(1): 1-20

[9] Guano N, Donnarumma S, Gaggero S (2025) A numerical overview of the Influence of cavitation on cycloidal propeller performances. Progress in Marine Science and Technology (10): 312–322. https://doi.org/10.3233/PMST250039

[10] Haberman WL, Harley EE. Performance of vertical axis (cycloidal) propellers calculated by Taniguchi’s method, 1961 SR00901011564

[11] Hu J, Li T, Guo C. Two-dimensional simulation of the hydrodynamic performance of a cycloidal propeller. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217: 107819

[12] Hu J, Wan Q, Yan Q, Li X, Ning X, Sun S. Numerical study on effects of geometric parameters influence on two-dimensional cycloidal propellers. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 309: 118289

[13] Jürgens B, Fork W. The fascination of the Voith-Schneider propeller: history and engineering, 2002

[14] Jürgens D, Heinke HJ. Voith Schneider Propeller (VSP) - Investigations of the cavitation behaviour. 1st International Symposium on Marine Propulsion, 2009

[15] Jürgens D, Palm M, Singer S, Urban K. Numerical optimization of the Voith - Schneider® propeller. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2007, 87(10): 698-710

[16] Li T, Hu J, Wang Y, Zhang W, Mao Y, Guo C. Hydrodynamic analysis of cycloidal propellers. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(9): 2116-2129

[17] Liu Z, Xue W, Liu W, Chen Q. Unsteady hydrodynamic calculation and characteristic analysis of Voith-Schneider propeller with high eccentricity. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(8): 1407

[18] Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 4(1): 625-632

[19] Nakonechny BV. Experimental performance of a six-bladed vertical axis propeller, 19611446

[20] Palm M, Jürgens D, Bendl D. Numerical and experimental study on ventilation for azimuth thrusters and cycloidal propellers. 2nd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, 2011

[21] Prabhu J, Nagarajan V, Sha OP. Unsteady flow analysis of marine cycloidal propeller. Coastal & Inland Shipping Conference, 2015

[22] Prabhu J, Nagarajan V, Sunny MR, Sha OP. On the fluid-structure interaction of a marine cycloidal propeller. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 64: 105-127

[23] Prabhu J, Dash AK, Nagarajan V, Sha OP. On the hydrodynamic loading of marine cycloidal propeller during maneuvering. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 86: 87-110

[24] Sauer J, Schnerr GH. Unsteady cavitating flow-a new cavitation model based on a modified front capturing method and bubble dynamics. Proceedings of 2000 ASME Fluid Engineering Summer Conference, 2000, 251: 1073-1079

[25] Shi L, Bayeul-Lainé AC, Coutier-Delgosha O. Analysis of flow-induced performance change of cycloidal rotors: Influence of pitching kinematic and chord-to-radius ratio. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 263: 112382

[26] Shi L, Zhang D, Bayeul-Laine AC, Coutier-Delgosha O. Analysis of performance and flow structures of cycloidal rotors under different pitch-pivot-point and blade camber conditions. Energy, 2023, 282: 128997

[27] Siegel S, Seidel J, Cohen K, McLaughlin T. A cycloidal propeller using dynamic lift. 37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2007: 1-14

[28] Siemens Digital Industries Software. STAR-CCM+, version 18.06.007, 2023

[29] Sparenberg JA, De Graaf R. On the optimum one-bladed cycloidal ship propeller. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 1969, 3(1): 1-20

[30] Taniguchi K. Sea trial analysis of the vertical axis propellers. 4th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics: Propulsion Hydroelasticity, 1962, Washington, DC, Office of Naval Research and Web Institute of Naval Architecture: 27-31

[31] Van Manen JD. Results of systematic tests with vertical axis propellers. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1966, 13(148): 382-398

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.