PDF
Abstract
Floating offshore wind substructures operate predominantly under turbine production conditions, where system dynamics are strongly coupled. Accurate structural stress prediction therefore demands time-domain integrated load analysis (ILA). Fatigue governs the design of key components and must be addressed early through a fast, robust workflow from ILA to local stress evaluation. This paper presents a response-based methodology that ensures consistency between environmental loading and structural modeling, rigorously accounting for wind, wave, current, inertia, mooring, and Morison forces. When geometric and dynamic properties are aligned, the resultant boundary forces theoretically converge to zero, validating the integrated approach. This paper presents a validation for load recovery and its influence on the structural response in the time domain. As an application, structural analysis of a conventional semisubmersible FOW (floating offshore wind) platform supporting a 15 MW turbine is performed using both open-source (OpenFAST) and commercial (OrcaFlex) software for integrated load analyses. Recovered wind, wave, and current loads, as well as other resultant forces, are thoroughly analyzed to ensure load balance and verify whether they have been accurately considered in the structural analysis. The present study shows the importance of load balance to ensure the reliability of response-based time-domain structural analysis. This reliability then feeds into the ability to reach substructure design convergence and optimization in an acceptable time, decreasing risk and improving the chances of project success. As part of increasing chances for success, structural fatigue calculations and design can contribute to the fabrication, assembly duration, and costs, especially when considering serial production.
Keywords
Load balance
/
Floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT)
/
Response-based time-domain structural analysis
/
Local structural stresses
/
Load amplitudes
/
Load pattern
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Youjin Yim, Hyungtae Lee, Johyun Kyoung, Jang Kim, Laurent Mutricy, Raffaello Antonutti, Alexis Martin.
Consistency Assurance between Integrated Load Analysis and a Structural Model in Time-domain Analysis for a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine.
Journal of Marine Science and Application 1-20 DOI:10.1007/s11804-026-00845-2
| [1] |
American Bureau of Shipping. ABS guide for the fatigue assessment of offshore structures, 2020, Houston, ABS
|
| [2] |
ASTM E1049-85. Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis, 2017, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTMASTM International
|
| [3] |
Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures, 1996Pearson Education, Inc
|
| [4] |
Bureau Veritas. BV NR 572 Classification and certification of floating offshore wind turbines, 2024, Paris, Bureau Veritas
|
| [5] |
DNV. DNV-ST-0119 Floating wind turbine structures, 2021, Oslo, DNV
|
| [6] |
DNV. DNV-SE-0422 Certification of floating wind turbines, 2024, Oslo, DNV
|
| [7] |
Gao Z, Merino D, Han KJ, Li H, Fiskvik S. Time-domain floater stress analysis for a floating wind turbine. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, 2023, 8(4): 435-445
|
| [8] |
International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61400-3-2 Wind energy generation systems – Part 3-2: Design requirements for floating offshore wind turbines, 2019, Geneva, IEC
|
| [9] |
Korean Register. KR Launches ‘SeaTRUST-FOWT’ solution, 2023
|
| [10] |
Kurnia R, Ducrozet G. NEMOH: Open-source boundary element solver for computation of first- and second-order hydrodynamic loads in the frequency domain. Computer Physics Communications, 2023, 292: 108885
|
| [11] |
Kyoung JH, Samaria S, Kim JW, Duffy B. Response based time-domain structural analysis on floating offshore platform. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2019, New York, ASME
|
| [12] |
Kyoung JH, Samaria S, Kim JW. Time-domain structural fatigue analysis of floating offshore platforms: A response based technique. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2020, New York, ASME OMAE2020-18314
|
| [13] |
Lee HT, Kim JG, Kim JO, Shen Z, Kyoung JH, Baquet A, Lee HJ, Kim JW. An efficient time-domain structural assessment of a floating wind turbine structure. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2023, New York, ASME OMAE2023-108155
|
| [14] |
Lee CH. WAMIT theory manual, 1995, Cambridge, MIT
|
| [15] |
Lim HJ, Samaria S, Choi SJ, Sablok A, Jang HK, Koo BJ. Time-domain structural analysis and digital twin application for floating offshore wind turbine. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2023, New York, ASME OMAE2023-105074
|
| [16] |
Newman JN. Marine Hydrodynamics, 1977, Cambridge, MIT Press
|
| [17] |
NREL/TP-5000-75698. Definition of the IEA wind 15-Megawatt offshore reference wind turbine technical report, 2020
|
| [18] |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. OpenFAST Documentation, 2025
|
| [19] |
Orcina. OrcaFlex manual, 2025, Ulverston, Orcina Ltd
|
| [20] |
Orcina. OrcaWave manual, 2025, Ulverston, Orcina Ltd
|
| [21] |
Pineau H, Antonutti R, Martin A, Guinot F. Hyperbox method: a design-oriented selection of fatigue load cases for offshore wind turbines. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2875: 012015
|
| [22] |
Reddy JN. Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 2018
|
| [23] |
Siemens Digital Industries Software. Nastran 2312 Siemens Simcenter Nastran Release Notes and User’s Guide, 2020
|
| [24] |
Siemens. Simcenter Nastran Quick Reference Guide 2020. 1 Series, 2020
|
| [25] |
Stanzione D, West J, Evans RT, Minyard T, Ghattas O, Panda DK. Frontera: The evolution of leadership computing at the national science foundation. PEARC’ 20: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2020: Catch the Wave Brella: PEARC, 2020106-111
|
| [26] |
Wehausen JV, Laitone EV, Flügge S, Truesdell C. Surface waves. Encyclopedia of Physics, 1960, 9: 446-778
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Just Accepted
This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.