Numerical Analysis for the Improvement of the Bulbous Bow Shape of a Ship Hull using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Sajib Das , Md. Mehrab Khan , Md. Mashud Karim

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› : 1 -13.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› :1 -13. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-026-00832-7
Research Article
research-article

Numerical Analysis for the Improvement of the Bulbous Bow Shape of a Ship Hull using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The employment of a bulbous bow has become a widespread practice in shipping industries long after its first creation. Among of all investigations on enhancing hull shape, the improved bow design received the most attention. This research evaluates the improvement of the bulbous bow shape of a ship hull by utilizing free form deformation (FFD) based on parametric study without employing any optimization algorithm. There have been numerous combinations of lengths, breadths, and angles each of those has individual influence on the total resistance of a ship. After parametric study, the best combination of these param is found which resulted in the generation of the most improved bulbous bow making the lowest resistance. The overall resistance coefficient is also significantly lower while comparing the parent hull with that having the improved bow. The improved bulbous bow shape of the hull also impacts the properties of hydrodynamics, involving wave heights and wall shear stress, which get reduced at various Froude Numbers. This will increase fuel efficiency and economic maintenance while reducing emissions and impact on the environment.

Keywords

RANS / Finite volume method / Free form deformation / JBC hull / Bulbous bow / Hull resistance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sajib Das, Md. Mehrab Khan, Md. Mashud Karim. Numerical Analysis for the Improvement of the Bulbous Bow Shape of a Ship Hull using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Journal of Marine Science and Application 1-13 DOI:10.1007/s11804-026-00832-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aksenov AA, Pechenyuk AV, Vučinić D. Ship hull form design and optimization based on CFD. CRC Press eBooks, 2015

[2]

Andersson J, Hyensjö M, Eslamdoost A, Bensow R. CFD simulations of the Japan bulk Carrier test case. 18th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium (NUTTS 2015), Marstrand, Sweden, 2015

[3]

Coppedé A, Vernengo G, Villa D. A combined approach based on subdivision surface and free form deformation for smart ship hull form design and variation. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2018, 13(7): 769-778

[4]

Date J, Turnock S. A study into the techniques needed to accurately predict skin friction using RANS solvers with validation against Froude’s historical flat plate experimental data, 1999114

[5]

Feng Y, Moctar OE, Schellin TE. Parametric hull form optimization of containerships for minimum resistance in calm water and in waves. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2021, 20(4): 670-693

[6]

Franck G, Mangini S, Prende H, Huespe J, Esquivel YP. Numerical simulation of large commercial ship navigation on Paraná river, Argentina. VII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, 201710281039

[7]

Hao H, Chen W, Li C. Hull form optimization to lower resistance in still water and added resistance in waves. 11th International Workshop on Ship and Marine Hydrodynamics (IWSH2019), Hamburg, Germany, 2019

[8]

Harries S. Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms, 1998ISBN393334624X, 9783933346247

[9]

Hino T, Stern F, Larsson L, Visonneau M, Hirata N, Kim J. Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics- An Assessment of the Tokyo 2015 Workshop, 2020

[10]

Huang Y, Zhang L, Wang S. Towards a full-scale CFD guideline for simulating a ship. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2023, 18(7): 652-664

[11]

ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines 7.5-03-02-03, 2011, 11. https://ittc.info/media/1357/75-03-02-03.pdf

[12]

ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines 7.5-02-02-02, 2002. https://ittc.info/media/1818/75-02-02-02.pdf

[13]

Jones W, Launder B. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972, 15(2): 301-314

[14]

Karihaloo BL, Milne I, Ritchie R. Comprehensive structural integrity, 2003, 10: 410volume set

[15]

Kim H, Yang C. Design optimization of bulbous bow and stern end bulb for reduced drag. The Twenty-third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2013

[16]

Launder B, Sharma B. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1974, 1(2): 131-137

[17]

Li C, Wang Y, Chen J. Study on the shape param of bulbous bow of tuna longline fishing vessel. International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection (ICEEP 2016), 2016

[18]

Liu X, Zhao W, Wan D. Hull form optimization based on calm-water wave drag with or without generating bulbous bow. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 116: 102861

[19]

Liu X, Zhao W, Wan D. Multi-fidelity Co-Kriging surrogate model for ship hull form optimization. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 243: 110239

[20]

Liu Z, Zhao W, Wan D. Resistance and wake distortion optimization of JBC considering ship-propeller interaction. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 244: 110376

[21]

Menzel S, Olhofer M, Sendhoff B. Application of free form deformation techniques in evolutionary design optimisation, 2005

[22]

Menzel S, Olhofer M, Sendhoff B. Direct manipulation of free form deformation in evolutionary design optimisation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006352-361

[23]

Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. Automated CFD-based optimization of inverted bow shape of a trimaran ship: Proposing an applicable and efficient optimization platform. Scientia Iranica, 2020

[24]

Park J, Choi J, Chun H. Hull-form optimization of KSUEZMAX to enhance resistance performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2015, 7(1): 100-114

[25]

Patankar S, Spalding D. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972, 15(10): 1787-1806

[26]

Rahman MW, Hoque KN (2023) Numerical Analysis of supply vessel collision with tripod jacket structures. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4446349

[27]

Sahoo PK, Doctors LJ, Renilson MR. Theoretical and experimental investigation of resistance of high-speed round bilge hull forms. TU Delft Repository, 1999

[28]

Sederberg TW, Parry SR. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 1986, 20(4): 151-160

[29]

Serani A, Scholcz TP, Vanzi V. A scoping review on simulation-based design optimization in marine engineering: Trends, best practices, and gaps. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2024, 31: 4709-4737

[30]

Shen Y, Ye S, Zhang Y, Qi L, Jiang Q, Cai L, Jiang B. Application of machine learning for bulbous bow optimization design and ship resistance prediction. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(6): 2934

[31]

Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 20072nd ed75-76

[32]

Villa D, Furcas F, Pralits JO, Vernengo G, Gaggero S. An effective mesh deformation approach for hull shape design by optimization. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(10): 1107

[33]

Voxakis P. Ship hull resistance calculations using CFD methods, 2018

[34]

Wilson RV, Stern F, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations— Part 2: Application for RANS simulation of a cargo/container ship. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 1234803-810

[35]

Yin C, Wu J, Sun T, Wan D. A numerical study for self-propelled JBC with and without energy saving device. Proceedings of the Tokyo 2015 CFD Workshop, Tokyo, 2015

[36]

Zeneli M, Nikolopoulos A, Karellas S, Nikolopoulos N. Numerical methods for solid-liquid phase-change problems, 2020165199

[37]

Zhou J, Wu X, Jia H, Yu J. Adaptive free-form deformation parameterization based on spring analogy method for aerodynamic shape optimization. Fluids, 2024, 9(11): 256

[38]

Zou Y, Zhao X, Chen Q. Comparison of STAR-CCM+ and ANSYS Fluent for simulating indoor airflows. Building Simulation, 2017, 111165-174

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

PDF

4

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/