Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall

Yao Zhou , Jia Wang , Zhigao Wang , Tao Shi , Xuanlie Zhao , Jing Geng , C. Guedes Soares

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› : 1 -14.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› :1 -14. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-025-00790-6
Research Article
research-article

Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this paper, a numerical study is performed to investigate the hydrodynamic responses of a floating platform equipped with a heave plate adjacent to a partially reflective vertical wall. Based on the linear potential flow theory, a three-dimensional (3D) boundary element method (BEM) model, incorporating an image Green’s function, is developed to solve the wave radiation/diffraction problem in the presence of a partially reflective wall. The results confirm the efficacy of the heave plate, and the hydrodynamic response is governed by the reflection coefficient of the coast and the dimensionless distance between the coast and the platform (C/Wb, where C and Wb are the offshore distance and the width of the floating platform). Compared with open water conditions, the increasing of reflection coeffect suppresses surge motion but amplifies heave motion in the lower frequency region (ω < 0.5 rad/s). Moreover, the surge motion in the lower frequency range increases and the peak heave motion decreases as C/Wb increases within the range of 0.5–3 rad/s.

Keywords

Potential theory / Coastal reflection / Hydrodynamic performance / Boundary element method / Heave plate

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yao Zhou, Jia Wang, Zhigao Wang, Tao Shi, Xuanlie Zhao, Jing Geng, C. Guedes Soares. Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating Platform with a Heave Plate Adjacent to a Partially Reflective Vertical Wall. Journal of Marine Science and Application 1-14 DOI:10.1007/s11804-025-00790-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Amouzadrad P, Mohapatra SC, Guedes Soares C. Review of recent developments on the hydroelastic response and gap resonance of multi-body floating structures. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 313: 119398.

[2]

Anderson E, Bai Z, Bischof C, Blackford LS, Demmel J, Dongarra J, Du Croz J, Greenbaum A, Hammarling S, McKenney A, Sorensen D. LAPACK users’ guide, 19993rd edn.Philadelphia. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

[3]

Bagbanci H, Karmakar D, Guedes Soares CGuedes Soares C, Santos T. Review of offshore floating wind turbines concepts. Maritime Engineering and Technology. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Technology and Engineering (MARTECH 2011), 2012, London. Taylor & Francis Group553-562

[4]

Berkhoff JCW. Mathematical models for simple harmonic linear water waves: Wave diffraction and refraction, 1976, Delft. Technische Universiteit Delft

[5]

Bhattacharjee J, Guedes Soares C. Wave interaction with a floating rectangular box near a vertical wall with step type bottom topography. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B, 2010, 22: 91-96.

[6]

Bhattacharjee J, Guedes Soares C. Oblique wave interaction with a floating structure near a wall with stepped bottom. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38: 1528-1544.

[7]

Cong P, Chen L, Gou Y. Hydrodynamic interaction among multiple columns in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 197: 106877.

[8]

Duan W, Xu S, Xu Q, Ertekin RC, Ma S. Performance of an F-type floating breakwater: A numerical and experimental study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2017, 231: 583599.

[9]

Elchahal G, Younes R, Lafon P. The effects of reflection coefficient of the harbour sidewall on the performance of floating breakwaters. Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35: 1102-1112.

[10]

Gui J, Yuan A, Zhao X, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Guo Y. Numerical analysis of wave dissipation characteristics of bucket-type permeable breakwater, 20251-10

[11]

Haskind MD. The exciting forces and wetting of ships in waves. Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR Otdelenie Tekhnicheskikh Nauk, 1957, 7: 65-79

[12]

Ji X, Li Y, Tang Y, Tong B. Viscous damping effect and vortex shedding performance of the novel anti-motion structures on a cylindrical FPSO. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 190: 106430.

[13]

Kim GJ, Kim SH, Rim UR, Jon MH. Hydrodynamic interaction of a floating structure with free water surface wave near a vertical wall based on a Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) boundary condition. Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, 2025, 20: 18.

[14]

KMSB. Optimising marine logistics in the northwest, 2025[Accessed 1 May 2025]

[15]

Lavrov A, Guedes Soares C. Modelling the heave oscillations of vertical cylinders with damping plates. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2016, 158: A187-A197

[16]

Li D, Yi C, Fu S, Bai X, Gao W, Lyu B. Motion response characteristics and suppression methods of cylindrical FPSO. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2025, 37: 184-193

[17]

Lopez-Pavon C, Souto-Iglesias A. Hydrodynamic coefficients and pressure loads on heave plates for semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbines: A comparative analysis using large scale models. Renewable Energy, 2015, 81: 864-881.

[18]

Loukogeorgaki E, Chatjigeorgiou IK. Hydrodynamic performance of an array of truncated cylinders in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 189: 106407.

[19]

Micallef D, Rezaeiha A. Floating offshore wind turbine aerodynamics: Trends and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 152: 111696.

[20]

Newman JN. Algorithms for the free-surface Green function. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 1985, 19: 57-67.

[21]

Nguyen HP, Wang CM, Tay ZY, Luong VH. Wave energy converter and large floating platform integration: A review. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 213: 107768.

[22]

Ning D, Teng B, Song XQ. Analytical study on wave diffraction from a vertical circular cylinder in front of orthogonal vertical walls. Advances in Marine Science, 2005, 22(1): 29-35

[23]

Porter R, Evans DV. Estimation of wall effects on floating cylinders. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2011, 70: 191-204.

[24]

Sahoo H, Gayathri R, Khan MBM, Behera H. Hybrid boundary element and eigenfunction expansion method for wave trapping by a floating porous box near a rigid wall. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2023, 18: 1148-1158.

[25]

Srinivasan N, Chakrabarti S, Radha R. Response analysis of a truss-pontoon semisubmersible with heave-plates. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2006, 128: 100-107.

[26]

Sun L, Zong Z, Dong GHZhuang FG, Li JC. Action of ship waves on a vertical cylinder in front of a vertical wall. New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research, 2009, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer377

[27]

Tao L, Cai S. Heave motion suppression of a Spar with a heave plate. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31: 669-692.

[28]

Teng B, Li Z, Gou Y, Shi H, Li Y. A BEM model for diffraction and radiation problems of a body in front of a partial reflecting wall. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 324: 120697.

[29]

Teng B, Ning DZ, Zhang XT. Wave radiation by a uniform cylinder in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31: 201-224.

[30]

Wang C, Cui M, Cheng Z, Moan T. A review on design and analysis of floating bridges: Numerical simulations, model tests and field measurements. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 306: 118065.

[31]

Wang X, Gu X, Ding J, Wang Q, Cai Z, Cheng X, Guedes Soares C. Uncertainty analysis of wave loads for multi-connected domain large floating bodies near islands and reefs. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 335: 121676.

[32]

Wang ZG, Zhou Y, Zhao XL, Geng J, Guedes Soares CGuedes Soares C, Wang S. Hydrodynamic analysis of a power take-off damped floating breakwater in front of the coast. Innovations in Renewable Energies Offshore, 20251st ednLondon. CRC Press853-860

[33]

Watanabe E, Wang CM, Utsunomiya T, Moan T. Very large floating structures: applications, analysis and design, 2004, Singapore. Centre for Offshore Research and Engineering, National University of Singapore

[34]

Xin S. Numerical simulation of the motion response of moored ships in front of the wharf, 2005, Dalian. Dalian University of Technology

[35]

Yuan X, Liu J, Yan J, Guo A. Experimental study on the dynamic responses of a segmental submerged floating tunnel model under the coupled action of waves currents, and earthquakes. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 339: 122178.

[36]

Zhang X, Ma S, Duan W. A new L type floating breakwater derived from vortex dissipation simulation. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 164: 455-464.

[37]

Zhao X, Du X, Li M, Göteman M. Semi-analytical study on the hydrodynamic performance of an interconnected floating breakwater-WEC system in presence of the seawall. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 109: 102555.

[38]

Zhao X, Wang J, Geng J, Zhou S, Guedes Soares C. Hydrodynamic investigation of a multi-module floating platform with a wave energy device array. China Ocean Engineering, 2024, 38: 1034-1046.

[39]

Zhao X, Xue F, Chen L, Göteman M, Han D, Geng J, Sun S. Hydrodynamic analysis of a floating platform coupled with an array of oscillating bodies. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 287: 115439.

[40]

Zheng S, Zhang Y. Wave diffraction from a truncated cylinder in front of a vertical wall. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 104: 329-343.

[41]

Zhou Y, Zhao X, Geng J, Guedes Soares C. Wave diffraction and radiation from a floating platform with a moonpool array. ASME 2024 43rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2024), 2024V009T13A011

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

25

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/