Effects of Intervening Water Layers on the Penetration Performance of Underwater Shaped Charge Jets

Abstract

The penetration performance of an underwater shaped charge jet (USCJ) under the influence of an intervening water layer was studied by combining experimental and numerical simulation methods, considering the effects of initiation manners and standoff distance. First, the USCJ formation and its penetration performance tests were carried out, which were used to verify the reliability of the numerical simulation. Then, the formation and penetration processes of the shaped charge jet were analyzed experimentally and numerically. The results showed that during the penetration of the intervening water layer, the high-speed and high-energy jet head was engulfed by the water layer. A 30 mm intervening water layer reduces the kinetic energy of USCJ by approximately 13.6% and its penetration performance by 12.8%. The depth of penetration (DOP) of the USCJ decreases with increasing water layer thickness, and its decreasing trend gradually slows down. The DOPs of USCJ under annular and surface initiation manners are greater than those under central initiation. When the annular initiation radius increases, the accumulation effect of the USCJ weakens, and the overall velocity and kinetic energy increase, resulting in a significant increase in DOP. The DOP of USCJ increases initially and then decreases with an increase in the standoff distance; however, an increase in the water layer thickness reduces the optimal standoff distance. While the water layer reduces DOP, it also has a certain effect on the standoff distance. A certain thickness of the water layer is beneficial for the improvement of the DOP when the standoff distance is small.

Keywords

Underwater shaped charge jet / Water layer / Initiation manner / Standoff distance / Penetration performance

References

[1] Bardiani J, Lomazzi L, Sbarufatti C, Manes A (2025) A machine learning-based tool to correlate coupled and uncoupled numerical simulations for submerged plates subjected to underwater explosions. Journal of Marine Science and Application. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-025-00624-5

[2] CaoJZ, LiangLH. Demonstration of numerically simulating figures for underwater explosions. Proceedings of the 24th International Congress on High-Speed Photography and Photonics, Sendai, Japan, 20014183

[3] ChenX, LuYG. Research on the influences of motion characteristics of jetting projectile charge under water. Defence Technology, 2024, 33: 411-425.

[4] FuhsAE, BuckJA, HallenbeckAE, StrottJB. Metal combustion in steam. Naval Engineers Journal, 2010, 97(3): 65-79.

[5] GuYC, WangJX, LiH, LiuLT, TangK, MaT, LinSJ. Comparative study on the forming characteristics and penetration effects of shaped charge jet in water and air. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023, 13311115901.

[6] GuYC, WangJX, LiH, TangK, LiuLT. Formation characteristics and penetration performance of an underwater shaped charge jet. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 258111695.

[7] GuoM, ZuXD, ShenXJ, HuangZX. Study on liquid-filled structure target with shaped charge vertical penetration. Defence Technology, 2019, 15(6): 861-867.

[8] GuoZT, ChenT, MuZC, ZhangW. An investigation into container constraint effects on the cavity characteristics due to high-speed projectile water entry. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 210107449.

[9] HeldM. Refined shaped charge jet penetration measurement in various materials. Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Ballistics, 198718

[10] HeldM. Verification of the equation for radial crater growth by shaped charge jet penetration. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 17(1–3): 387-398.

[11] HeldM, BackofenJE. Penetration of shaped charge into water. 12th International Symposium on Ballistics, San Antonio, 19903040

[12] HeldM, HuangNS, JiangD, ChangCC. Determination of the crater radius as a function of time of a shaped charge jet that penetrates water. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, 1996, 21(2): 64-69.

[13] HolmquistTJ, TempletonDW, BishnoiKD. Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, high-strain rate, and high-pressure applications. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 25(3): 211-231.

[14] HussainG, HameedA, HetheringtonJG, MalikAQ, SanaullahK. The explosively formed projectile (EFP) as a standoff sea mine neutralization device. Journal of Energetic Materials, 2013, 31(2): 100-114.

[15] LamC, McqueenD. Study of the penetration of water by an explosively formed projectile. Defence Science and Technology Organization, 1998, 2119

[16] LeeES, OhKH, SongSY. Penetration of particulated shaped-charge jet into water. 21st International Congress on High-Speed Photography & Photonics, 1995975981.

[17] LiL, HanB, HeSY, ZhaoZY, ZhangR, ZhangQC, LuTJ. Shock loading simulation using density-graded metallic foam projectiles. Materials & Design, 2019, 164107546.

[18] LiYB, WangJX, LiuZT, TangK, WangHF, ChenXW. Orthogonal optimization design and experiments on explosively formed projectiles with fins. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2023, 173104462.

[19] LiuFThe explosively formed penetrator and its engineering damage effects research, 2006, Hefei. University of Science and Technology of China. (in Chinese)

[20] LiuNN, RenSF, SongDD, LiuLT. Damage research of shaped charge jet on warship broadside. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2020, 24(8): 1072-1080(in Chinese)

[21] MaSX, LiXD, ZhouLW. Experimental and numerical investigation of cavity characteristics in behind-armor liquid-filled containers under shaped charge jet impact. Defence Technology, 2025, 47: 242-259.

[22] MaT, WangJX, LiuLT, LiH, TangK, GuYC, ZhangYF. Study on structural response of water-back plate under the combined action of shock wave and bubble loads generated by cylindrical charge in deep-water environment. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 194111307.

[23] QianZH, YangTM, LiuMB. An overview of coupled Lagrangian–Eulerian methods for ocean engineering. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2024, 23: 366-397.

[24] ShiJ, HuangZX, ZuXD, XiaoQQ. Experimental and numerical investigation of jet performance based on Johnson-Cook model of liner material. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 170104343.

[25] ShimamuraK, OotsukaT. Study of water entry of high-speed projectile. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 58: 232-239.

[26] SteinbergDJ, CochranSG, GuinanMW. A constitutive model for metals applicable at high-strain rate. Journal of Applied Physics, 1980, 51(3): 1498-1504.

[27] TangK, WangJX, LiuLT, YangM. Study on the mechanism of secondary penetration of long rod and its influencing factors. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(12): 3707-3718(in Chinese)

[28] TangK, WangJX, SongHP, ZhouN. Investigation on the penetration of jacketed rods with striking velocities of 0.9–3.3 km/s into semi-infinite targets. Defence Technology, 2022, 18(3): 476-489.

[29] WangHF, JiangZR, YuWM, LiuZW. Behavior of jetting penetrator charge operating underwater. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2006, 26(3): 189-192(in Chinese)

[30] WangYJ, LiWB, WangXM, LiWB. Numerical simulation and experimental study on flight characteristics and penetration against spaced targets of EFP in water. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 25(6): 459-465(in Chinese)

[31] WuJY, ZhongMS, LiuY, XieXB, JiC. Study on the influencing factors of underwater unexploded ordnance destruction based on shaped charged jet. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 15073032007

[32] XuLY, TianY, LiuXB, WangSP. Numerical investigation on jet penetration capacity of hypervelocity shaped charge in underwater explosion. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 281114668.

[33] YangL, ZhangQM, JuYY. Experimental study on the penetration of explosively formed projectile against water-partitioned armor. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2009, 29(3): 197-200(in Chinese)

[34] ZhangXR, WuC, HuangFL. Penetration of shaped charge jets with tungsten–copper and copper liners at the same explosive-to-liner mass ratio into water. Shock Waves, 2010, 20(3): 263-267.

[35] ZhangYF, LiuLT, WangJX, TangK, MaT. Study on the impact characteristics of underwater explosion bubble jets induced by plate structure. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266112641.

[36] ZhangZF, LiHL, ZhangJY, WangLK, ZhangGY, ZongZ. Characterization of underwater explosive loads of blasting and shaped charges. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2024, 23(2): 302-315.

[37] ZhangZF, WangC, XuWL, HuHL. Penetration of annular and general jets into underwater plates. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2020, 8(2): 289-296.

[38] ZhangZF, WangC, XuWL, HuHL, GuoYC. Application of a new type of annular shaped charge in penetration into underwater double-hull structure. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 159104057.

[39] ZhangZF, WangLK, MingFR, VadimVS, ChenHL. Application of smoothed particle hydrodynamics in analysis of shaped-charge jet penetration caused by underwater explosion. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 145: 177-187.

[40] ZhangZF, WangLK, VadimVS. Damage response of steel plate to underwater explosion: Effect of shaped charge liner. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 103: 38-49.

[41] ZhangZF, YangSX, ZhangSH, WangLK, SuiYT, LiT, ZhangGY. Experimental study of damage to double-hull structure by underwater explosions of three charge types-blasting, shaped, and linear shaped charges. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2025, 203105369.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.