Progress in Offshore Oilfield Development Planning

L. M. R. Silva , C. Guedes Soares

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) : 136 -161.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2026, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1) :136 -161. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-025-00730-4
Review
review-article

Progress in Offshore Oilfield Development Planning

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study examines the methods to plan the development of offshore oilfields over the years, which are used to support the decision-making on the development of offshore oilfields. About 100 papers are analysed and categorised into different groups of main early-stage decisions. The present study stands in contrast to the contributions of the operations research and system engineering review articles, on the one hand, and the petroleum engineering review articles, on the other. This is because it does not focus on one methodological approach, nor does it limit the literature analysis by offshore oilfield characteristics. Consequently, the present analysis may offer valuable insights, for instance, by identifying environmental planning decisions as a recent yet highly significant concern that is currently being imposed on decision-making process. Thus, it is evident that the incorporation of safety criteria within the technical-economic decision-making process for the design of production systems would be a crucial requirement at development phase.

Keywords

Offshore oilfield development / Oilfield planning decisions / Production system design / Decision-making process

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
L. M. R. Silva, C. Guedes Soares. Progress in Offshore Oilfield Development Planning. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2026, 25(1): 136-161 DOI:10.1007/s11804-025-00730-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Almedallah MK, Branch G, Walsh SDC. Combined well path, submarine pipeline network, route and flow rate optimization for shallow-water offshore fields. Appl. Ocean Res., 2020, 105: 102396

[2]

Amir-Heidari P, Raie M. Response planning for accidental oil spills in Persian Gulf: A decision support system (DSS) based on consequence modeling. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2019, 140: 116-128

[3]

Amir-Heidari P, Raie M. Probabilistic risk assessment of oil spill from offshore oil wells in Persian Gulf. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2018, 136: 291-299

[4]

Bai Y, Bai Q. Subsea engineering handbook, 20101st ed

[5]

Barnes RJ, Kokossis A, Shang Z. An integrated mathematical programming approach for the design and optimisation of offshore fields. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2007, 31: 612-629

[6]

Beale EML. A mathematical programming model for the long term development of an off-shore gas field. Discret. Appl. Math., 1983, 5: 1-9

[7]

Beemaraj SB, Muhammed B, Joshi A, Coche E, Chanet A. A framework for early-stage automated layout design of subsea production system. Ocean Eng., 2024, 297: 117175

[8]

Bergmo PES, Holt T. CO2 capture from offshore oil installations: An evaluation of alternative methods for deposition with emphasis on carbonated water injection. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., 2024, 11: 100184

[9]

Bhattacharyya SK, Cheliyan AS. Optimization of a subsea production system for cost and reliability using its fault tree model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2019, 185: 213-219

[10]

Bilal PM, Stanko M, Sales L. Differential evolution for early-phase offshore oilfield design considering uncertainties in initial oil-in-place and well productivity. Upstream Oil Gas Technol., 2021, 7: 100055

[11]

Bittencourt AC, Horne RN. Reservoir development and design optimization. Proc. -SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib. San Antonio, 1997

[12]

Blanco VLA, Gallo WLR. Diagnosis of GHG emissions in an offshore oil and gas production facility. Gases, 2024, 4: 351-370

[13]

Camponogara E, Machado AS, Silva TL, Giuliani CM, Vieira BF, Teixeira AF. Derivative-free optimization of offshore production platforms sharing a subsea gas network. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51: 185-190

[14]

Carneiro PRF, Fasca H, Cordeiro M, Martingil M, do Valle LV, de Souza MIL, Salomon PS. A methodological approach for an objective environmental impact assessment to support the decision-making in the decommissioning of oil and gas subsea installations in Brazil. J. Nat. Conserv., 2024, 79: 126619

[15]

Carvalho MCA, Pinto JM. An MILP model and solution technique for the planning of infrastructure in offshore oilfields. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2006, 51: 97-110

[16]

Cavalcanti EJC, Ribeiro TJS, Carvalho M. Exergoenvironmental analysis of a combined cycle power plant fueled by natural gas from an offshore platform. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, 2021, 46: 101245

[17]

Chang Y, Bouzarkouna Z, Devegowda D. Multi-objective optimization for rapid and robust optimal oilfield development under geological uncertainty. Comput. Geosci., 2015, 19: 933-950

[18]

Chen D, Chen L, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Wen P. Decommissioning offshore oil and gas facilities in China: Process and environmental impacts. Ocean Eng., 2024, 296: 116887

[19]

Coats BK, Fleming GC, Watts JW, Ramé M, Shiralkar GS. A generalized wellbore and surface facility model, fully coupled to a reservoir simulator. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng., 2004, 7: 132-142

[20]

Coutinho LC, Império M, Angelkorte G, da Silva GN, Bergman-Fonte C, Draeger R, Cunha BSL, Rochedo PRR, Szklo A, Schaeffer R. Climate strategies for oil and gas production under the lens of an Integrated Assessment Model: The case of Brazil. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2024, 137: 104231

[21]

da Silva JAM, de Oliveira Junior S. Unit exergy cost and CO2 emissions of offshore petroleum production. Energy, 2018, 147: 757-766

[22]

Darche G, Marmier R, Samier P, Bursaux R, Guillonneau N, Long J, Kalunga H, Zaydullin R, Cao H. Integrated asset modeling of a deep-offshore subsea development using 2 complementary reservoir-surface coupling workflows. SPE Reserv. Simul. Symp. Proc. Galveston, 2019

[23]

Dbouk HM, Hayek H, Ghorayeb K. Modular approach for optimal pipeline layout. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2021, 197: 107934

[24]

Devine MD, Lesso WG. Models for the minimum cost development of offshore oil fields. Manage. Sci., 1972, 18: 378-387

[25]

Durrer EJ, Slater GE. Optimization of petroleum and natural gas production-a survey. Manage. Sci., 1997, 24: 35-43

[26]

Ebadat A, Karimaghaee P. Well placement optimization according to field production curve using gradient-based control methods through dynamic modeling. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2012, 100: 178-188

[27]

El-Mahdy OFM, Ahmed MEH, Metwalli S. Computer aided optimization of natural gas pipe networks using genetic algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. J., 2010, 10: 1141-1150

[28]

Emanuel AS, Ranney JC. Studies of offshore reservoir with an interfaced reservoir/piping network simulator. J. Pet. Technol., 1981, 33: 399-406

[29]

Epelle EI, Gerogiorgis DI. Optimal rate allocation for production and injection wells in an oil and gas field for enhanced profitability. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 65: 1-23

[30]

Ferreira N, Dziedzic R, Albuquerque C, de Oliveira Junior S, Lloyd S, Martins MR. Introduction of a carbon footprint assessment in the oil and gas facility life extension decision-making process. Geoenergy Sci. Eng., 2024, 240: 213032

[31]

Forouzanfar F, Reynolds AC, Li G. Optimization of the well locations and completions for vertical and horizontal wells using a derivative-free optimization algorithm. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2012, 86–87: 272-288

[32]

Frair L, Devine M. Economic optimization of offshore petroleum development. Manage. Sci., 1975, 21: 1370-1379

[33]

Gao X, Xie Y, Wang S, Wu M, Wang Y, Tan C, Zuo X, Chen T. Offshore oil production planning optimization: An MINLP model considering well operation and flow assurance. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2020, 133: 106674

[34]

González D, Stanko M, Hoffmann A. Decision support method for early-phase design of offshore hydrocarbon fields using model-based optimization. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 2020, 10: 1473-1495

[35]

Grossmann IE, Apap RM, Calfa BA, García-herreros P, Zhang Q. Recent advances in mathematical programming techniques for the optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2016, 91: 3-14

[36]

Gunnerud V, Foss B. Oil production optimization-A piecewise linear model, solved with two decomposition strategies. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2010, 34: 1803-1812

[37]

Gunnerud V, Foss BA, McKinnon KIM, Nygreen B. Oil production optimization solved by piecewise linearization in a Branch & Price framework. Comput. Oper. Res., 2012, 39: 2469-2477

[38]

Guo W, Zhang S, Wu G. Quantitative oil spill risk from offshore fields in the Bohai Sea, China. Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 688: 494-504

[39]

Guo Y, Mu G, Zhou Z, Yang Y, Yang W, Ma C. Research on the assessment method of oil spill environmental risks of offshore oil facilities. Aquat. Procedia, 2015, 3: 224-230

[40]

Gupta V, Grossmann IE. Multistage stochastic programming approach for offshore oilfield infrastructure planning under production sharing agreements and endogenous uncertainties. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2014, 124: 180-197

[41]

Gupta V, Grossmann IE. An efficient multiperiod MINLP model for optimal planning of offshore oil and gas field infrastructure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51: 6823-6840

[42]

Hansen P, de Luna Pedrosa Filho E, Carneiro Ribeiro C. Location and sizing of offshore platforms for oil exploration. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1992, 58: 202-214

[43]

Hansen RL, Rickey WP. Evolution of subsea production systems: A worldwide overview. Proc. Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf. 1995-Augus, 1995675680

[44]

Haugen KK. A stochastic dynamic programming model for scheduling of offshore petroleum fields with resource uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1996, 88: 88-100

[45]

Haugland D, Hallefjord A, Asheim H. Models for petroleum field exploitation. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1988, 37: 58-72

[46]

Hoffmann A, Stanko M, González D. Optimized production profile using a coupled reservoir-network model. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 2019, 9: 2123-2137

[47]

Hong C, Estefen SF, Wang Y, Lourenço MI. Mixed-integer nonlinear programming model for layout design of subsea satellite well system in deep water oil field. Autom. Constr., 2021, 123: 103524

[48]

Hong C, Estefen SF, Wang Y, Lourenço MI. An integrated optimization model for the layout design of a subsea production system. Appl. Ocean Res., 2018, 77: 1-13

[49]

Hong C, Wang Y, Estefen SF. A MINLP model for the layout design of subsea oil gathering-transportation system in deep water oil field considering avoidance of subsea obstacles and pipe intersections. Ocean Eng., 2023, 277: 114278

[50]

Iyer RR, Grossmann IE, Vasantharajan S, Cullick AS. Optimal planning and scheduling of offshore oil field infrastructure investment and operations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37: 1380-1397

[51]

Khor CS, Elkamel A, Shah N. Optimization methods for petroleum fields development and production systems: a review. Optim. Eng., 2017, 18: 907-941

[52]

Kolian SR, Godec M, Sammarco PW. Alternate uses of retired oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2019, 167: 52-59

[53]

Lei G, Stanko M, Silva TL. Formulations for automatic optimization of decommissioning timing in offshore oil and gas field development planning. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2022, 165: 107910

[54]

Li P, Cai Q, Lin W, Chen B, Zhang B. Offshore oil spill response practices and emerging challenges. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2016, 110: 6-27

[55]

Li Z, Zhang H, Meng J, Long Y, Yan Y, Li M, Huang Z, Liang Y. Reducing carbon footprint of deep-sea oil and gas field exploitation by optimization for Floating Production Storage and Offloading. Appl. Energy, 2020, 261: 114398

[56]

Lin X, Floudas CA. A novel continuous-time modeling and optimization framework for well platform planning problems. Optim. Eng., 2003, 4: 65-95

[57]

Liu H, Gjersvik TB, Faanes A. Subsea field layout optimization (part II) -the location-allocation problem of manifolds. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2022, 208: 109336

[58]

Liu H, Gjersvik TB, Faanes A. Subsea field layout optimization (Part I) —directional well trajectory planning based on 3D Dubins Curve. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2022, 208: 109450

[59]

Lucena RR, De Baioco JS, Souza B, Pires L, Albrecht CH, Jacob BP. Optimal design of submarine pipeline routes by genetic algorithm with different constraint handling techniques. Adv. Eng. Softw., 2014, 76: 110-124

[60]

Luna-Ortiz E, Lawrence P, Pantelides CC, Adjiman CS, Immanuel CD. An integrated framework for model-based flow assurance in deep-water oil and gas production. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., 2008, 25: 787-792

[61]

Min C, Hu Y, Hou C, He J, Liu Z. A bi-level programming model for oilfield development and its solution algorithm based on interactive intuitionistic fuzzy method. Procedia Comput. Sci., 2020, 162: 215-226

[62]

Mohammadzaheri M, Tafreshi R, Khan Z, Franchek M, Grigoriadis K. An intelligent approach to optimize multiphase subsea oil fields lifted by electrical submersible pumps. J. Comput. Sci., 2016, 15: 50-59

[63]

Muhammed B, Beemaraj SB, Joshi A, Chanet A, Coche E. A novel approach for early-stage automated flowline design. Ocean Eng., 2023, 277: 114351

[64]

Nguyen T, Van Barbosa YM, da Silva JAM, de Oliveira Junior S. A novel methodology for the design and optimisation of oil and gas offshore platforms. Energy, 2019, 185: 158-175

[65]

Nguyen T, Van Tock L, Breuhaus P, Maréchal F, Elmegaard B. CO2-mitigation options for the offshore oil and gas sector. Appl. Energy, 2016, 161: 673-694

[66]

Nygreen B, Christiansen M, Haugen K, Bjørkvoll T, Kristiansen Ø. Modeling Norwegian petroleum production and transportation. Ann. Oper. Res., 1998, 82: 251-267

[67]

Ortíz-Gómez A, Rico-Ramirez V, Hernández-Castro S. Mixed-integer multiperiod model for the planning of oilfield production. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2002, 26: 703-714

[68]

Redutskiy Y. Oilfield development and operations planning under geophysical uncertainty. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv., 2017, 9: 10-27

[69]

Riboldi L, Nord LO. Offshore power plants integrating a wind farm: Design optimisation and techno-economic assessment based on surrogate modelling. Processes, 2018, 6: 249

[70]

Rocha DM, Cardoso CDO, Borges RG, Baioco JS, Coutinho DDCES, Albrecht CH, Jacob BP. Optimization of submarine pipeline routes considering slope stability. Proc. Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., 2015, 1: 761-776

[71]

Rodrigues HWL, Prata BA, Bonates TO. Integrated optimization model for location and sizing of offshore platforms and location of oil wells. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2016, 145: 734-741

[72]

Rosa VR, Camponogara E, Filho VJMF. Design optimization of oilfield subsea infrastructures with manifold placement and pipeline layout. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2018, 108: 163-178

[73]

Sales L, Jäschke J, Stanko M. Early field planning using optimisation and considering uncertainties: Study case: Offshore deepwater field in Brazil. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2021, 207: 109058

[74]

Sales LDPA, Pitombeira-Neto AR, De Athayde Prata B. A genetic algorithm integrated with Monte Carlo simulation for the field layout design problem. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. -Rev. IFP Energies Nouv., 2018, 73: 24

[75]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. Optimisation of offshore oilfield development including the risk of failure of subsea manifolds. Ocean Eng., 2025, 324: 120668

[76]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. Safety and economic optimization of offshore production systems. Advances in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2024, 1: 87-94

[77]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. Robust optimization model of an offshore oil production system for cost and pipeline risk of failure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2023, 232: 109052

[78]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. A stochastic programming model for designing offshore production systems. Trends in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2022, 2: 545-552

[79]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. Guedes Soares C, A ST. Statistical analysis of the oil production profile of Campos’ basin in Brazil. Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2021, London, UK, Taylor and Francis775784

[80]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. Oilfield development system optimization under reservoir production uncertainty. Ocean Eng., 2021, 225: 108758

[81]

Silva LMR, Guedes Soares C. An integrated optimization of the floating and subsea layouts. Ocean Eng., 2019, 191: 106557

[82]

Silva LMR, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C. A methodology to quantify the risk of subsea pipeline systems at the oilfield development selection phase. Ocean Eng., 2019, 179: 213-225

[83]

Silva TL, Camponogara E. A computational analysis of multidimensional piecewise-linear models with applications to oil production optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2014, 232: 630-642

[84]

Stape P, Rapozo MF, Baioco JS, de Lima BSLP, Jacob BP, Rocha DM. Methodologies for automated design of subsea layout alternatives for oil production systems. Appl. Ocean Res., 2023, 139: 103706

[85]

Sullivan J. The application of mathematical programming methods to oil and gas field development planning. Math. Program, 1988, 42: 189-200

[86]

Tarhan B, Grossmann IE, Goel V. Stochastic programming approach for the planning of offshore oil or gas field infrastructure under decision-dependent uncertainty. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48: 3078-3097

[87]

Tavallali MS, Karimi IA, Baxendale D. Process systems engineering perspective on the planning and development of oil fields. AIChE J., 2016, 62: 2586-2604

[88]

van den Heever SA, Grossmann IE. An iterative aggregation/disaggregation approach for the solution of a mixed-integer nonlinear oilfield infrastructure planning model. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39: 1955-1971

[89]

van den Heever SA, Grossmann IE, Vasantharajan S, Edwards K. A lagrangean decomposition heuristic for the design and planning of offshore hydrocarbon field infrastructures with complex economic objectives. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2001, 40: 2857-2875

[90]

van den Heever SA, Grossmann IE, Vasantharajan S, Edwards K. Integrating complex economic objectives with the design and planning of offshore oilfield infrastructures. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2000, 24: 1049-1055

[91]

Vidal PCJ, González MOA, Melo DC, de Ferreira PO, Sampaio PVG, Lima LO. Conceptual framework for the decommissioning process of offshore oil and gas platforms. Mar. Struct., 2022, 85: 103262

[92]

Wang Y, Duan M, Feng J, Mao D, Xu M, Estefen SF. Modeling for the optimization of layout scenarios of cluster manifolds with pipeline end manifolds. Appl. Ocean Res., 2014, 46: 94-103

[93]

Wang Y, Duan M, Xu M, Wang D, Feng W. A mathematical model for subsea wells partition in the layout of cluster manifolds. Appl. Ocean Res., 2012, 36: 26-35

[94]

Wang Y, Estefen SF, Lourenço MI. A fully integrated reservoir/pipeline network model and its application on the evaluation of subsea water separation performance. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2023, 220: 111140

[95]

Wang Y, Estefen SF, Lourenço MI, Hong C. Optimal design and scheduling for offshore oil-field development. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2019, 123: 300-316

[96]

Wang Y, Gu J, Duan M, Xu M, Estefen SF. A new partition model for the optimization of subsea cluster manifolds based on the new definition of layout cost. J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 2016, 230: 3-12

[97]

Wang Y, Wang D, Duan M, Xu M, Cao J, Estefen SF. A mathematical solution of optimal partition of production loops for subsea wells in the layout of daisy chains. J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 2014, 228: 211-219

[98]

Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Yue Q, Zhang X. Optimization of subsea production facilities layout based on cluster manifold system considering seabed topography. Ocean Eng., 2024, 291: 116575

[99]

Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhang A, Qiu W, Duan M, Wang Q. A new optimization algorithm for the layout design of a subsea production system. Ocean Eng., 2021, 232: 109072

[100]

Wu J, Liu W, Li J, Han B, Tan Q, Lin H, Liu H. Artificial neural network prediction of wellbore stability in offshore shallow formations. Geoenergy Sci. Eng., 2024, 243: 213322

[101]

Zagonari F. Decommissioning vs. reusing offshore gas platforms within ethical decision-making for sustainable development: Theoretical framework with application to the Adriatic Sea. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2021, 199: 105409

[102]

Zanuttigh B, Dallavalle E, Zagonari F. A novel framework for sustainable decision-making on reusing oil & gas offshore platforms with application to the Adriatic Sea. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2025, 211: 115252

[103]

Zhang H, Liang Y, Zhang W, Wang B, Yan X, Liao Q. A unified MILP model for topological structure of production well gathering pipeline network. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2017, 152: 284-293

[104]

Zhang X, Liao Q, Wang Q, Wang L, Qiu R, Liang Y, Zhang H. How to promote zero-carbon oilfield target? A technical-economic model to analyze the economic and environmental benefits of Recycle-CCS-EOR project. Energy, 2021, 225: 120297

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/