Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning

Zhibo Liu , Zhikai Wang , Guangyao Chu , Xiongliang Yao

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6) : 1279 -1290.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2025, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6) :1279 -1290. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-025-00689-2
Research Article
research-article

Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Near-field underwater explosions can cause substantial damage to offshore ship structures, presenting considerable risks to their integrity. This study focused on rapidly predicting girder structure deformation in ship hulls subjected to near-field explosions from small equivalent-weight spherical charges underwater. The Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method (RKDG) was employed to calculate the explosive load generated by the spherical charge. This load was then applied to the nonlinear finite element solver software, ABAQUS, to determine the maximum deformation of the ship hull girder structure under the impulse load. By comparing the results with experimental data, the accuracy of the proposed model was validated, confirming that the RKDG finite element coupling calculation effectively simulates the response characteristics of spherical charges in near-field explosion scenarios. Subsequently, two machine learning algorithms driven by data, namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF), were employed to dynamically predict the maximum girder structure deformation in ship hulls. The analysis demonstrated that both models successfully predicted the maximum deformation. The root mean square error for the XGBoost model (27.67) was lower than that of the RF model (50.31). The XGBoost model also fitted 96% of the training data, compared to 94% for the RF model. Moreover, the relative error of the XGBoost model (6.25%) was lower than that of the RF model (10.38%). Overall, XGBoost is highly suitable for predicting girder structure deformation in ship hulls subjected to underwater explosions.

Keywords

Underwater explosion / Hull girder / Damage prediction / Discontinuous galerkin / Machine learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhibo Liu, Zhikai Wang, Guangyao Chu, Xiongliang Yao. Structural Deformation Prediction of Underwater Exploded Ship Hull Girder Using Machine Learning. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2025, 24(6): 1279-1290 DOI:10.1007/s11804-025-00689-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Cao XF, Xiao DB, Li Y, Wen WB, Zhao T, Chen ZB, Jiang YB, Fang DN. Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 148: 106586.

[2]

Cockburn B, Hou S, Shu CW. The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case. Mathematics of Computation, 1990, 54: 545-581

[3]

Cole RH. Underwater explosions, 1948, New York. Dover Publications.

[4]

Era IZ, Grandhi M, Liu Z. Prediction of mechanical behaviors of L-DED fabricated SS 316L parts via machine learning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 121(3–4): 2445-2459.

[5]

Gan N, Yao XL, Liu LT, Xiao W, Wang XL. Research on overall damage characteristics of a hull girder under explosion bubble collapse. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 188: 106315.

[6]

Gao F, Ji C, Long Y, Cheng L, Zhao C, Wu J, Sun Y. Numerical investigation of the dynamic response of CWC structures subjected to underwater explosion loading. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 203: 107214.

[7]

He Z, Chen Z, Jiang Y, Cao X, Zhao T, Li Y. Effects of the standoff distance on hull structure damage subjected to near-field underwater explosion. Marine Structures, 2020, 74: 102839.

[8]

Jiang X, Zhang W, Li D, Chen T, Tang Y, Guo Z. Experimental analysis on dynamic response of pre-cracked aluminum plate subjected to underwater explosion shock loadings. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 159: 107256.

[9]

Jin Z, Yin C, Chen Y, Hua H. Coupling Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method to finite element method for compressible multi-phase flow interacting with a deformable sandwich structure. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 130: 597-610.

[10]

Johnson GR, Cook WH. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 21(1): 31-48.

[11]

Li H, Zhang C, Zheng X, Mei Z, Bai X. A simplified theoretical model of the whipping response of a hull girder subjected to underwater explosion considering the damping effect. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 239: 109831.

[12]

Li H, Zhu Y, Liu K, Zou H, Chen X, Wang H. Experimental study of the coupled damage characteristics of a large-scale hull girder subjected to an underwater near-field explosion. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 196: 111547.

[13]

Lin S, Wang J, Liu L, Li H, Ma T, Tang K. Research on damage effect of underwater multipoint synchronous explosion shock waves on air-backed clamped circular plate. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 240: 109985.

[14]

Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF. Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1995, 20: 1081-1106.

[15]

Nurick GN, Shave GC. The deformation and tearing of thin square plates subjected to impulsive loads—an experimental study. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1996, 18: 99-116.

[16]

Park J. Application of the Runge Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin-Direct Ghost Fluid Method to internal explosion inside a water-filled tube. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2019, 11: 572-583.

[17]

Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011, 12: 2825-2830. DOI:

[18]

Peng YX, Zhang AM, Ming FR. Numerical simulation of structural damage subjected to the near-field underwater explosion based on SPH and RKPM. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 222: 108576.

[19]

Qiu J, Liu TG, Khoo BC. Simulations of compressible two-medium flow by Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods with the ghost fluid method. Communications in Computational Physics, 2008, 3: 479-504. DOI:

[20]

Rajendran R, Narasimhan K. Damage prediction of clamped circular plates subjected to contact underwater explosion. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 25: 373-386.

[21]

Sun PN, Colagrossi A, Marrone S, Zhang AM. The δplus-SPH model: Simple procedures for a further improvement of the SPH scheme. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 315: 25-49.

[22]

Suresh C, Ramajeyathilagam K. Large deformation behaviour of thin mild steel rectangular plates subjected to underwater explosion loading under air and water backed conditions. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 114: 102780.

[23]

Tang ZP, Li XY. Application of the Sub-Sea Analysis (SSA) capability in numerical simulation of underwater explosion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1965(1): 012042

[24]

Wang G, Zhang S, Yu M, Li H, Kong Y. Investigation of the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion near boundaries. Applied Ocean Research, 2014, 46: 40-53.

[25]

Wang P, Zhang Z, Yan Q, Zhang C. A substructure method for the transient response of vertical cylinders subjected to shock wave of underwater explosion. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 218: 108128.

[26]

Wang X, Zhang S, Wang C, Cui W, Cao K, Fang X. Blast-induced damage and evaluation method of concrete gravity dam subjected to near-field underwater explosion. Engineering Structures, 2020, 209: 109996.

[27]

Wei ZH, Zhao ZY, Ye F, Pei YQ, Wang X, Zhang QC, Lu TJ. Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41: 083104-083101

[28]

Wierzbicki T. Petalling of plates under explosive and impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22: 935-954.

[29]

Zhang QL, Huang XY, Li Z. Coupled acoustic-structural analysis of a partially submerged circular RC column in an underwater explosion event: Factors to be considered for loading. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 232: 109122.

[30]

Zhang W, Yao X, Wang Y, Wang Z. Experimental study and numerical model adequacy assessment of hull structure dynamic response subject to underwater explosion. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2020, 15: 1023-1036.

[31]

Zhang Z, Liu Z, Wu D. Prediction of melt pool temperature in directed energy deposition using machine learning. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 37: 101692.

[32]

Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhao H, Qian H, Mou J. An experimental study on the dynamic response of a hull girder subjected to near field underwater explosion. Marine Structures, 2015, 44: 43-60.

[33]

Zong Z, Zhao Y, Li H. A numerical study of whole ship structural damage resulting from close-in underwater explosion shock. Marine Structures, 2013, 31: 24-43.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

12

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/