Optimizing Geometric Parameters of Planing Vessels for Enhanced Hydrodynamic Performance

Abstract

The hydrodynamic performance of high-speed planing hulls has gained considerable interest, with recent advancements in computational fluid dynamics and hull design techniques enhancing the understanding of planing hull hydrodynamics. In this study, we conducted a numerical investigation using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach with overset grids to capture large motions at high speeds. This study aims to improve the hydrodynamic performances of planing hulls, specifically focusing on total resistance, trim, and sinkage. The initial Fridsma hull with a deadrise angle of 20° has been used for validation, demonstrating good agreement with measurements at different Froude numbers. Subsequently, new configurations based on the Fridsma hull have been designed by varying the deadrise angle, number of chines, and transverse steps. Our findings reveal a correlation between the deadrise angle, the number of chines, and the Froude number. As the deadrise angle increases, total resistance also increases. Additionally, a single chine yields superior results at higher Froude numbers, while multiple chines offer advantages at lower values. The introduction of transverse steps consistently increases total resistance, highlighting their role in improving planing hull performance. This research not only offers valuable insights into planing hull design but also leverages state-of-the-art numerical methods to advance the understanding of hydrodynamic behaviors at high ship speeds.

References

[1] Begovic E, Bertorello C. Resistance assessment of warped hull form Ocean Engineering, 2012, 56: 28-42.

[2] De Luca F, Pensa C. The Naples warped hard chine hulls systematic series Ocean Engineering, 2017, 139: 205-236.

[3] Esfandiari A, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. Comparison between the dynamic behavior of the non-stepped and double-stepped planing hulls in rough water: A numerical study Journal of Ship Production and Design, 2020, 36(1): 52-66.

[4] Faltinsen OM Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles, 2005

[5] Fridsma G A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats, 1969 New Jersey, United States Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology.

[6] ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications International Towing Tank Conference, 2011([Accessed on Aug. 31, 2021])

[7] Kahramanoğlu E, Çakıcı F, Doğrul A. Numerical prediction of the vertical responses of planing hulls in regular head waves Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(6): 455.

[8] Lakatos M, Sahk T, Andreasson H, Tabri K. The effect of spray rails, chine strips and V-shaped spray interceptors on the performance of low planing high-speed craft in calm water Applied Ocean Research, 2022, 122: 103131.

[9] Matveev KI, Morabito M. Hydrodynamics of planing surfaces with negative deadrise angles Ocean Engineering, 2020, 212: 107601.

[10] Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 2003, 4(1): 625-632

[11] Morabito MG. Empirical equations for planing hull bottom pressures Journal of Ship research, 2014, 58(4): 185-200.

[12] Mousaviraad SM, Wang Z, Stern F. URANS studies of hydrodynamic performance and slamming loads on high-speed planing hulls in calm water and waves for deep and shallow conditions Applied Ocean Research, 2015, 51: 222-240.

[13] Savitsky D. Hydrodynamic design of planning hulls Marine Technology and Sname News, 1964, 1(4): 71-95.

[14] Savitsky D, DeLorme MF, Datla R. Inclusion of whisker spray drag in performance prediction method for high-speed planing hulls Marine Technology and Sname News, 2007, 44(1): 35-56.

[15] Savitsky D, Morabito M. Surface wave contours associated with the forebody wake of stepped planing hulls Marine Technology and Sname news, 2010, 47(1): 1-16.

[16] Stern F, Wilson RV, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 1: Methodology and procedures J. Fluids Eng., 2001, 123(4): 793-802.

[17] Sukas OF, Kinaci OK, Cakici F, Gokce MK. Hydrodynamic assessment of planing hulls using overset grids Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 65: 35-46.

[18] Taunton DJ, Hudson DA, Shenoi RA. Characteristics of a series of high speed hard chine planing hulls—Part 1: Performance in calm water International Journal of Small Craft Technology, 2010, 152: 55-75

[19] Vitiello L, Mancini S, Bilandi RN, Dashtimanesh A, De Luca F, Nappo V. A comprehensive stepped planing hull systematic series: Part 1 - Resistance test Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112242.

[20] Wang H, Zhu R, Huang S, Zha L, Gu M. A study on hydrodynamic characteristics of a planing hull by CFD simulation and modified MS method Ships and Offshore Structures, 2023, 18(2): 157-174.

[21] Wang H, Zhu R, Zha L, Gu M. Experimental and numerical investigation on the resistance characteristics of a high-speed planing catamaran in calm water Ocean Engineering, 2022, 258: 111837.

[22] Yousefi R, Shafaghat R, Shakeri M. High-speed planing hull drag reduction using tunnels Ocean engineering, 2014, 84: 54-60.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature