Discussion on “Data-driven Methods to Predict the Burst Strength of Corroded Line Pipelines Subjected to Internal Pressure https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00263-0”

References

[1] Abdelghani M, Tewfik G, Djahida D, Sid Ahmed S. Prediction of the rupture pressure of transmission pipelines with corrosion defects. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2018, 140(4): 041701

[2] ASMEManual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, 1984ANSI/ASME B31G-1984

[3] ASMEManual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, 1991ASME B31G-1991

[4] Benjamin AC, Freire J, Vieira RD, de Castro JT. Burst tests on pipeline with nonuniform depth corrosion defects. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 200251-57

[5] Benjamin AC, Vieira RD, Freire JLF, de Castro JT. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion. 3rd International Pipeline Conference, 2000V002T06A013

[6] Cabral HL, Willmersdorf RB, Afonso SM, Lyra PR, De Andrade EQ. Development of computational tools for automatic modeling and FE analysis of corroded pipelines. International Journal of Modeling and Simulation for the Petroleum Industry, 2007, 1(1): 9-22

[7] Cai J, Jiang X, Yang Y, Lodewijks G, Wang M. Data-driven methods to predict the burst strength of corroded line pipelines subjected to internal pressure. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2022, 21(2): 115-132

[8] Callister WDMaterials science and engineering, 1997

[9] Chen BQ, Videiro PM, Guedes Soares C. Opportunities and challenges to develop digital twins for subsea pipelines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(6): 739

[10] Chena Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li X, Zhou J. Failure analysis of high strength pipeline with single and multiple corrosions. Materials and Design, 2015, 67: 552-557

[11] Choi J, Goo B, Kim J, Kim Y, Kim W. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2003, 80(2): 121-128

[12] Cronin D, Pick R. Experimental database for corroded pipe: evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G. Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference, 2000V002T06A010

[13] CSAGas pipeline systems, 2007Z662-07

[14] DNVGLCorroded pipelines, 2017DNVGL-RP-F101

[15] DNVGLSubmarine pipeline systems, 2017DNVGL-ST-F101

[16] Freire JLF, Vieira RD, Castro JTP, Benjamin AC. Part 3: Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Experimental Techniques, 2006, 30(6): 60-65

[17] Gao J, Yang P, Li X, Zhou J, Liu J. Analytical prediction of failure pressure for pipeline with long corrosion defect. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191: 106497

[18] Kiefner JF, Vieth PHA modified criterion for evaluating the remaining strength of corroded pipe, 1989OH (USA)Battelle Columbus Div. PR-3-805

[19] Kiefner JF, Vieth PH. New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 88: 32

[20] Leis B, Stephens D. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe-part I: current status. The Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 1997

[21] Mok D, Pick R, Glover A, Hoff R. Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1991, 46(2): 195-216

[22] Mokhtari M, Melchers RE. Advanced numerical method for failure assessment of corroded steel pipes. 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, 2016

[23] Mokhtari M, Melchers RE. A new approach to assess the remaining strength of corroded steel pipes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018, 93: 144-156

[24] Mokhtari M, Melchers RE. Next-generation fracture prediction models for pipes with localized corrosion defects. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 105: 610-626

[25] Mondal BC, Dhar AS. Burst pressure of corroded pipelines considering combined axial forces and bending moments. Engineering Structures, 2019, 186: 43-51

[26] Motta R, Afonso SM, Willmersdorf RB, Lyra PR, de Andrade EQ. Automatic modeling and analysis of pipelines with colonies of corrosion defects. Mecánica Computacional, 2010, 29(80): 7871-7890

[27] Mustaffa Z, van Gelder P. A review and probabilistic analysis of limit state functions of corroded pipelines. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2010626-632

[28] Netto TA, Ferraz US, Estefen SF. The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61: 1185-1204

[29] Pimentel JT, Marques Ferreira AD, de Siqueira Motta R, Figueiroa da Silva Cabral MA, Maria Bastos Afonso S, Brito Willmersdorf R, Maciel Lyra PR, de Andrade EQ, da Silveira Cunha DJ. New procedure of automatic modeling of pipelines with realistic shaped corrosion defects. Engineering Structures, 2020, 221: 11030

[30] Silva R, Guerreiro J, Drach P. Automatic finite element solid modeling, burst and error analyses of corroded pipelines. International Journal of Mechanics, 2008, 2(3): 77-86

[31] Stephens DR, Leis BN. Material and geometry factors controlling the failure of corrosion defects in piping. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Pressure Vessels and Piping Division PVP, 1997, 350: 3-11

[32] Stephens DR, Leis BN, Kurre M. Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to high-toughness pipe. 3rd International Pipeline Conference, 2000V002T06A012

[33] Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C, Netto TA, Estefen SF. Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2008, 85(4): 228-237

[34] Yeom KJ, Lee Y-K, Oh KH, Kim WS. Integrity assessment of a corroded API X70 pipe with a single defect by burst pressure analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2015, 57: 553-561

[35] Zhou W, Huang G. Model error assessments of burst capacity models for corroded pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2012, 99: 1-8

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature