Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Performance Impact of Novel Appendage on Rim-driven Thruster

Hengxu Yang , Dongqin Li , Feng Zhang

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› : 1 -14.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› :1 -14. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-024-00475-6
Research Article

Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Performance Impact of Novel Appendage on Rim-driven Thruster

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Addressing the ongoing challenge of enhancing propulsion efficiency in rim-driven thrusters (RDTs), a novel energy-saving appendage was designed to mitigate energy dissipation and improve efficiency. Computational fluid dynamics was utilized to examine the disparities in open-water performance between RDTs with and without this appendage. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations were solved using the Moving Reference Frame approach within the established STAR-CCM+ software. The accuracy of these methodologies was confirmed through a comparison of numerical simulations with experimental data. A meticulous analysis evaluated the alterations in propulsion efficiency of RDTs pre- and post-appendage integration across various advance coefficients. Additionally, a comprehensive assessment of thrust and torque coefficient distributions facilitated a comprehensive understanding of the appendage’s energy-saving potential. Results demonstrated that the new appendage diminishes the diffusive wake behind the rotor disk, fostering a more uniform flow distribution. A notable reduction in the low-pressure zone on the rotor blade’s thrust side was observed, accompanied by an elevation in the high-pressure area. This generated a distinct pressure disparity between the blade’s thrust and suction sides, mitigating the low-pressure region at the blade tip and reducing the likelihood of cavitation. The manuscript further elucidates the rationale behind these alterations, providing detailed insights into flow field dynamics.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hengxu Yang, Dongqin Li, Feng Zhang. Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Performance Impact of Novel Appendage on Rim-driven Thruster. Journal of Marine Science and Application 1-14 DOI:10.1007/s11804-024-00475-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BhattacharyyaA, KrasilnikovV, SteenS. A CFD-based scaling approach for ducted propellers. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 123: 116-130

[2]

CaiM, YangC, WuS, ZhuY, XieY. Hydrodynamic analysis of a rim-driven thruster based on RANS method. OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington, 2015PiscatawayIEEE1-5

[3]

CaoQM, HongFW, TangDH, HuFL, LuLZ. Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2012, 24: 50-57

[4]

ÇelikF, GünerM. Energy saving device of stator for marine propellers. Ocean Engineering, 2007, 34(5–6): 850-855

[5]

CoacheS, Meis FernandezM. ESD design for a validation bulk carrier. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2017, 63(3–4): 211-226

[6]

DangJ, DongG, ChenH. An exploratory study on the working principles of energy saving devices (ESDs). Symposium on Green Ship Technology (Greenship’2011), 2011

[7]

DubasAJ, BressloffNW, SharkhSM. Numerical modelling of rotor-stator interaction in rim driven thrusters. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 106: 281-288

[8]

FangG, QianZ, JiangJ. Research on sheet cavitation numerical predicted and estimation of tip vortex cavitation inception of ducted propeller with preswirl stator. Ship Sci Technol, 2016, 38: 26-29

[9]

GaggeroS. Numerical design of a RIM-driven thruster using a RANS-based optimization approach. Applied Ocean Research, 2020, 94: 101941

[10]

GoJS, YoonHS, JungJH. Effects of a duct before a propeller on propulsion performance. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 136: 54-66

[11]

ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. ITTC–recommended procedures and guidelines. International Towing Tank Conference 26th ITTC specialist committee on CFD in marine hydrodynamics, 20111-18

[12]

KimJH, ChoiJE, ChoiBJ, ChungSH, SeoHW. Development of energy-saving devices for a full slow-speed ship through improving propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2015, 7(2): 390-398

[13]

KinnasS, ChangS-H, HeL, JohannessenJT. Performance prediction of a cavitating rim driven tunnel thruster. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. Norway, 2009, 28(1): 72-82

[14]

KoushanK, KrasilnikovV, NatalettiM, SileoL, SpenceS. Experimental and numerical study of pre-swirl stators PSS. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 47

[15]

LeeJT, KimMC, SuhJC, KimSH, ChoiJK. Development of a preswirl Statorpropeller system for improvement of propulsion efficiency: A symmetric stator propulsion system. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 1992, 29(4): 132-145

[16]

LiuB, YanX, OuyangW, LanJ, LiangX. Research on regular pattern of gap flow in shaftless rim-driven thruster. 2017 4th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), 2017134-138 2017

[17]

MewisF, PetersH. Power savings through a novel fin system. SMSSH Conference, 19869

[18]

MewisF. A novel power-saving device for full-form vessels. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP’09), 2009

[19]

MewisF. Development of a novel power-saving device for full-form vessels, 200811International Maritime Journal

[20]

NaderyA, GhassemiH. Hydrodynamic performance of the ship propeller under oscillating flow with and without stator. Am J Civ Eng Architect., 2020, 8(2): 56-61

[21]

NowruziH, NajafiA. An experimental and CFD study on the effects of different pre-swirl ducts on propulsion performance of series 60 ship. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 173: 491-509

[22]

PengY, WangY, LiuC, YiW. Comparative analysis of the hydrodynamic performance of front-stator and rear-stator pumpjets. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2019, 40(1): 132-140

[23]

ShinYJ, KimMC, LeeWJ, LeeKW, LeeJH. Numerical and experimental investigation of performance of the asymmetric pre-swirl stator for container ship. Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors Smp’15, 2015305-310

[24]

SongBW, WangYJ, TianWL. Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 103: 55-63

[25]

StreckwallH, Xing-KaedingY. On the working principle of pre-swirl stators and on their application benefit and design targets. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2017, 63(3–4): 87-107

[26]

TanWZ, YanXP, LiuZL. Technology development and prospect of shaft-lessrim driven propulsion system. Journal of Wuhan University Technology, 2015, 39: 601-605

[27]

VanSH, KimMC, LeeJT. Some remarks on the powering performance prediction method for a ship equipped with a preswirl stator–propeller f system. Proceedings of the ITTC, 19932

[28]

VărăticeanuBD, MinciunescuP, NicolescuC, MateiSS, NeacşuMG. Design and validation of a 2.5-kW electric naval propulsion system with rim driven propeller. 2017 Electric Vehicles International Conference (EV), 2017PiscatawayIEEE1-5

[29]

VladimirN, BakicaA, MalenicaS, ImH, SenjanovicI, ChoDS. Numerical method for the vibration analysis of pre-swirl stator. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2021, 16(sup1): 256-265

[30]

VoermasAAM. Development of the Wärtsilä EnergoFlow: An innovative energy saving device. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors smp’17: Launceston, 201712-15

[31]

WitteM, HiekeM, WurmF-H. Identification of coherent flow structures and experimental analysis of the hydroacoustic emission of a hubless propeller. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 188: 106248

[32]

YangS, HuP, JinS, WeiY, LanR, ZhuangS, ZhuH, ChengA, ChenJ, WangD, LiuD. Design of novel shaftless pump-jet propulsor for multi-purpose long range and high speed autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52: 1-4

[33]

YakovlevA, SokolovMA, MarinichNV. Numerical design and experimental verification of a rim-driven thruster. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, 2011396-403

[34]

ZhangYY, LaiMY, NiYG, LiangF. CFD study of hull wakes in oblique flow at model and full scales. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 112(1): 355-367

[35]

ZhangAM, LiuSM, CuiP, LiS, LiuYL. A unified theory for bubble dynamics. Physics of Fluids. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35: 033323

PDF

130

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/