Numerical Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Performance Impact of Novel Appendage on Rim-driven Thruster

Abstract

Addressing the ongoing challenge of enhancing propulsion efficiency in rim-driven thrusters (RDTs), a novel energy-saving appendage was designed to mitigate energy dissipation and improve efficiency. Computational fluid dynamics was utilized to examine the disparities in open-water performance between RDTs with and without this appendage. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations were solved using the Moving Reference Frame approach within the established STAR-CCM+ software. The accuracy of these methodologies was confirmed through a comparison of numerical simulations with experimental data. A meticulous analysis evaluated the alterations in propulsion efficiency of RDTs pre- and post-appendage integration across various advance coefficients. Additionally, a comprehensive assessment of thrust and torque coefficient distributions facilitated a comprehensive understanding of the appendage’s energy-saving potential. Results demonstrated that the new appendage diminishes the diffusive wake behind the rotor disk, fostering a more uniform flow distribution. A notable reduction in the low-pressure zone on the rotor blade’s thrust side was observed, accompanied by an elevation in the high-pressure area. This generated a distinct pressure disparity between the blade’s thrust and suction sides, mitigating the low-pressure region at the blade tip and reducing the likelihood of cavitation. The manuscript further elucidates the rationale behind these alterations, providing detailed insights into flow field dynamics.

Keywords

Rim-driven thruster / Novel appendage / Computational fluid dynamics / Moving reference frame methodology / Propulsion efficiency

References

[1] Bhattacharyya A, Krasilnikov V, Steen S. A CFD-based scaling approach for ducted propellers. Ocean Engineering. 2016, 123: 116-130

[2] Cai M, Yang C, Wu S, Zhu Y, Xie Y. Hydrodynamic analysis of a rim-driven thruster based on RANS method. OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington. 2015, Piscataway, IEEE: 15

[3] Cao QM, Hong FW, Tang DH, Hu FL, Lu LZ. Prediction of loading distribution and hydrodynamic measurements for propeller blades in a rim driven thruster. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B. 2012, 24: 50-57

[4] Çelik F, Güner M. Energy saving device of stator for marine propellers. Ocean Engineering. 2007, 34(5–6): 850-855

[5] Coache S, Meis Fernandez M. ESD design for a validation bulk carrier. International Shipbuilding Progress. 2017, 63(3–4): 211-226

[6] Dang J, Dong G, Chen H. An exploratory study on the working principles of energy saving devices (ESDs). Symposium on Green Ship Technology (Greenship’2011). 2011

[7] Dubas AJ, Bressloff NW, Sharkh SM. Numerical modelling of rotor-stator interaction in rim driven thrusters. Ocean Engineering. 2015, 106: 281-288

[8] Fang G, Qian Z, Jiang J. Research on sheet cavitation numerical predicted and estimation of tip vortex cavitation inception of ducted propeller with preswirl stator. Ship Sci Technol. 2016, 38: 26-29

[9] Gaggero S. Numerical design of a RIM-driven thruster using a RANS-based optimization approach. Applied Ocean Research. 2020, 94: 101941

[10] Go JS, Yoon HS, Jung JH. Effects of a duct before a propeller on propulsion performance. Ocean Engineering. 2017, 136: 54-66

[11] ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. ITTC–recommended procedures and guidelines. International Towing Tank Conference 26th ITTC specialist committee on CFD in marine hydrodynamics. 2011118

[12] Kim JH, Choi JE, Choi BJ, Chung SH, Seo HW. Development of energy-saving devices for a full slow-speed ship through improving propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 2015, 7(2): 390-398

[13] Kinnas S, Chang S-H, He L, Johannessen JT. Performance prediction of a cavitating rim driven tunnel thruster. First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. Norway. 2009, 28(1): 72-82

[14] Koushan K, Krasilnikov V, Nataletti M, Sileo L, Spence S. Experimental and numerical study of pre-swirl stators PSS. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020, 8(1): 47

[15] Lee JT, Kim MC, Suh JC, Kim SH, Choi JK. Development of a preswirl Statorpropeller system for improvement of propulsion efficiency: A symmetric stator propulsion system. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 1992, 29(4): 132-145

[16] Liu B, Yan X, Ouyang W, Lan J, Liang X. Research on regular pattern of gap flow in shaftless rim-driven thruster. 2017 4th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS). 2017134138 2017

[17] Mewis F, Peters H. Power savings through a novel fin system. SMSSH Conference. 19869

[18] Mewis F. A novel power-saving device for full-form vessels. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP’09). 2009

[19] Mewis F. Development of a novel power-saving device for full-form vessels. 200811International Maritime Journal

[20] Nadery A, Ghassemi H. Hydrodynamic performance of the ship propeller under oscillating flow with and without stator. Am J Civ Eng Architect.. 2020, 8(2): 56-61

[21] Nowruzi H, Najafi A. An experimental and CFD study on the effects of different pre-swirl ducts on propulsion performance of series 60 ship. Ocean Engineering. 2019, 173: 491-509

[22] Peng Y, Wang Y, Liu C, Yi W. Comparative analysis of the hydrodynamic performance of front-stator and rear-stator pumpjets. Journal of Harbin Engineering University. 2019, 40(1): 132-140

[23] Shin YJ, Kim MC, Lee WJ, Lee KW, Lee JH. Numerical and experimental investigation of performance of the asymmetric pre-swirl stator for container ship. Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors Smp’15. 2015305310

[24] Song BW, Wang YJ, Tian WL. Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method. Ocean Engineering. 2015, 103: 55-63

[25] Streckwall H, Xing-Kaeding Y. On the working principle of pre-swirl stators and on their application benefit and design targets. International Shipbuilding Progress. 2017, 63(3–4): 87-107

[26] Tan WZ, Yan XP, Liu ZL. Technology development and prospect of shaft-lessrim driven propulsion system. Journal of Wuhan University Technology. 2015, 39: 601-605

[27] Van SH, Kim MC, Lee JT. Some remarks on the powering performance prediction method for a ship equipped with a preswirl stator–propeller f system. Proceedings of the ITTC. 19932

[28] Vărăticeanu BD, Minciunescu P, Nicolescu C, Matei SS, Neacşu MG. Design and validation of a 2.5-kW electric naval propulsion system with rim driven propeller. 2017 Electric Vehicles International Conference (EV). 2017, Piscataway, IEEE: 15

[29] Vladimir N, Bakica A, Malenica S, Im H, Senjanovic I, Cho DS. Numerical method for the vibration analysis of pre-swirl stator. Ships and Offshore Structures. 2021, 16(sup1): 256-265

[30] Voermas AAM. Development of the Wärtsilä EnergoFlow: An innovative energy saving device. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors smp’17: Launceston. 20171215

[31] Witte M, Hieke M, Wurm F-H. Identification of coherent flow structures and experimental analysis of the hydroacoustic emission of a hubless propeller. Ocean Engineering. 2019, 188: 106248

[32] Yang S, Hu P, Jin S, Wei Y, Lan R, Zhuang S, Zhu H, Cheng A, Chen J, Wang D, Liu D. Design of novel shaftless pump-jet propulsor for multi-purpose long range and high speed autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2016, 52: 1-4

[33] Yakovlev A, Sokolov MA, Marinich NV. Numerical design and experimental verification of a rim-driven thruster. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors. 2011396403

[34] Zhang YY, Lai MY, Ni YG, Liang F. CFD study of hull wakes in oblique flow at model and full scales. Applied Ocean Research. 2021, 112(1): 355-367

[35] Zhang AM, Liu SM, Cui P, Li S, Liu YL. A unified theory for bubble dynamics. Physics of Fluids. Physics of Fluids. 2023, 35: 033323

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature