Robust Path Following Control of AUVs Using Adaptive Super Twisting SOSMC

Raghavendra M. Shet , Girish V. Lakhekar , Nalini C. Iyer , Laxman M. Waghmare

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› : 1 -13.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› : 1 -13. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-024-00471-w
Research Article

Robust Path Following Control of AUVs Using Adaptive Super Twisting SOSMC

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The path-following control design for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) requires prior full or partial knowledge about the mathematical model defined through Newton’s second law based on a geometrical investigation. AUV dynamics are highly nonlinear and time-varying, facing unpredictable disturbances due to AUVs operating in deep, hazardous oceanic environments. Consequently, navigation guidance and control systems for AUVs must learn and adapt to the time-varying dynamics of the nonlinear fully coupled vehicle model in the presence of highly unstructured underwater operating conditions. Many control engineers focus on the application of robust model-free adaptive control techniques in AUV maneuvers. Hence, the main goal is to design a novel salp swarm optimization of super twisting algorithm-based secondorder sliding mode controller for the planar path-following control of an AUV through regulation of the heading angle parameter. The finite time for tracking error convergence in the horizontal plane is provided through the control structure architecture, particularly for lateral deviations from the desired path. The proposed control law is designed such that it steers a robotic vehicle to track a predefined planar path at a constant speed determined by an end-user, without any temporal specification. Finally, the efficacy and tracking accuracy are evaluated through comparative analysis based on simulation and experimental hardware-in-loop assessment without violating the input constraints. Moreover, the proposed control law can handle parametric uncertainties and unpredictable disturbances such as ocean currents, wind, and measurement noise.

Keywords

Autonomous underwater vehicle / Super twisting second-order sliding mode control / Salp Swarm optimization / Planar path following control and hardware-in-loop

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Raghavendra M. Shet, Girish V. Lakhekar, Nalini C. Iyer, Laxman M. Waghmare. Robust Path Following Control of AUVs Using Adaptive Super Twisting SOSMC. Journal of Marine Science and Application 1-13 DOI:10.1007/s11804-024-00471-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Amer AF, Sallam EA, Elawady WM. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control using supervisory fuzzy control for 3 DOF planar robot manipulators. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(8): 4943-4953

[2]

Antonelli G, Chiaverini S, Sarkar N, West M. Adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle: experimental results on ODIN. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2001, 9(5): 756-765

[3]

Chalanga A, Kamal S, Fridman LM, Bandyopadhyay B, Moreno JA. Implementation of super-twisting control: Super-twisting and higher order sliding-mode observer-based approaches. IEEE Trans Industr Electron, 2016, 63(6): 3677-3685

[4]

Cheng Z, Wang J. A new combined model based on multiobjective salp swarm optimization for wind speed forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 2020, 92(3): 106-120

[5]

DeBitetto PA. Fuzzy logic for depth control of unmanned undersea vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1995, 20(3): 242-248

[6]

Elmokadem T, Zribi M, Youcef-Toumi K. Trajectory tracking sliding mode control of underactuated AUVs. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2016, 84(2): 1079-1091

[7]

Feng Z, Allen R. Reduced order H∞ control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 13(4): 1511-1520

[8]

Fossen TI. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, 1994, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 448-451

[9]

Geranmehr B, Nekoo SR. Nonlinear suboptimal control of fully coupled non-affine six-DOF autonomous underwater vehicle using the state-dependent Riccati equation. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 96(1): 248-257

[10]

Goheen KR, Jefferys ER. Multivariable self-turning autopilots for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1990, 15(3): 144-151

[11]

Guo J, Chiu FC, Huang CC. Design of a sliding mode fuzzy controller for guidance and control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(16): 2137-2155

[12]

Halil A, Sumer LG. Robust control of variable speed autonomous underwater vehicle, Advanced Robotics, Taylor & Francis, 2014, 601-611

[13]

Innocenti M, Campa G. Robust control of underwater vehicles: sliding mode Vs LMI synthesis. Proceeding of the 1999 American Control Conference, 1999, 5(1): 3422-3426

[14]

Jalving B. The NDRE-AUV flight control system. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1994, 19(4): 497-501

[15]

Jin L, Yang L. Adaptive PI-based sliding mode control for nanopositioning of piezoelectric actuators. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014

[16]

Kim MM, Joe H, Kim J, Yu SC. Integral sliding mode controller for precise manoeuvring of autonomous underwater vehicle in the presence of unknown environmental disturbances. International Journal of Control, 2015, 26(2): 1-11

[17]

Kumar S, Soni SK, Sachan A, Kamal S, Bandyopadhyay B. Adaptive super-twisting guidance law: An event-triggered approach. 2022 16th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2022, 190-195

[18]

Lakhekar GV, Roy RG. Heading control of an underwater vehicle using dynamic fuzzy sliding mode controller. 2014 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies [ICCPCT-2014], 2014, 2014: 1448-1454

[19]

Lakhekar G V, Saundarmal VD. Robust self tuning of fuzzy sliding mode control. International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Tiruchengode, India, 2013, 1-7

[20]

Lakhekar GV, Waghmare LM. Robust self-organising fuzzy sliding mode-based path-following control for autonomous underwater vehicles. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 2023, 22(3): 131-152

[21]

Lakhekar GV, Waghmare LM. Dynamic fuzzy sliding mode control of underwater vehicles. Springer Book Publication Book Chapter: Advances and Applications in Sliding Mode Control systems (Studies in Computational Intelligence) 576 XIV, 2014, 628

[22]

Lakhekar GV, Waghmare LM, Roy RG. Disturbance observerbased fuzzy adapted S-surface controller for spatial trajectory tracking of autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2019, 4(4): 622-636

[23]

Lakhekar GV, Waghmare LM, Jadhav PG, Roy RG. Robust diving motion control of an autonomous underwater vehicle using adaptive neuro-fuzzy sliding mode technique. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 109891-109904

[24]

Lakhekar GV, Waghmare LM. Adaptive fuzzy exponential terminal sliding mode controller design for nonlinear trajectory tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicle. Int. J. Dynam. Control, 2018, 6: 1690-1705

[25]

Lapierre L, Soetanto D. Nonlinear path-following control of an AUV. Ocean Engineering, 2007, 634(11): 1734-1744

[26]

Meysar Z, Notash L. Adaptive sliding mode control with uncertainty estimator for robot manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2010, 45(1): 80-90.

[27]

Moura A, Rijo R, Silva P, Crespo S. A multi-objective genetic algorithm applied to autonomous underwater vehicles for sewage outfall plume dispersion observations. Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10(4): 1119-1126

[28]

Naeem W, Sutton R, Ahmad SM. LQG/ LTR control of an autonomous underwater vehicle using a hybrid guidance law. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 36(4): 31-36

[29]

Naik MS, Singh SN. State-dependent Riccati equation-based robust dive plane control of AUV with control constraints. Ocean Engineering, 2007, 34(11): 1711-1723

[30]

Nakamura Y, Savant S. Nonlinear tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1992, 3: A4-A9

[31]

Pisano A, Usai E. Output-feedback control of an underwater vehicle prototype by higher-order sliding modes. Automatica, 2004, 40(9): 1525-1531

[32]

Rout R, Subudhi B. A backstepping approach for the formation control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles using a leaderfollower strategy. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 2016, 15(1): 38-46

[33]

Sadala SP, Patre BM. Super-twisting control using higher order disturbance observer for control of SISO and MIMO coupled systems. ISA Transactions, 2020, 106: 303-317

[34]

Sahu BK, Subudhi B. Adaptive tracking control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2014, 11(3): 299-307

[35]

Shet RM, Lakhekar GV, Iyer NC. Design of quasi fuzzy sliding mode based maneuvering of autonomous vehicle. Int. J. Dynam. Control., 2023

[36]

Silvestre C, Pascoal A, Kaminer I. On the design of gain scheduled trajectory tracking controllers. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2002, 12: 797-839

[37]

Wang N, Er MJ. Direct Adaptive Fuzzy Tracking Control of Marine Vehicles With Fully Unknown Parametric Dynamics and Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2016, 24(5): 1845-1852

[38]

Wang N, He H, Hou Y, Han B. Model-free visual servo swarming of manned-unmanned surface vehicles with visibility maintenance and collision avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 25(1): 697-709

[39]

Wang N, Liu Y, Liu J, Jia W, Zhang C. Reinforcement learning swarm of self-organizing unmanned surface vehicles with unavailable dynamics. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 289(2): 116313

[40]

Yoerger D, Slotine J. Robust trajectory control of underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1985, 10(4): 462-470

[41]

Yuh J . A neural net controller for underwater robotic vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1990, 15(3): 161-166

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

184

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/