Overview of Research Progress on Numerical Simulation Methods for Turbulent Flows Around Underwater Vehicles

Abstract

In this paper, we present an overview of numerical simulation methods for the flow around typical underwater vehicles at high Reynolds numbers, which highlights the dominant flow structures in different regions of interest. This overview covers the forebody, midbody, stern, wake region, and appendages and summarizes flow phenomena, including laminar-to-turbulent transition, turbulent boundary layers, flow under the influence of curvatures, wake interactions, and all associated complex vortex structures. Furthermore, the current issues and challenges of capturing these flow structures are addressed. This overview provides a deep insight into the use of numerical simulation methods, including the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) method, large eddy simulation (LES) method, and the hybrid RANS/LES method, and evaluates their applicability in capturing detailed flow features.

Keywords

Numerical simulation methods / Underwater vehicles / Boundary layer transition / Turbulent boundary layer / Wake / Appendages

References

[1] Adrian RJ. Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys Fluids, 2007, 19(4): 041301

[2] Alin N, Bensow RE, Fureby C, Huuva T, Svennberg U. Current capabilities of DES and LES for submarines at straight course. J Ship Res, 2010, 54(3): 184-196

[3] Balantrapu NA. The space-time structure of an axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer ingested by a rotor, 2020, Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

[4] Balantrapu NA, Alexander WN, Devenport W. Wall-pressure fluctuations in an axisymmetric boundary layer under strong adverse pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech, 2023, 960: A28

[5] Balantrapu NA, Hickling C, Alexander WN, Devenport W. The structure of a highly decelerated axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech, 2021, 929: A9

[6] Baldwin B, Lomax H (1978) Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulentflows. 16th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Huntsvill

[7] Bhushan S, Alam MF, Walters DK. Evaluation of hybrid RANS/LES models for prediction of flow around surface combatant and Suboff geometries. Comput Fluids, 2013, 88: 834-849

[8] Boger D, Dreyer J. Prediction of hydrodynamic forces and moments for underwater vehicles using overset grids, 2006, Reno: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1-15

[9] Borodulin VI, Gaponenko VR, Kachanov YS, Meyer DGW, Rist U, Lian QX, Lee CB. Late-stage transitional boundary-layer structures. direct numerical simulation and experiment. Theoret Comput Fluid Dynamics, 2002, 15: 317-337

[10] Cao L, Zhu J, Zeng G. Viscous-flow calculations of submarine maneuvering hydrodynamic coefficients and flow field based on same grid topology. J Appl Fluid Mech, 2016, 9(2): 817-826

[11] Chapman DR. Computational aerodynamics development and outlook. AIAA J, 1979, 17(12): 1293-1313

[12] Chen J, Li YJ, Liu ZQ, Yang W, Yao ZF (2017) Improvement of the Gamma Theta transition model in high Reynolds number hydrofoil flow simulations. Proceedings of the 14th National Symposium on Hydrodynamics and the 28th National Symposium on Hydrodynamics (Volume I), 246–251

[13] Chen L. Studies of vortical structures and transition mechanisms in transitional boundary layers, 2010, Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

[14] Chen S, Yang L, Zhao W, Wan D. Wall-modeled large eddy simulation for the flows around an axisymmetric body of revolution. J Hydrodyn, 2023, 35(2): 199-209

[15] Chernyshenko SI, Baig MF. The mechanism of streak formation in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech, 2005, 544(1): 99-131

[16] Cho JR, Chung MK. A k-ε-γ equation turbulence model. J Fluid Mech, 1992, 237: 301-322

[17] Choi H, Moin P. Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited. Phys Fluids, 2012, 24(1): 011702

[18] Coles D. The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech, 1956, 1(2): 191-226

[19] Craik AD. Non-linear resonant instability in boundary layers. J Fluid Mech, 1971, 50(2): 393-413

[20] Dhawan S, Narasimha R. Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion. J Fluid Mech, 1958, 3(4): 418-436

[21] Duan L, Choudhari M, Li F. DNS of laminar-turbulent transition in swept-wing boundary layers. Proceedings of the Summer Program, 2014, 2014: 273-283

[22] Emmons HW. The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer-Part I. J Aeronaut Sci, 1951, 18(7): 490-498

[23] Fischer J-S, Soemarwoto BI, Van Der Weide ETA. Automatic transition prediction in a Navier-Stokes solver using linear stability theory. AIAA J, 2021, 59(7): 2409-2426

[24] Fureby C, Anderson B, Clarke D, Erm L, Henbest S, Giacobello M, Jones D, Nguyen M, Johansson M, Jones M, Kumar C, Lee S-K, Manovski P, Norrison D, Petterson K, Seil G, Woodyatt B, Zhu S. Experimental and numerical study of a generic conventional submarine at 10° yaw. Ocean Eng, 2016, 116: 1-20

[25] Gao S, Shi Y, Pan G, Quan X. A study on the performance of the cavitating flow structure and load characteristics of the vehicle launched underwater. Phys Fluids, 2022, 34(12): 125108

[26] Gao T, Wang Y, Pang Y, Chen Q, Tang Y. A time-efficient CFD approach for hydrodynamic coefficient determination and model simplification of submarine. Ocean Eng, 2018, 154: 16-26

[27] Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot WH. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids Fluid Dyn, 1991, 3(7): 1760-1765

[28] Groves NC, Huang TT, Chang MS. Geometric characteristics of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) SUBOFF models (DTRC model numbers 5470 and 5471), 1989, Bethesda, United States: David Taylor Research Center

[29] Guo H, Peng Y, Li Z. Structures of flow showing adverse pressure gradient transition boundary layer. Exp Fluid Mech, 2008, 22(2): 68-73

[30] He C, Liu Y. A dynamic detached-eddy simulation model for turbulent heat transfer: Impinging jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 2018, 127: 326-338

[31] He C, Liu Y, Yavuzkurt S. A dynamic delayed detached-eddy simulation model for turbulent flows. Comput Fluids, 2017, 146: 174-189

[32] He X, Huang Q, Sun G, Wang X. Numerical research of the pressure fluctuation of the bow of the submarine at different velocities. J Mar Sci Eng, 2022, 10(9): 1188

[33] Huang T, Liu H, Groves N, Forlini T, Blanton J, Gowing S (1992) Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages in a wind tunnel: the darpa suboff experimental program. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, 321–346

[34] Hunt J, Wray A, Moin P (1988) Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, 193–208

[35] Hutchins N, Marusic I. Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci, 2007, 365(1852): 647-664

[36] ISraeli Computational Fluid Dynamics Center (2014) Turbulent flow over a 6:1 prolate spheroid at high incidence. Available from https://www.iscfdc.co.il/?q=front-page-prolate-spheroid-sl. [Accessed on Jan. 16, 2024]

[37] Jeong J, Hussain F. On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech., 1995, 285: 69-94

[38] Jiménez JM, Hultmark M, Smits AJ. The intermediate wake of a body of revolution at high Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 659: 516-539

[39] Jiménez JM, Reynolds RT, Smits AJ. The effects of fins on the intermediate wake of a submarine model. J Fluids Eng, 2010, 132(3): 031102

[40] Jones W, Launder BE. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 1972, 15(2): 301-314

[41] Kachanov YS. Physical mechanisms of laminar-boundary-layer transition. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1994, 26(1): 411-482

[42] Kachanov YS, Kozlov VV, Levchenko VY. Experimental study of boundary layer stability on a wavy surface. Bulletin of the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1974, 3: 3-6

[43] Kim M, Lim J, Kim S, Jee S, Park J, Park D. Large-eddy simulation with parabolized stability equations for turbulent transition using OpenFOAM. Comput Fluids, 2019, 189: 108-117

[44] Kim WW, Menon S, Kim WW, Menon S (1997) Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall-bounded flows. 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, AIAA Paper 97-0210

[45] Kitsios V, Sekimoto A, Atkinson C, Sillero JA, Borrell G, Gungor AG, Jiménez J, Soria J. Direct numerical simulation of a self-similar adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer at the verge of separation. J Fluid Mech, 2017, 829: 392-419

[46] Kline SJ, Reynolds WC, Schraub FA, Runstadler PW. The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech, 1967, 30(4): 741-773

[47] Krogstad P, Skåre PE. Influence of a strong adverse pressure gradient on the turbulent structure in a boundary layer. Phys Fluids, 1995, 7(8): 2014-2024

[48] Kumar P, Mahesh K. Large-eddy simulation of flow over an axisymmetric body of revolution. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 853: 537-563

[49] Kumar P, Mahesh K. Analysis of axisymmetric boundary layers. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 849: 927-941

[50] Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods. Appl Mech Eng., 1974, 3(2): 269-289

[51] Lee C, Li R. Dominant structure for turbulent production in a transitional boundary layer. J Turbul, 2007, 8: N55

[52] Li H (2020) Research on the γ - Re _θ engineering transition prediction model. Proceedings of the 9th China Aeronautical Society Youth Science and Technology Forum, 655–667 (in Chinese)

[53] Li X, Fu D, Ma Y. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary layer transition over a blunt cone with a small angle of attack. Phys Fluids, 2010, 22(2): 025105

[54] Lily D. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids Fluid Dyn, 1992, 4(3): 633-635

[55] Liu C, Gao Y, Dong X, Wang Y, Liu J, Zhang Y, Cai X, Gui N. Third generation of vortex identification methods: Omega and Liutex/Rortex based systems. J Hydrodyn, 2019, 31(2): 205-223

[56] Liu C, Gao Y, Tian S. Rortex—A new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions. Phys Fluids, 2018, 30: 035103

[57] Liu J, Chu X, Zhang Y. Numerical investigation of natural transitions of bow boundary layers over underwater axisymmetric bodies. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(7): 074101

[58] Liu J, Gao Y, Liu C. An objective version of the Rortex vector for vortex identification. Phys Fluids, 2019, 3: 065112

[59] Liu Y, Wang H, Wang S, He G. A cache-efficient reordering method for unstructured meshes with applications to wall-resolved large-eddy simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 480: 112009

[60] Liu Y, Zhou Z, Zhu L, Wang S. Numerical investigation of flows around an axisymmetric body of revolution by using Reynolds-stress model based hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/large eddy simulation. Phys Fluids, 2021, 33: 085115

[61] Lueptow RM. Turbulent boundary layer on a cylinder in axial flow. AIAA J, 1990, 28(10): 1705-1706

[62] Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605

[63] Menter FR, Langtry R, Völker S. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow Turbul Combust, 2006, 77(1–4): 277-303

[64] Merz S, Kinns R, Kessissoglou N. Structural and acoustic responses of a submarine hull due to propeller forces. J. Sound Vib., 2009, 325(1–2): 266-286

[65] Monty JP, Stewart JA, Williams RC, Chong MS. Large-scale features in turbulent pipe and channel flows. J Fluid Mech, 2007, 589: 147-156

[66] Morkovin MV. Critical evaluation of transition from laminar to turbulent shear layers with emphasis on hypersonically traveling bodies, 1969, Ohio, Unitied States: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force

[67] Morse N, Mahesh K. Large-eddy simulation and streamline coordinate analysis of flow over an axisymmetric hull. J Fluid Mech, 2021, 926: A18

[68] Nicoud F, Ducros F. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow Turbul Combust, 1999, 62(3): 183-200

[69] Nie H, Song W, Han Z, Chen J, Duan M, Wan B. Transition prediction method for laminar wings of supersonic civil aircraft design. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(11): 171-189

[70] Niu M, Wen H, Han Y, Su C, Meng X. Stability analysis and transition prediction of the short-nacelle boundary layer. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 117-128

[71] Norrison D, Petterson K, Sidebottom W (2017) Numerical study of propeller diameter effects for a self-propelled conventional submarine. Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Espoo, Finland, 848–855

[72] Patel P, Zha G (2020) Improved delayed detached eddy simulation of separated flow. AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3013

[73] Patel VC, Nakayama A, Damian R. Measurements in the thick axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer near the tail of a body of revolution. J Fluid Mech, 1974, 63(2): 345-367

[74] Piomelli U. Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2008, 44(6): 437-446

[75] Piquet J, Patel VC. Transverse curvature e! ects in turbulent boundary layer. Prog Aerosp Sci, 1999, 35(7): 661-672

[76] Pope SB. Turbulent flows, 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[77] Posa A, Balaras E. A numerical investigation of the wake of an axisymmetric body with appendages. J Fluid Mech, 2016, 792: 470-498

[78] Posa A, Balaras E. A numerical investigation about the effects of Reynolds number on the flow around an appended axisymmetric body of revolution. J Fluid Mech, 2020, 884: A41

[79] Qu Y, Wu Q, Zhao X, Huang B, Fu X, Wang G. Numerical investigation of flow structures around the DARPA SUBOFF model. Ocean Eng, 2021, 239: 109866

[80] Robinson D, Hassan H (1996) A two-equation turbulence closure model for wall bounded and free shear flows. Fluid Dynamics Conference, New Orleans, 1–11

[81] Rocca A, Cianferra M, Broglia R, Armenio V. Computational hydroacoustic analysis of the BB2 submarine using the advective Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings equation with Wall-Modeled LES. Appl Ocean Res, 2022, 129: 103360

[82] Saffman PG, Wilcox DC. Turbulence-model predictions for turbulent boundary layers. AIAA Journal, 1974, 12(4): 541-546

[83] Sayadi T, Moin P. Large eddy simulation of controlled transition to turbulence. Phys Fluids, 2012, 24(11): 114103

[84] Schatzman DM, Thomas FO. An experimental investigation of an unsteady adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer: embedded shear layer scaling. J Fluid Mech, 2017, 815: 592-642

[85] Shi Y, Lu J, Gao S, Pan G, Ren J. Experimental study on the cavitation flow and motion characteristics of the vehicle launched underwater. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., 2023, 15: 100492

[86] Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets M, Travin AK. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2008, 29(6): 1638-1649

[87] Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev, 1963, 91(3): 99-164

[88] Smith TA, Ventikos Y (2019) Assessment of computational techniques for the prediction of acoustic sources from lifting surfaces using LES and DNS. MARINE 2019. Computational Methods in Marine Engineering VIII, Gothenburg, Sweden, 393–404

[89] Smits AJ, McKeon BJ, Marusic I. High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2011, 43(1): 353-375

[90] Spalart P, Jou W, Strelets M, Allmaras S. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. Advances in DNS/LES, 1997, 1: 4-8

[91] Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MK, Travin A. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn, 2006, 20(3): 181-195

[92] Stuart JT. On the non-linear mechanics of hydrodynamic stability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 4(1): 1-21

[93] Suzen YB, Huang PG. Modeling of flow transition using an intermittency transport equation. J Fluids Eng, 2000, 122(2): 273-284

[94] Suzen YB, Huang PG (2001) Predictions of separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions using an intermittency transport equation. 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, 1–21

[95] Tang W, Yu M, Wang B (2019) Hydrodynamic noise theory. Science Press, Beijing

[96] Theodorsen T (1952) Mechanism of turbulence. Proceedings of the 2nd Midwestern Conference on Fluid Mechanics, 1–19

[97] Townsend AA. The structure of turbulent shear flow, 1956, London: Cambridges University Press

[98] Toxopeus S. Viscous-flow calculations for bare hull DARPA SUBOFF submarine at incidence. Int Shipbuild Prog, 2008, 55: 227-251

[99] Van Driest ER. On turbulent flow near a wall. J Aeronaut Sci, 1956, 23(11): 1007-1011

[100] Van Driest ER, Blumer CB. Boundary layer transition-freestream turbulence and pressure gradient effects. AIAA J, 1963, 1(6): 1303-1306

[101] Van Ingen JL. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary layer transition region, 1956, Delft: Technical University of Delft, VTH-74

[102] Wang J, Guan F, Luo T (2018) Direct numerical simulation of boundary layer transition on a flat plate. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Beijing Mechanics Society, 867–868. (in Chinese)

[103] Wang L, Pan C, Wang J, Gao Q. Statistical signatures of component wall-attached eddies in proper orthogonal decomposition modes of a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech, 2022, 944: A26

[104] Wang S, Shi B, Li Y, He G. A large eddy simulation of flows around an underwater vehicle model using an immersed boundary method. Theor Appl Mech Lett, 2016, 6(6): 302-305

[105] Wang Y, Al-Dujaly H, Yan Y, Zhao N, Liu C. Physics of multiple level hairpin vortex structures in turbulence. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2016, 59(2): 624703

[106] Wei T, Maciel Y, Klewicki J. Integral analysis of boundary layer flows with pressure gradient. Phys Rev Fluids, 2017, 2(9): 092601

[107] Wu Q, Huang B, Wang G, Cao S, Zhu M. Numerical modelling of unsteady cavitation and induced noise around a marine propeller. Ocean Eng, 2018, 160: 143-155

[108] Wu X, Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J Fluid Mech, 2009, 630: 5-41

[109] Xiang X, Zhang Y, Yuan X, Tu G, Wan B, Chen J. C - γ - Re _θ high-speed three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction model. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2021, 42(9): 196-204

[110] Yang C, Lohner R (2003) Prediction of flows over an axisymmetric body with appendages. The 8th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Busan, 1–15

[111] Yapar O, Basu PK. Fluid-structure interaction simulation of the effects of underwater explosion on submerged structures. Finite Elem Anal Des., 2022, 199: 103678

[112] Ye C, Wang F, Tang Y, Chen J, Zheng Y. Modification of the SST γ - Re _(θt) transition model based on the environmental source term method. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2023, 54(2): 1-15

[113] Yoshizawa A, Horiuti K. A statistically-derived subgrid-scale kinetic energy model for the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J Phys Soc Jpn, 1985, 54(8): 2834-2839

[114] Zhang AM, Li SM, Cui P, Li S, Liu YL. A unified theory for bubble dynamics. Phys Fluids, 2023, 35(3): 033323

[115] Zhang X, Wang C, Wekesa DW. Numerical and experimental study of pressure-wave formation around an underwater ventilated vehicle. Eur J Mech B Fluids, 2017, 65: 440-449

[116] Zhao W, Pan Z, Yu L, Wan D. An overview of flow field computational methods for hydrodynamic noise prediction. J Hydrodyn, 2022, 34(6): 994-1005

[117] Zhao X, Deng X, Mao M, Yang W, Zhao H. Large eddy simulation of forced transition flow in hypersonic inlets. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(8): 2445-2453

[118] Zhou D, Wang K, Wang M (2020) Large-eddy simulation of an axisymmetric boundary layer on a body of revolution. AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2989

[119] Zhou H, Li X, Qi H, Yu C. Subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of transition and turbulence in compressible flows. Phys Fluids, 2019, 31(12): 125118

[120] Zhou Z, Xu Z, Wang S, He G. Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of noise generated by turbulence around an appended axisymmetric body of revolution. J Hydrodyn, 2022, 34(4): 533-554