Fuel Consumption Analysis of Single and Twin-Screw Propulsion Systems of a Bulk Carrier

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis between single and twin-screw propulsion systems of a bulk carrier to evaluate the ship and propeller performance in terms of fuel consumption as well as to discuss the cavitation and noise criteria. An optimization model is developed to select the optimum propeller geometry and operational point along the engine load diagram for the selected engines of each case. The engines are selected from the same series due to the same behaviour along the engine load diagram. The propellers are selected from the B-series as fixed-pitch propellers. It has been concluded that while the components of the single-screw propulsion system are larger than the twin-screw, the single-screw propulsion system shows a reduction in fuel consumption than the twin screw by around 19%, thus affecting the amount of exhaust emissions from the ship. This model helps the ship designers to select a suitable propeller to improve the energy efficiency of the ships.

Keywords

Propeller performance / Exhaust emissions / Energy efficiency / IMO / Decarbonization / Fuel consumption / Single and twin-screw

References

[1] Altosole M, Benvenuto G, Campora U, Laviola M, Zaccone R. Simulation and performance comparison between diesel and natural gas engines for marine applications. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2017, 231(2): 690-704

[2] Arapakopoulos A, Polichshuk R, Segizbayev Z, Ospanov S, Ginnis AI, Kostas KV. Parametric models for marine propellers. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 192: 106595

[3] Bacciaglia A, Ceruti A, Liverani A. Controllable pitch propeller optimization through meta-heuristic algorithm. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37: 2257-2271

[4] Benvenuto G, Campora U. Influence of the marine engine load diagram characteristics on the ship propulsion system performance. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering and Technology Research, 2022, 3(2): 59-67

[5] Benvenuto G, Campora U, Altosole M, Balsamo F. Guedes Soares C, Santos TA. Numerical modelling and analysis of the ambient conditions influence on the performance of a marine diesel engine. Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2021, London: Taylor and Francis, 463-474

[6] Blount DL, Fox DL. Design considerations for propellers in a cavitating environment. Marine Technology, 1978, 15: 144-178

[7] Burrill LC, Emerson A. Propeller cavitation: Further tests on 16in propeller models in the King’s College cavitation tunnel. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1963, 10(104): 119-131

[8] Carlton J. Marine propellers and propulsion, 2012, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann

[9] Cherednichenko O, Mitienkova V. Analysis of the impact of thermochemical recuperation of waste heat on the energy efficiency of gas carriers. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2020, 19(1): 72-82

[10] Cherednichenko O, Serbin S. Analysis of efficiency of the ship propulsion system with thermochemical recuperation of waste heat. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2018, 17(1): 122-130

[11] Chiong MC, Kang HS, Shaharuddin NMR, Mat S, Quen LK, Ten KH, Ong MC. Challenges and opportunities of marine propulsion with alternative fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 149: 111397

[12] Dang J, Van den Boom HJJ, Ligtelijn JT (2013) The Wageningen C-and D-series propellers. 12th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST)

[13] Du W, Li Y, Zhang G, Wang C, Zhu B, Qiao J. Energy saving method for ship weather routing optimization. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 258: 111771

[14] El-Gohary MM. Overview of past, present and future marine power plants. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2013, 12(2): 219-227

[15] El-Gohary MM, Welaya YMA, Saad AA. The use of hydrogen as a fuel for inland waterway units. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2014, 13(2): 212-217

[16] El Gohary MM, Ammar NR. Thermodynamic analysis of alternative marine fuels for marine gas turbine power plants. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2016, 15(1): 95-103

[17] Elkafas AG, Elgohary MM, Zeid AE. Numerical study on the hydrodynamic drag force of a container ship model. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2019, 58(3): 849-859

[18] Figari M, Theotokatos G, Coraddu A, Stoumpos S, Mondella T. Parametric investigation and optimal selection of the hybrid turbocharger system for a large marine four-stroke dual-fuel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 208: 117991

[19] Fridell E, Salberg H, Salo K. Measurements of emissions to air from a marine engine fueled by methanol. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2021, 20(1): 138-143

[20] Gaafary MM, El-Kilani HS, Moustafa MM. Optimum design of B-series marine propellers. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2011, 50: 13-18

[21] Hao W. Numerical study of the effect of ship attitude on the perform of ship with air injection in bottom cavity. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 186: 106119

[22] Holtrop J. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1984, 31(363): 272-276

[23] Holtrop J (1988) A statistical resistance prediction method with a speed dependent form factor. Proceedings of Scientific and Methodological Seminar on Ship Hydrodynamics (SMSSH’ 88). Bulgarian Ship Hydrodynamics Centre, Varna, Bulgaria, 1–7

[24] Holtrop J, Mennen GGJ. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1982, 29(335): 166-170

[25] Hong Y, Hao LF, Wang PC, Liu WB, Zhang HM, Wang RG. Structural design and multi-objective evaluation of composite bladed propeller. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 2014, 22(3): 275-282

[26] Huisman J, Foeth E-J, Slot J, Lampe A, Moulijn J, Dang J. Design of the Wageningen F-series, 2021, Wageningen, Netherlands: MARIN

[27] Hwang JL, Tsai JF, Li CY. Cupped propeller test and analysis. Ship Technology Research, 1995, 42(4): 186-192

[28] HydroComp (2018) NavCad: Reliable and confident performance prediction. NH, USA: HydroComp Inc. Available from https://www.hydrocompinc.com/solutions/navcad/. [Accessed on 30 January 2019]

[29] Islam H, Guedes Soares C. Effect of trim on container ship resistance at different ship speeds and drafts. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 183: 106-115

[30] Islam H, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C, Tadros M, Abdelwahab HS. Guedes Soares C, Santos TA. Comparison between empirical and CFD based methods for ship resistance and power prediction. Trends in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2022, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 347-357

[31] Jaurola M, Hedin A, Tikkanen S, Huhtala K. A TOpti simulation for finding fuel saving by optimising propulsion control and power management. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2020, 25(2): 411-425

[32] Karatuǧ Ç, Arslanoǧlu Y, Guedes Soares C. Guedes Soares C, Santos TA. Evaluation of decarbonization strategies for existing ships. Trends in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2022, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 45-54

[33] Keller WH. Extended diagrams for determining the resistance and required power for single-screw ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1973, 20: 133-142

[34] Kim K, Tillig F, Bathfield N, Liljenberg H. Hydrodynamic optimization of twin-skeg LNG ships by CFD and model testing. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2014, 6(2): 392-405

[35] Latarche M. Pounder’s marine diesel engines and gas turbines, 2020, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

[36] MacPherson DM (1991) Reliable propeller selection for work boats and pleasure craft: techniques using a personal computer. SNAME Fourth Biennial Power Boat Symposium, New Jersey, USA: SNAME

[37] Mallouppas G, Yfantis EA. Decarbonization in shipping industry: a review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 415

[38] Miller G (2022) Ship fuel enters uncharted territory as prices hit new wartime peak. Available from https://www.freightwaves.com/news/ship-fuel-enters-uncharted-territory-as-prices-hit-new-wartime-peak. [Accessed on 10 September 2022]

[39] Mocerino L, Guedes Soares C, Rizzuto E, Balsamo F, Quaranta F. Validation of an emission model for a marine diesel engine with data from sea operations. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2021, 20(3): 534-545

[40] Moreira L, Vettor R, Guedes S. Neural network approach for predicting ship speed and fuel consumption. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(2): 119

[41] Nahim HM, Younes R, Nohra C, Ouladsine M. Complete modeling for systems of a marine diesel engine. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2015, 14(1): 93-104

[42] Najafi S, Pourmostafa M. Investigating the performance of twin marine propellers in different ship wake fields using an unsteady viscous and inviscid solver. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2022, 21(2): 92-105

[43] Nazemian A, Ghadimi P. Multi-objective optimization of ship hull modification based on resistance and wake field improvement: combination of adjoint solver and CAD-CFD-based approach. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2021, 44(1): 27

[44] Nouri NM, Mohammadi S, Zarezadeh M. Optimization of a marine contra-rotating propellers set. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 167: 397-404

[45] Raeie N, Emami S, Karimi Sadaghiyani O. Effects of injection timing, before and after top dead center on the propulsion and power in a diesel engine. Propulsion and Power Research, 2014, 3(2): 59-67

[46] Seddiek IS, Ammar NR. Harnessing wind energy on merchant ships: case study Flettner rotors onboard bulk carriers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(25): 32695-32707

[47] Stark C, Xu Y, Zhang M, Yuan Z, Tao L, Shi W. Study on applicability of energy-saving devices to hydrogen fuel cell-powered ships. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(3): 388

[48] Stoumpos S, Theotokatos G. Multiobjective optimisation of a marine dual fuel engine equipped with exhaust gas recirculation and air bypass systems. Energies, 2020, 13(19): 5021

[49] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Optimization procedure to minimize fuel consumption of a four-stroke marine turbocharged diesel engine. Energy, 2019, 168: 897-908

[50] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. A nonlinear optimization tool to simulate a marine propulsion system for ship conceptual design. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 210: 107417

[51] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Optimization of the performance of marine diesel engines to minimize the formation of SOx emissions. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2020, 19(3): 473-484

[52] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Design of propeller series optimizing fuel consumption and propeller efficiency. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(11): 1226

[53] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Guedes Soares C, Santos T. A review of the use of Biodiesel as a green fuel for diesel engines. Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2021, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 481-490

[54] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Guedes Soares C, Santos T. Sensitivity analysis of the steam Rankine cycle in marine applications. Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering, 2021, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 491-500

[55] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. An optimisation procedure for propeller selection for different shaft inclinations. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2022, 164(A3): 295-315

[56] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C (2022b) Optimization procedures for a twin controllable pitch propeller of a ROPAX ship at minimum fuel consumption. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2022.2106623

[57] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Towards fuel consumption reduction based on the optimum contra-rotating propeller. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(11): 1657

[58] Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Review of current regulations, available technologies, and future trends in the green shipping industry. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 280: 114670

[59] Tadros M, Vettor R, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Coupled engine-propeller selection procedure to minimize fuel consumption at a specified speed. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(1): 59

[60] Tadros M, Vettor R, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Assessment of ship fuel consumption for different hull roughness in realistic weather conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(12): 1891

[61] Tadros M, Vettor R, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Effect of propeller cup on the reduction of fuel consumption in realistic weather conditions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(8): 1039

[62] Taskar B, Sasmal K, Yiew LJ. A case study for the assessment of fuel savings using speed optimization. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 274: 113990

[63] Trivyza NL, Rentizelas A, Theotokatos G, Boulougouris E. Decision support methods for sustainable ship energy systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energy, 2022, 239: 122288

[64] Van Lammeren WPA, van Manen JD, Oosterveld MWC. The Wageningen B-screw series. Trans. SNAME, 1969, 77: 269-317

[65] Vedachalam S, Baquerizo N, Dalai AK. Review on impacts of low sulfur regulations on marine fuels and compliance options. Fuel, 2022, 310: 122243

[66] Vesting F, Bensow RE. Particle swarm optimization: an alternative in marine propeller optimization? Engineering Optimization, 2018, 50(1): 70-88

[67] Vettor R, Tadros M, Ventura M, Guedes Soares C. Guedes Soares C, Santos TA. Route planning of a fishing vessel in coastal waters with fuel consumption restraint. Maritime Technology and Engineering 3, 2016, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 167-173

[68] Wang P, Tang X, Shi L, Ni X, Hu Z, Deng K. Experimental investigation of the influences of Miller cycle combined with EGR on performance, energy and exergy characteristics of a four-stroke marine regulated two-stage turbocharged diesel engine. Fuel, 2021, 300: 120940

[69] Wartsila (2023) Improving efficiency. Available from https://www.wartsila.com/sustainability/climate-and-environment/innovating-for-sustainability/improving-efficiency. [Accessed on 05 May 2023]

[70] Wei S, Wu C, Yan S, Ding T, Chen J. Miller cycle with early intake valve closing in marine medium-speed diesel engines. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2022, 21(1): 151-160

[71] Wei S, Zhao X, Liu X, Qu X, He C, Leng X. Research on effects of early intake valve closure (EIVC) miller cycle on combustion and emissions of marine diesel engines at medium and low loads. Energy, 2019, 173: 48-58

[72] Williams A. Single- and twin-screw propulsion of tankers and bulk carriers, 1975, Washington, D. C.: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers

[73] Xiang L, Theotokatos G, Ding Y. Parametric investigation on the performance-emissions trade-off and knocking occurrence of dual fuel engines using CFD. Fuel, 2023, 340: 127535

[74] Xiong Y, Wang Z, Qi W. Numerical study on the influence of boss cap fins on efficiency of controllable-pitch propeller. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2013, 12(1): 13-20

[75] Zaccone R, Ottaviani E, Figari M, Altosole M. Ship voyage optimization for safe and energy-efficient navigation: A dynamic programming approach. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 153: 215-224

[76] Zainol I, Yaakob O. Use of diesel engine and surface-piercing propeller to achieve fuel savings for inshore fishing boats. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2016, 15(2): 214-221

[77] Zetterdahl M, Salo K, Fridell E, Sjöblom J. Impact of aromatic concentration in marine fuels on particle emissions. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2017, 16(3): 352-361