Decarbonization of Maritime Transportation: A Case Study for Turkish Ship Fleet

Abstract

Climate change and global warming are among the most severe threats to the global ecosystem, caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, all industries that cause environmental emissions should collaborate in the struggle against climate change. In this context, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) approved the initial greenhouse gas strategy at the MEPC 72 session in April 2018 to achieve targets for 2050. With this strategy, the IMO aims to create and improve new regulations that can enhance energy efficiency to achieve their short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals. In this study, one of the novel terms, energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) values, has been calculated for the Turkish fleet to guide the maritime sector. The Turkish fleet in the study refers to the Turkish-owned vessels both sailing with a national or international flag. In accordance with this regulation, the number of Turkish fleets that were identified as either above or below the IMO reference lines has been determined. Additionally, EEXI values have been recalculated using the engine power limitation (EPL) method for ships that exceed the required limits, and the success rate of this method has been estimated. As a result, the application of EPL increased the number of ships below the Phase 2 reference line from 15.6 % to 53.1 %. To the best of our knowledge, this research, which has been carried out on all Turkish-owned ships, is the first study intended to serve as a guide for other ship owners in the global maritime industry regarding energy efficiency management.

Keywords

Energy efficiency existing ship index / Energy efficiency / Emissions / CO₂ / Engine power limitation / Decarbonization

References

[1] Alpha Marine (2021) Latest MARPOL Annex VI amendments EEXI, CII & SEEMP. https://alphamrn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/67-TECH-febr2021.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2023

[2] Armstrong VN. Vessel optimisation for low carbon shipping. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 73: 195-207

[3] Bagoulla C, Guillotreau P. Maritime transport in the French economy and its impact on air pollution: An input-output analysis. Marine Policy, 2020, 116: 103818

[4] Chamber of Shipping (2022) Maritime Sector Report

[5] Dillman K, Czepkiewicz M, Heinonen J, Fazeli R, Árnadóttir Á, Davíðsdóttir B, Shafiei E. Decarbonization scenarios for Reykjavik’s passenger transport: The combined effects of behavioural changes and technological developments. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 65: 102614

[6] Gray N, McDonagh S, O’Shea R, Smyth B, Murphy J. Decarbonising ships, planes and trucks: An analysis of suitable low-carbon fuels for the maritime, aviation and haulage sectors. Advances in Applied Energy, 2021, 1: 100008

[7] Hansen EK, Rasmussen HB, Lützen M. Making shipping more carbon-friendly? Exploring ship energy efficiency management plans in legislation and practice. Energy Research & Social Science, 2020, 65: 101459

[8] Horvath S, Fasihi M, Breyer C. Techno-economic analysis of a decarbonized shipping sector: Technology suggestions for a fleet in 2030 and 2040. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 164: 230-241

[9] IMO (2020a) Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study-Full report and annexes

[10] IMO (2020b) ISWG-GHG 7/2/6, Draft amendments to marpol annex vi to incorporate the goal based enegy efficiency existing ship index

[11] IMO (2020c) ISWG-GHG 7/2/7, Draft guidelines associated with draft amendments to marpol annex vi

[12] IMO (2020d) IMO Environment Committee approves amendments to cut ship emissions. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/Press

[13] Briefings/pages/42-MEPC-short-term-measure. aspx. Accessed 11 Mar 2022

[14] Işıklı E, Aydın N, Bilgili L, Toprak A. Estimating fuel consumption in maritime transport. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275: 124142

[15] Kanberoǧlu B, Kökkülünk G. Assessment of CO₂ emissions for a bulk carrier fleet. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 283: 124590

[16] Karaduman HA, Karaman-Akgül A, Çaǧlar M, Akbaş HE. The relationship between logistics performance and carbon emissions: an empirical investigation on Balkan countries. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2020, 12: 449-461

[17] Leonardí J, Browne M. A method for assessing the carbon footprint of maritime freight transport: European case study and results. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2010, 13: 349-358

[18] Lindstad H, Eskeland GS. Low carbon maritime transport: How speed, size and slenderness amounts to substantial capital energy substitution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 41: 244-256

[19] Liu J, Duru O, Law A-K. Assessment of atmospheric pollutant emissions with maritime energy strategies using bayesian simulations and time series forecasting. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 270: 116068

[20] MEPC (2011) MEPC. 203(62). Amendments to the Annex of The Protocol of 1997 to Amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.203(62).pdf

[21] MEPC (2021a) Resolution MEPC.333(76), 2021 Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained energy efficiency existing ship index (EEXI)

[22] MEPC (2018a) Resolution MEPC.304(72), Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships

[23] MEPC (2022) MEPC. 350(78), 2022 Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of The Attained Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI)

[24] MEPC (2018b) MEPC.308(73), 2018 Guidelines on The Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships

[25] MEPC (2021b) MEPC. 333(76), 2021 Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of The Attained Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI)

[26] MEPC (2021c) MEPC.328(76), 2021 Revised MARPOL Annex VI

[27] Mohr H, Katsikas S, Ohorn H, Seedorf P, Spörl S, Thalhammer A (2022) The impact on the operational profile of different ship types and solutions for future - proofing existing vessels. METIS Cyberspace Technology report. https://www.metis.tech/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CII-The-impact-on-the-operation-of-different-ship-types.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2023

[28] Müller-Casseres E, Carvalho F, Nogueira T, Fonte C, Império M, Poggio M, Wei H, Portugal-Pereira J, Rochedo P, Szklo A, Schaeffer R. Production of alternative marine fuels in Brazil: An integrated assessment perspective. Energy, 2021, 219: 119444

[29] Nian V, Yuan J. A method for analysis of maritime transportation systems in the life cycle approach–The oil tanker example. Applied Energy, 2017, 206: 1579-1589

[30] Papadis E, Tsatsaronis G. Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, 2020, 205: 118025

[31] Parlak A, Kökkülünk G. Performance Measurement and Evaluation of a Marine Diesel Engine. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 2016, 4: 165-173

[32] Prasad RD, Raturi A. Fuel demand and emissions for maritime sector in Fiji: Current status and low-carbon strategies. Marine Policy, 2019, 102: 40-50

[33] Prussi M, Scarlat N, Acciaro M, Kosmas V. Potential and limiting factors in the use of alternative fuels in the European maritime sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 291: 125849

[34] Rehmatulla N, Smith T. Barriers to energy efficient and low carbon shipping. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 110: 102-112

[35] Rehmatulla N, Smith T. The impact of split incentives on energy efficiency technology investments in maritime transport. Energy Policy, 2020, 147: 111721

[36] Rigos N (2022) The effect of Engine Power Limitation on the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI). National Technical University of Athens School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering

[37] Rutherford D, Mao X, Osipova L, Comer B (2020) Limiting Engine Power to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Existing Ships

[38] Serra P, Fadda P, Fancello G. Investigating the potential mitigating role of network design measures for reducing the environmental impact of maritime Chains: The Mediterranean case. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2020, 8: 263-280

[39] United Nations (2021) Review of Maritime Transport 2021. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2021_en_0.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov. 2022

[40] Vierth I, Merkel A (2020) Internalization of external and infrastructure costs related to maritime transport in Sweden. Research in Transportation Business & Management 100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100580

[41] Wan Z, el Makhloufi A, Chen Y, Tang J. Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 126: 428-435

[42] Wang H, Liang Y, Jeong B, Meshabi A, Zhou P (2019) Configurations optimization of a tug ship propulsion system: a life cycle assessment case study. In: Young Researchers Seminar 2019. GRC, pp 1–17

[43] Wang H, Zhou P. Systematic evaluation approach for carbon reduction method assessment–A life cycle assessment case study on carbon solidification method. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 165: 480-487

[44] Wang Z, Paulauskiene T, Uebe J, Bucas M. Characterization of Biomethanol–Biodiesel–Diesel Blends as Alternative Fuel for Marine Applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8: 730

[45] Yuan J, Nian V, He J, Yan W. Cost-effectiveness analysis of energy efficiency measures for maritime shipping using a metamodel based approach with different data sources. Energy, 2019, 189: 116205

[46] Zhang S, Li Y, Yuan H, Sun D. An alternative benchmarking tool for operational energy efficiency of ships and its policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 240: 118223

[47] Zheng J, Zhang H, Yin L, Liang Y, Wang B, Li Z, Song X, Zhang Y. A voyage with minimal fuel consumption for cruise ships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 215: 144-153

[48] Zhu M, Yuen KF, Ge JW, Li KX. Impact of maritime emissions trading system on fleet deployment and mitigation of CO2 emission. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018, 62: 474-488

[49] Zis TPV, Psaraftis HN, Tillig F, Ringsberg JW. Decarbonizing maritime transport: A Ro-Pax case study. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2020, 37: 100565