Characteristics of Significant Wave Components in the Long Time Wave Evolution Process

Abstract

Spectral bandwidth is a relevant parameter of water wave evolution and is commonly used to represent the number of wave components involved in wave—wave interactions. However, whether these two parameters are equivalent is an open question. Following the high-order spectral method and taking the weakly modulated Stokes wave train as the initial condition, the relationship between the spectral bandwidth and the number of wave components is investigated in this work. The results showed that the number of wave components can vary with the same spectral bandwidth and that distinct wave profiles emerge from different numbers of wave components. With a new definition of significant wave components, the characteristics of this parameter in the long-time wave evolution are discussed, along with its relationship with common parameters, including the wave surface maximum and the wave height. The results reveal that the wave surface evolution trend of different numbers of significant wave components (N _s) is the same from a holistic perspective, while the difference between them also exists, mainly in locations where extreme waves occur. Furthermore, there is a negative correlation between r (a _j/a ₀) and wave surface maximum (η _max/a ₀) and wave height (H _max and H _s). The evolution trends of the relative errors (RE) of η _max/a ₀, H _max, and H _s of different N _s show the periodic recurrence of modulation and demodulation in the early stage when the Benjamin—Feir instability is dominated. The difference is that in the later stage, the RE of η _max/a ₀ and H _max is chaotic and irregular, while those of H _s gradually stabilize near an equilibrium value. Furthermore, we discuss the relationship between the mean relative error (MRE) and r. For η _max/a ₀, MRE and r show a logarithmic relationship, while for H _max and H _s, a quadratic relationship exists between them. Therefore, the choice of N _s is also important for extreme waves and is particularly meaningful for wave generation experiments in the wave flume.

Keywords

Spectral bandwidth / Significant wave components / Long-time wave evolution / Wave surface maximum / Maximum wave height

References

[1] Dommermuth DG, Yue DKP. A high-order spectral method for the study of nonlinear gravity waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 184: 267-288

[2] Dong G, Fu R, Ma Y, Fang K. Simulation of unidirectional propagating wave trains in deep water using a fully non-hydrostatic model. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 180: 254-266

[3] Doong DJ, Peng JP, Chen YC. Development of a warning model for coastal freak wave occurrences using an artificial neural network. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 169: 270-280

[4] Ducrozet G, Bonnefoy F, Ferrant F (2008) Analysis of freak waves formation with large scale fully nonlinear high order spectral simulations. 2008 International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, 47–54

[5] Dysthe KB, Trulsen K, Krogstad HE, Socquet-Juglard H. Evolution of a narrow-band spectrum of random surface gravity waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 478: 1-10

[6] Fujimoto W, Waseda T, Webb A. Impact of the four-wave quasi-resonance on freak wave shapes in the ocean. Ocean Dynamics, 2018, 69(1): 101-121

[7] Gramstad O, Trulsen K. Influence of crest and group length on the occurrence of freak waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 582: 463-472

[8] Janssen PAEM. Nonlinear four-wave interactions and freak waves. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2003, 33(4): 863-884

[9] Li J, Yang J, Liu S, Ji X. Wave groupiness analysis of the process of 2D freak wave generation in random wave trains. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 104: 480-488

[10] Luxmoore JF, Ilic S, Mori N. On kurtosis and extreme waves in crossing directional seas: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 876: 792-817

[11] Ma Y, Dong G, Perlin M, Ma X, Wang G. Experimental investigation on the evolution of the modulation instability with dissipation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 711: 101-121

[12] Mori N. Effects of wave breaking on wave statistics for deep-water random wave train. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(2): 205-220

[13] Mori N. Occurrence probability of a freak wave in a nonlinear wave field. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31(2): 165-175

[14] Mori N, Janssen PAEM. On kurtosis and occurrence probability of freak waves. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2006, 36(7): 1471-1483

[15] Onorato M, Osborne AR, Serio M, Bertone S. Freak waves in random oceanic sea states. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 86(25): 5831-5834

[16] Onorato M, Osborne AR, Serio M, Cavaleri L, Brandini C, Stansberg C. Extreme waves, modulational instability and second order theory: wave flume experiments on irregular waves. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2006, 25(5): 586-601

[17] Ponce de León S, Guedes Soares C. Extreme wave parameters under North Atlantic extratropical cyclones. Ocean Modelling, 2014, 81: 78-88

[18] Qi K. Long-term evolution of modulated Stokes wave trains and its associated freak wave characteristics, 2016, Nanjing: Hohai University, 46-56 (in Chinese)

[19] Ruban VP. Predictability of the appearance of anomalous waves at sufficiently small Benjamin-Feir indices. JETP Letters, 2016, 103(9): 568-572

[20] Tang T, Xu W, Barratt D, Bingham HB, Li Y, Taylor PH, Van Den Bremer TS, Adcock TAA. Spatial evolution of the kurtosis of steep unidirectional random waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 908: A-3

[21] Tao A. Nonlinear wave trains evolution and Freak wave generation mechanisms in deep water, 2007, Nanjing: Hohai University, 22-35 (in Chinese)

[22] Tao A, Qi K, Zheng J, Peng J, Wu Y. The occurrence probabilities of rogue waves in different nonlinear stages. 34th International Conference on Coastal Engineering 2014, Seoul, 2014, 1(34): 35

[23] Tao A, Xie S, Wu D, Fan J, Yang Y. The effects on water particle velocity of wave peaks induced by nonlinearity under different time scales. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9: 748

[24] Tao A, Yan Y, Zheng J, Zhang W (2010) Characteristics of Stokes wave train long time evolution. Chinese-German Joint Symposium on Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Tianjin, 284–287.

[25] Tao A, Zheng J, Chen B, Li H, Peng J (2012) Properties of freak waves induced by two kinds of nonlinear mechanisms. 33rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering 2012, Santander, Spain

[26] West BJ, Brueckner KA, Janda RS, Milder DM, Milton RL. A new numerical method for surface hydrodynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1987, 92(C11): 11803-11824

[27] Wu G. Direct simulation and deterministic prediction of large scale nonlinear ocean wave field, 2004, Cambridge, USA: massachusetts Institute of Technology

[28] Xia W, Ma Y, Dong G. Numerical simulation of freak waves in random sea state. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 116: 366-372

[29] Xiao W, Liu Y, Wu G, Yue DKP. Rogue wave occurrence and dynamics by direct simulations of nonlinear wave-field evolution. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 720: 357-392

[30] Zheng K, Zhao B, Duan W, Ertekin R, Chen X. Simulation of evolution of gravity wave groups with moderate steepness. Ocean Modelling, 2016, 98: 1-11