Structural Integrity Assessment of Offshore Jackets Considering Proper Modeling of Buckling in Tubular Members—a Case Study of Resalat Jacket

Abstract

In the present research, results of buckling analysis of 384 finite element models, verified using three different test results obtained from three separate experimental investigations, were used to study the effects of five parameters such as D/t, L/D, imperfection, mesh size and mesh size ratio. Moreover, proposed equations by offshore structural standards concerning global and local buckling capacity of tubular members including former API RP 2A WSD and recent API RP 2A LRFD, ISO 19902, and NORSOK N-004 have been compared to FE and experimental results. One of the most crucial parts in the estimation of the capacity curve of offshore jacket structures is the correct modeling of compressive members to properly investigate the interaction of global and local buckling which leads to the correct estimation of performance levels and ductility. Achievement of the proper compressive behavior of tubular members validated by experimental data is the main purpose of this paper. Modeling of compressive braces of offshore jacket platforms by 3D shell or solid elements can consider buckling modes and deformations due to local buckling. ABAQUS FE software is selected for FE modeling. The scope of action of each of elastic buckling, plastic buckling, and compressive yielding for various L/r ratios is described. Furthermore, the most affected part of each parameter on the buckling capacity curve is specified. The pushover results of the Resalat Jacket with proper versus improper modeling of compressive members have been compared as a case study. According to the results, applying improper mesh size for compressive members can under-predict the ductility by 33% and under-estimate the lateral loading capacity by up to 8%. Regarding elastic stiffness and post-buckling strength, the mesh size ratio is introduced as the most effective parameter. Besides, imperfection is significantly the most important parameter in terms of critical buckling load.

Keywords

Critical buckling load / Compressive behavior / Post-buckling strength / Local buckling / Tubular members / Jacket type offshore platforms

References

[1] Bardi FC, Kyriakides S. Plastic buckling of circular tubes under axial compression—part I: experiments. International journal of mechanical sciences, 2006, 48(8): 830-841

[2] Bardi FC, Kyriakides S, Yun HD. Plastic buckling of circular tubes under axial compression—part II: analysis. International journal of mechanical sciences, 2006, 48(8): 842-854

[3] Buchanan C, Real E, Gardner L. Testing, simulation and design of cold-formed stainless steel CHS columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 130: 297-312

[4] Dhanens F, Lagae G, Rathé J, Van IR. Stresses in and buckling of unstiffened cylinders subjected to local axial loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1993, 27(1–3): 89-106

[5] Fajuyitan OK, Sadowski AJ, Wadee MA, Rotter JM. Nonlinear behaviour of short elastic cylindrical shells under global bending. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 124: 574-587

[6] Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM. A numerical imperfection sensitivity study of cold-formed thin-walled tubular steel columns at uniform elevated temperatures. Thin-Walled Structures, 2004, 42(4): 533-555

[7] Godat A, Legeron F, Bazonga D. Stability investigation of local buckling behavior of tubular polygon columns under concentric compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 2012, 53: 131-140

[8] Harding JE, Dowling PJ, Dowling PJ, Agelidis N (1982) Buckling of Shells in offshore structures, Granada Haukaas M, Yang Q (2000) Development of a Grouted Beam Element for Pushover Analysis, Report OD-2005-0065. Offshore Design A/S, Sandvik

[9] Hu SZ, Prion HGL, Birkemoe PC. Influence of imperfections on the strength of unstiffened, fabricated, tubular beam-columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1993, 25(1–2): 43-61

[10] “ISO 19902” (2007) International Standard: Petroleum and natural gas industries-fixed steel offshore structures. International Organization for Standardization

[11] Karamanos SA, Tassoulas JL. Tubular members. II: Local buckling and experimental verification. Journal of engineering mechanics, 1996, 122(1): 72-78

[12] Karampour H. Effect of proximity of imperfections on buckle interaction in deep subsea pipelines. Marine structures, 2018, 59: 444-457

[13] Marshall PW (1992) Design of welded tubular connections: Basis and use of AWS code provisions. Developments in Civil Engineering, Volume 37. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., Amsterdam Offshore Design A/S (2000) Background Documentation on Ultimate Capacity Analysis using FE Codes—FE Analysis versus Structural Component Testing—Tests series 4—Beam Column Buckling, Tech. Rep. No. OD-1999-0140, Rev. 1

[14] Priyadarsini RS, Kalyanaraman V, Srinivasan SM. Numerical and experimental study of buckling of advanced fiber composite cylinders under axial compression. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2012, 12(04): 1250028

[15] Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Technical notes, National advisory committee for aeronautics, No. NACA-TN-902

[16] Sadowski AJ, Rotter JM. Solid or shell finite elements to model thick cylindrical tubes and shells under global bending. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2013, 74: 143-153

[17] Silvestre N. Buckling behaviour of elliptical cylindrical shells and tubes under compression. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2008, 45(16): 4427-4447

[18] Simulia DS (Dassault Systèmes) (2012) Abaqus 6.12 documentation. Providence, Rhode Island, US, 261, 2012

[19] Talaeitaba SB, Halabian M, Torki ME. Nonlinear behavior of FRP-reinforced concrete-filled double-skin tubular columns using finite element analysis. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 95: 389-407

[20] Tao Z, Han LH, Wang DY. Experimental behaviour of concrete-filled stiffened thin-walled steel tubular columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45(5): 517-527

[21] Thai HT, Uy B, Khan M. A modified stress-strain model accounting for the local buckling of thin-walled stub columns under axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 111: 57-69

[22] Verification_Manual_old.pdf

[23] Wang R, Shenoi RA. Experimental and numerical study on ultimate strength of steel tubular members with pitting corrosion damage. Marine Structures, 2019, 64: 124-137

[24] Weaver PM, Dickenson R. Interactive local/Euler buckling of composite cylindrical shells. Computers & structures, 2003, 81(30–31): 2767-2773

[25] Xia W, Hoogenboom PCJ. Buckling analysis of offshore jackets in removal operations. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2011, 44342: 449-454

[26] Yasseri S, Skinner K, Styles D (2006) Post buckling response study for high D/t tubular members