DCEFM Model for Emergency Risk Assessment of Ship Inflow

Mingyang Guo , Miao Chen , Kungang Wu , Yusong Li

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 170 -183.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2022, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3) : 170 -183. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-022-00291-w
Research Article

DCEFM Model for Emergency Risk Assessment of Ship Inflow

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper proposes a risk assessment model considering danger zone, capsizing time, and evaluation time factors (DCEFM) to quantify the emergency risk of ship inflow and calculate the degree of different factors to the emergency risk of water inflow. The DCEFM model divides the water inflow risk factors into danger zone, capsizing time, and evacuation time factors. The danger zone, capsizing time, and evacuation factors are calculated on the basis of damage stability probability, the numerical simulation of water inflow, and personnel evacuation simulation, respectively. The risk of a capsizing scenario is quantified by risk loss. The functional relationship between the location of the danger zone and the probability of damage, the information of breach and the water inflow time, the inclination angle and the evacuation time, and the contribution of different factors to the risk model of ship water inflow are obtained. Results of the DCEFM show that the longitudinal position of the damaged zone and the area of the breach have the greatest impact on the risk. A simple local watertight plate adjustment in the high-risk area can improve the safety of the ship.

Keywords

Ship inflow / Quantification of risk model / Risk factor analysis / Simulation / Subdivision design optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mingyang Guo, Miao Chen, Kungang Wu, Yusong Li. DCEFM Model for Emergency Risk Assessment of Ship Inflow. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2022, 21(3): 170-183 DOI:10.1007/s11804-022-00291-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bian J, Chen M, Han T. Cabin optimization method based on damaged ship safety. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2020, 15(2): 23-30

[2]

Brumley AT. The influence of human factors on the motor ability of passengers during the evacuation of ferries and cruise ships, 2000, London, UK: 2000 Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation

[3]

Bulian G, Cardinale M, Dafermos G, Lindroth D, Ruponen P, Zaraphonitis G (2020) Probabilistic assessment of damaged survivability of passenger ships in case of grounding or contact. Ocean Engineering 218: Art No. 107396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107396

[4]

Gao Q, Vassalos D. Numerical study of damage ship hydrodynamics. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 55: 199-205

[5]

Gao Z, Gao Q, Vassalos D. Numerical simulation of flooding of a damaged ship. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38(14–15): 1649-1662

[6]

Gao Z, Vassalos D, Gao Q. Numerical simulation of water flooding into a damaged vessel’s compartment by the volume of fluid method. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37(16): 1428-1442

[7]

Hashimoto H, Kawamura K, Sueyoshi M. A numerical simulation method for transient behavior of damaged ships associated with flooding. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 143: 282-294

[8]

Hu LF, Qi H, Li Y, Li W, Chen S. The CFD method-based research on damaged ship’s flooding process in time-domain. Polish Maritime Research, 2019, 26(1): 72-81

[9]

Hu T. Probability calculation of ship damage stability and its influence on subdivision. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1997, 31(11): 24-29

[10]

Huang WG. Calculation and analysis of ship probabilistic damage stability based on software FORAN. Shipbuilding of China, 2015, 56(S1): 177-184

[11]

Jasionowski A, Vassalos D (2006) Conceptualising risk. 9th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Rio de Janeiro

[12]

Kim I, Kim H, Han S (2020) An evacuation simulation for hazard analysis of isolation at sea during passenger ship heeling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(24): Art No. 9393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249393

[13]

Larmela M, Ruponen P, Sundell T. Validation of a simulation method for progressive flooding. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2007, 54(4): 305-321

[14]

Lee D, Park JH, Kim H. A study on experiment of human behavior for evacuation simulation. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31(8–9): 931-941

[15]

Lee SG, Zhao T, Nam JH (2013) Structural safety assessment of ship collision and grounding using FSI analysis technique. 6th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures (ICCGS), Trondheim, Norway, 197–204

[16]

Liwang H, Ringsberg JW, Norsell M. Probabilistic risk assessment for integrating survivability and safety measures on naval ships. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2012, 154: A21-A30

[17]

Lu SP, Bian JG, Chen M. Study on ship stability probability damage stability evaluation based on SOLAS 2009. Applied Science and Technology, 2018, 45(5): 16-21

[18]

Matsuda A, Kawamura K, Hashimoto H, Terada D (2016) An experimental system for measurement of dynamics of damaged ships. 16th Techno-Ocean Conference (Techno-Ocean), Kobe, Japan, 571–574

[19]

Owen M, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ. The exodus evacuation model applied to building evacuation scenarios. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 1996, 8(2): 65-84

[20]

Prill K, Szymczak M. Methodology for identification of potential threats and ship operations as a part of ship security assessment. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie, 2016, 120(48): 176-181

[21]

Stern F, Yang J, Wang Z, Sadat-Hosseini H, Mousaviraad M, Bhushan S, Xing T. Computational ship hydrodynamics: Nowadays and way forward. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2013, 60(1–4): 3-105

[22]

Vassalos D, Mujeeb-Ahmed MP(2021) Conception and evolution of the probabilistic methods for ship damage stability and flooding risk assessment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9(6): Art No. 667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060667

[23]

Vassalos D, Kim H, Christiansen G (2001) A mesoscopic model for passenger evacuation in a virtual ship-sea environment and performance-based evaluation. The Evacuation Simulation Group of the Ship Stability Research Centre, University of Strathclyde

[24]

Vassalos D, Turan O, Pawlowski M. Dynamic stability assessment of damaged passenger/Ro-Ro ships and proposal of rational survival criteria. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 1997, 34(4): 241

[25]

Veeraswamy A, Galea ER, Filippidis L, Lawrence PJ, Haasanen S, Gazzard RJ, Smith TEL. The simulation of urban-scale evacuation scenarios with application to the Swinley forest fire. Safety Science, 2018, 102: 178-193

[26]

Wang X, Liu Z, Wang J, Loughney S, Yang Z, Gao X (2021) Experimental study on individual walking speed during emergency evacuation with the influence of ship motion. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 562: Art No. 125369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125369

[27]

Zhang X, Lin Z, Li P, Liu D, Li Z, Pang Z, Wang M. A numerical investigation on the effect of symmetric and asymmetric flooding on the damage stability of a ship. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2020, 25(4): 1151-1165

[28]

Zhang X, Lin Z, Mancini S, Li P, Liu D, Liu F, Pang Z (2020b) Numerical investigation into the effect of damage openings on ship hydrodynamics by the overset mesh technique. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8(1): Art No. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010011

[29]

Zhang X, Lin Z, Mancini S, Pang Z, Li P, Liu F (2021) Numerical investigation into the effect of the internal opening arrangements on motion responses of a damaged ship. Applied Ocean Research 117: Art No. 102943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102943

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

174

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/