Investigation of Numerical Conditions of Moving Particle Semi-implicit for Two-Dimensional Wedge Slamming

Abstract

The sensitivity of moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) simulations to numerical parameters is investigated in this study. Although the verification and validation (V&V) are important to ensure accurate numerical results, the MPS has poor performance in convergences with a time step size. Therefore, users of the MPS need to tune numerical parameters to fit results into benchmarks. However, such tuning parameters are not always valid for other simulations. We propose a practical numerical condition for the MPS simulation of a two-dimensional wedge slamming problem (i.e., an MPS-slamming condition). The MPS-slamming condition is represented by an MPS-slamming number, which provides the optimum time step size once the MPS-slamming number, slamming velocity, deadrise angle of the wedge, and particle size are decided. The simulation study shows that the MPS results can be characterized by the proposed MPS-slamming condition, and the use of the same MPS-slamming number provides a similar flow.

Keywords

Wedge slamming / Moving particle semi-implicit / MPS-slamming condition / Numerical condition / Wagner’s theory / Computational fluid dynamics

References

[1] Allen T (2013) Mechanics of flexible composite hull panels subjected to water impacts. PhD thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

[2] Chen Y, Khabakhpasheva T, Maki KJ, Korobkin A. Wedge impact with the influence of ice. Appl Ocean Res, 2019, 89: 12-22

[3] Chuang SL. Experiments on slamming of wedge-shaped bodies. J Ship Res, 1967, 11(3): 190-198

[4] Cointe R, Armand JL. Hydrodynamic impact analysis of a cylinder. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 1987, 109(3): 237-243

[5] Dobrovol’Skaya ZN. On some problems of similarity flow of fluid with a free surface. J Fluid Mech, 1969, 36(4): 805-829

[6] Duan G, Matsunaga T, Yamaji A, Koshizuka S, Sakai M. Imposing accurate wall boundary conditions in corrective-matrix-based moving particle semi-implicit method for free surface flow. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 2021, 93(1): 148-175

[7] Faltinsen OM (1993) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, pp 282–315

[8] Faltinsen OM. Water entry of a wedge by hydroelastic orthotropic plate theory. J Ship Res, 1999, 43(3): 180-193

[9] Fourey G, Hermange C, Le Touzé D, Oger G. An efficient FSI coupling strategy between smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element methods. Comput Phys Commun, 2017, 217: 66-81

[10] Hermange C, Oger G, Le Touzé D. Energy considerations in the SPH method with deformable boundaries and application to FSI problems. Journal of Computational Physics: X, 2019, 1

[11] Hwang SC, Park JC, Gotoh H, Khayyer A, Kang KJ. Numerical simulations of sloshing flows with elastic baffles by using a particle-based fluid–structure interaction analysis method. Ocean Eng, 2016, 118: 227-241

[12] Ikari H, Khayyer A, Gotoh H. Corrected higher order Laplacian for enhancement of pressure calculation by projection-based particle methods with applications in ocean engineering. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, 2015, 1(4): 361-376

[13] Iribe T, Nakaza E. An improvement of accuracy of the MPS method with a new gradient calculation model. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), 2011, 67(1): 36-48 in Japanese)

[14] Jain U, Novakovic V, Bogaert H, van der Meer D (2020) On wedge-slamming pressures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10378

[15] Jalalisendi M, Zhao S, Porfiri M. Shallow water entry: modeling and experiments. J Eng Math, 2017, 104(1): 131-156

[16] Judge C, Mousaviraad M, Stern F, Lee E, Fullerton A, Geiser J, Schleicher C, Merrill G, Weil C, Morin J, Jiang M, Ikeda C. Experiments and CFD of a high-speed deep-V planing hull–part II: Slamming in waves. Appl Ocean Res, 2020, 97: 102059

[17] Kamath A, Bihs H, Arntsen ØA. Study of water impact and entry of a free falling wedge using computational fluid dynamics simulations. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 2017, 139(3): 031802

[18] Khabakhpasheva TI, Korobkin AA. Elastic wedge impact onto a liquid surface: Wagner’s solution and approximate models. J Fluids Struct, 2013, 36: 32-49

[19] Khayyer A, Gotoh H. Modified moving particle semi-implicit methods for the prediction of 2D wave impact pressure. Coast Eng, 2009, 56(4): 419-440

[20] Khayyer A, Gotoh H. A higher order Laplacian model for enhancement and stabilization of pressure calculation by the MPS method. Appl Ocean Res, 2010, 32(1): 124-131

[21] Khayyer A, Gotoh H. Enhancement of stability and accuracy of the moving particle semi-implicit method. J Comput Phys, 2011, 230(8): 3093-3118

[22] Khayyer A, Gotoh H. A multiphase compressible-incompressible particle method for water slamming. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2016, 26(1): 20-25

[23] Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Falahaty H, Shimizu Y. An enhanced ISPH-SPH coupled method for simulation of incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions. Comput Phys Commun, 2018, 232: 139-164

[24] Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Falahaty H, Shimizu Y. Towards development of enhanced fully-Lagrangian mesh-free computational methods for fluid-structure interaction. J Hydrodyn, 2018, 30(1): 49-61

[25] Khayyer A, Tsuruta N, Shimizu Y, Gotoh H. Multi-resolution MPS for incompressible fluid-elastic structure interactions in ocean engineering. Appl Ocean Res, 2019, 82: 397-414

[26] Kihara H (2004) Numerical modeling of flow in water entry of a wedge. Proc. 19th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Cortona, Italy, pp 28–31

[27] Korobkin A. Analytical models of water impact. Eur J Appl Math, 2004, 15(6): 821-838

[28] Koshizuka S, Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123(3): 421-434

[29] Maki KJ, Lee D, Troesch AW, Vlahopoulos N. Hydroelastic impact of a wedge-shaped body. Ocean Eng, 2011, 38(4): 621-629

[30] Marrone S, Colagrossi A, Le Touzé D, Graziani G. Fast free-surface detection and level-set function definition in SPH solvers. J Comput Phys, 2010, 229(10): 3652-3663

[31] Matsunaga T, Koshizuka S (2021) Improvement of the time marching method in a particle method. Transactions of the JSME, 20–00437. (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.20-00437

[32] Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2002, 38(3): 209-272

[33] Oger G, Doring M, Alessandrini B, Ferrant P. Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries. J Comput Phys, 2006, 213(2): 803-822

[34] Oger G, Guilcher PM, Jacquin E, Brosset L, Deuff JB, Le Touzé D. Simulations of hydro-elastic impacts using a parallel SPH model The Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2009, Japan: Osaka, I-09-038

[35] Panciroli R, Porfiri M. Evaluation of the pressure field on a rigid body entering a quiescent fluid through particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids, 2013, 54(12): 1630

[36] Piro DJ, Maki KJ. Hydroelastic analysis of bodies that enter and exit water. J Fluids Struct, 2013, 37: 134-150

[37] Seddon CM, Moatamedi M. Review of water entry with applications to aerospace structures. Int J Impact Eng, 2006, 32(7): 1045-1067

[38] Sun H, Faltinsen OM. The influence of gravity on the performance of planing vessels in calm water. J Eng Math, 2007, 58(1–4): 91-107

[39] Tajima M, Yabe T. Simulation on slamming of a vessel by CIP method. J Phys Soc Jpn, 1999, 68(8): 2576-2584

[40] Tanaka M, Masunaga T. Stabilization and smoothing of pressure in MPS method by quasi-compressibility. J Comput Phys, 2010, 229(11): 4279-4290

[41] Tsuruta N, Khayyer A, Gotoh H. A short note on dynamic stabilization of moving particle semi-implicit method. Comput Fluids, 2013, 82: 158-164

[42] Tsuruta N, Khayyer A, Gotoh H. Space potential particles to enhance the stability of projection-based particle methods. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2015, 29(1): 100-119

[43] Tveitnes T, Fairlie-Clarke AC, Varyani K. An experimental investigation into the constant velocity water entry of wedge-shaped sections. Ocean Eng, 2008, 35(14–15): 1463-1478

[44] Vincent L, Xiao T, Yohann D, Jung S, Kanso E. Dynamics of water entry. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 846: 508-535

[45] Wagner H. Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgänge an der Oberfläche von Flüssigkeiten. Z Angew Math Mech, 1932, 12(4): 193-215 in German)

[46] Wang J, Faltinsen OM. Improved numerical solution of Dobrovol’skaya’s boundary integral equations on similarity flow for uniform symmetrical entry of wedges. Appl Ocean Res, 2017, 66: 23-31

[47] Wang J, Zhang X. Improved Moving Particle Semi-implicit method for multiphase flow with discontinuity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 2019, 346: 312-331

[48] Wang S, Guedes Soares C. Review of ship slamming loads and responses. J Mar Sci Appl, 2017, 16(4): 427-445

[49] Waskito KT, Kashiwagi M, Iwashita H, Hinatsu M. Prediction of nonlinear vertical bending moment using measured pressure distribution on ship hull. Appl Ocean Res, 2020, 101

[50] Watanabe I. Analytical expression of hydrodynamic impact pressure by matched asymptotic expansion technique. Transactions of the West-Japan Society of Naval Architects, 1986, 71: 77-85

[51] Wendland H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv Comput Math, 1995, 4(1): 389-396

[52] Yettou EM, Desrochers A, Champoux Y. Experimental study on the water impact of a symmetrical wedge. Fluid Dyn Res, 2006, 38(1): 47

[53] Yokoyama Y, Iida T (2021) Simulations of wedge slamming in vicinity of floating ice using particle-based solver. The 31st International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, pp I-21–1265

[54] Zhao R, Faltinsen O. Water entry of two-dimensional bodies. J Fluid Mech, 1993, 246: 593-612