Reliability Analysis Method of a Control System for Subsea All-Electric Christmas Tree

Peng Liu , Qianqian Chen , Chao Zheng , Guofa Sun

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2) : 354 -370.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2) : 354 -370. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-021-00200-7
Research Article

Reliability Analysis Method of a Control System for Subsea All-Electric Christmas Tree

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The subsea all-electric Christmas tree (XT) is a key equipment in subsea production systems. Once it fails, the marine environment will be seriously polluted. Therefore, strict reliability analysis and measures to improve reliability must be performed before a subsea all-electric XT is launched; such measures are crucial to subsea safe production. A fault-tolerant control system was developed in this paper to improve the reliability of XT. A dual-factor degradation model for electrical control system components was proposed to improve the evaluation accuracy, and the reliability of the control system was analyzed based on the Markov model. The influences of the common cause failure and the failure rate in key components on the reliability and availability of the control system were studied. The impacts of mean time to repair and incomplete repair strategy on the availability of the control system were also investigated. Research results show the key factors that affect system reliability, and a specific method to improve the reliability and availability of the control system was given. This reliability analysis method for the control system could be applied to general all-electric subsea control systems to guide their safe production.

Keywords

Subsea all-electric Christmas tree / Control system / Reliability analysis / Safe production / Dual-factor degradation model / Markov model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Peng Liu, Qianqian Chen, Chao Zheng, Guofa Sun. Reliability Analysis Method of a Control System for Subsea All-Electric Christmas Tree. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2021, 20(2): 354-370 DOI:10.1007/s11804-021-00200-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abaei MM, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Chai S, Khan F. Reliability assessment of marine floating structures using Bayesian network. Appl Ocean Res, 2018, 76: 51-60

[2]

Artana KB, Pitana T, Dinariyana DP, Ariana M, Kristianto D, Pratiwi E. Real-time monitoring of subsea gas pipelines, offshore platforms, and ship inspection scores using an automatic identification system. J Mar Sci Appl, 2018, 17(1): 101-111

[3]

Barbosa JD, Santos RC, Romero JFA, Asano PTL, Neto AVS, Camargo JB, Almeida JR, Cugnasca PS. A methodology for reliability assessment of substations using fault tree and Monte Carlo simulation. Electr Eng, 2019, 101(1): 57-66

[4]

Bhattacharyya SK, Cheliyan AS. Optimization of a subsea production system for cost and reliability using its fault tree model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2019, 185: 213-219

[5]

Bitanov A (2015) Reliability study of subsea control module with focus on statistical methods. Master thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 1-5

[6]

Cai B, Liu H, Xie M. A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2016, 80: 31-44

[7]

Cai B, Liu Y, Xie M. A dynamic-Bayesian-network-based fault diagnosis methodology considering transient and intermittent faults. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 2016, 14(1): 276-285

[8]

Cai B, Shao X, Liu Y, Kong X, Wang H, Xu H, Ge W. Remaining useful life estimation of structure systems under the influence of multiple causes: subsea pipelines as a case study. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 67(7): 5737-5747

[9]

Cao L, Li Z, Guo C, Li P, Meng X, Wang T. Design and test of the MEMS coupled piezoelectric–electromagnetic energy harvester. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2019, 20(4): 673-686

[10]

Cao L, Cai Y, Xu G, Cui J. Research on output characteristics of double-ended fixed beam piezoelectric energy harvester under random excitation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2020, 21: 1075-1083

[11]

Carroll J, McDonald A, McMillan D. Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy, 2016, 19(6): 1107-1119

[12]

Chebila M. Simultaneous evaluation of safety integrity’s performance indicators with a generalized implementation of common cause failures. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018, 117: 214-222

[13]

Chen C, Yang Y, Wang M, Zhang X. Characterization and evolution of emergency scenarios using hybrid Petri net. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018, 114: 133-142

[14]

Choi I-H, Chang D. Reliability and availability assessment of seabed storage tanks using fault tree analysis. Ocean Eng, 2016, 120: 1-14

[15]

Deyab SM, Taleb-Berrouane M, Khan F, Yang M. Failure analysis of the offshore process component considering causation dependence. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018, 113: 220-232

[16]

Don MG, Khan F. Dynamic process fault detection and diagnosis based on a combined approach of hidden Markov and Bayesian network model. Chem Eng Sci, 2019, 201: 82-96

[17]

Elusakin T, Shafiee M. Reliability analysis of subsea blowout preventers with condition-based maintenance using stochastic Petri nets. J Loss Prev Process Ind, 2020, 63: 104026

[18]

Feng G, Wang D, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. Reliability analysis based on a direct ship hull strength assessment. J Mar Sci Appl, 2015, 14(4): 389-398

[19]

Henriquez P, Alonso JB, Ferrer MA, Travieso CM. Review of automatic fault diagnosis systems using audio and vibration signals. IEEE Transact Syst Man Cybern: Syst, 2013, 44(5): 642-652

[20]

Hokstad P, Bodsberg L. Reliability model for computerized safety systems, 1989, Atlanta: Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 435-440

[21]

Jones B, Jenkinson I, Yang Z, Wang J. The use of Bayesian network modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2010, 95(3): 267-277

[22]

Kim S, Chung S, Yang Y. Availability analysis of subsea blowout preventer using Markov model considering demand rate. Int J Naval Architect Ocean Eng, 2014, 6(4): 775-787

[23]

Konovessis D, Cai W, Vassalos D. Development of Bayesian network models for risk-based ship design. J Mar Sci Appl, 2013, 12(2): 140-151

[24]

Labovská Z, Labovský J, Jelemenský Ľ, Dudáš J, Markoš J. Model-based hazard identification in multiphase chemical reactors. J Loss Prev Process Ind, 2014, 29: 155-162

[25]

Li W, Cao Q, He M, Sun Y. Industrial non-routine operation process risk assessment using job safety analysis (JSA) and a revised Petri net. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018, 117: 533-538

[26]

Li M, Kang J, Sun L, Wang M. Development of optimal maintenance policies for offshore wind turbine gearboxes based on the non-homogeneous continuous-time Markov process. J Mar Sci Appl, 2019, 18(1): 93-98

[27]

Lihou DA, Spence GD. Proper use of data with the Weibull distribution. J Loss Prev Process Ind, 1988, 1(2): 110-113

[28]

Liu G, Li H, Qiu Z, Leng D, Li Z, Li W. A mini review of recent progress on vortex-induced vibrations of marine risers. Ocean Eng, 2019, 195: 106704

[29]

Liu P, Liu Y, Wei X, Xin C, Sun Q, Wu X. Performance analysis and optimal design based on dynamic characteristics for pressure compensated subsea all-electric valve actuator. Ocean Eng, 2019, 191: 106568

[30]

Liu P, Liu Y, Cai B, Wu X, Wang K, Wei X, Xin C. A dynamic Bayesian network based methodology for fault diagnosis of subsea Christmas tree. Appl Ocean Res, 2020, 94: 101990

[31]

Lyu S, Duan M, Liang W, Chen J, Xie Z (2014) Reliability evaluation for subsea X-mas tree control system based on Bayesian networks. The Twenty-fourth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea, 271

[32]

Matsuoka T, Kobayashi M. GO-FLOW: a new reliability analysis methodology. Nucl Sci Eng, 1988, 98(1): 64-78

[33]

Moss TR. The reliability data handbook, 2005, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 32-37

[34]

Nhat DM, Venkatesan R, Khan F. Data-driven Bayesian network model for early kick detection in industrial drilling process. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2020, 138: 130-138

[35]

Participants O. OREDA offshore reliability data handbook. vol. 4th, 2002, Høvik: Det Norske Veritas, 102-127

[36]

Ramos AG, de Souza GFM (2017) Availability assessment of an offshore gas treatment system using Stochastic Petri Nets. The 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, California, USA, 197

[37]

Rathnayaka S, Khan F, Amyotte P. Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility. J Loss Prev Process Ind, 2012, 25(2): 414-423

[38]

Sakurahara T, Schumock G, Reihani S, Kee E, Mohaghegh Z. Simulation-informed probabilistic methodology for common cause failure analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2019, 185: 84-99

[39]

Sandtorv HA, Hokstad P, Thompson DW. Practical experience with a data collection project: the OREDA project. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 1996, 51(2): 159-167

[40]

Silva AHM, da Hora, HRM, Fernandes RM (2018) Reliability assessment of a subsea electro-hydraulic control system. Proceedings IRF2018: 6th International Conference Integrity-Reliability-Failure, Lisbon, 1031-1038

[41]

Stendebakken OI (2014) A reliability study of a deepwater vertical Xmas tree with attention to XT retrieval rate. Master thesis, Institutt for Marin Teknikk, Norwegian, 21-50

[42]

Toroody AB, Abaiee MM, Gholamnia R, Ketabdari MJ. Epistemic-based investigation of the probability of hazard scenarios using Bayesian network for the lifting operation of floating objects. J Mar Sci Appl, 2016, 15(3): 250-259

[43]

Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Eng, 2003, 27(3): 313-326

[44]

Volovoi V. Modeling of system reliability Petri nets with aging tokens. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2004, 84(2): 149-161

[45]

Wang X, Jia P, Lizhang H, Wang L, Yun F, Wang H. Reliability and safety modelling of the electrical control system of the subsea control module based on Markov and multiple beta factor model. IEEE Access, 2018, 7: 6194-6208

[46]

Wang H, Yajima A, Castaneda H. A stochastic defect growth model for reliability assessment of corroded underground pipelines. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2019, 123: 179-189

[47]

Wang L, Wang X, Lizhang H, Jia P, Yun F, Wang H. Design and reliability analysis of the electrical control system of the subsea control module. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng, 2019, 233(6): 720-733

[48]

Wang Y, Zhang P, Qin G. Non-probabilistic time-dependent reliability analysis for suspended pipeline with corrosion defects based on interval model. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2019, 124: 290-298

[49]

Wang Y, Hou X, Zhang P, Qin G. Reliability assessment of multi-state reconfiguration pipeline system with failure interaction based on Cloud inference. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2020, 137: 116-127

[50]

Wanvik PG (2015) Reliability assessment of subsea X-mas tree configurations. Master thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 12-30

[51]

Xie X, Guo D. Human factors risk assessment and management: process safety in engineering. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018, 113: 467-482

[52]

Yu J, Zhao HL. All-electric subsea production control system. Appl Mech Mater Trans Tech Publ, 2013, 251: 196-200

[53]

Zhang H, Innal F, Dufour F, Dutuit Y. Piecewise deterministic Markov processes based approach applied to an offshore oil production system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2014, 126: 126-134

[54]

Zhang J, Liu Y, Lundteigen M, Bouillaut L (2016) Using Bayesian networks to quantify the reliability of a subsea system in the early design. Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016, Glasgow, Scotland, 404

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

205

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/