A Numerical Investigation of an Abnormal Phenomenon of Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) in a Cracked T-Butt Joint Accounting for Welding Effect

Abstract

Industry design standards such as BS 7910 deployed some empirical formulas for the prediction of stress intensity factor (SIF) based on simulation results from traditional finite element method (FEM). However, such FEM simulation occasionally failed to convince people due to the large discrepancies compared with engineering practice. As a consequence, inaccuracy predictions via such formulas in engineering standards inevitably occur, which will compromise the safety of structures. In our previous research work, an abnormal phenomenon of SIF in a cracked T-butt joint accounting for welding effect has been observed. Compared with BS 7910, the calculation results of SIF at the surface points of welded specimens cannot be well predicted, with a large discrepancy appearing. In order to explore such problem with an abnormal increase at the surface points of cracked welded specimens, a numerical investigation in terms of SIF among BS 7910, XFEM, and FEM is performed in this paper. Numerical models on both a simple cracked plate without welding effect and a cracked T-butt joint with welding effect are developed through ABAQUS. Parametric studies in terms of the effects of varied crack depth to thickness ratio (a/T) and the effects of crack depth to crack half-length ratio (a/c) are carried out. Empirical solutions from BS 7910 are used for comparison. It is found that the XFEM can provide predictions of SIF at both the crack deepest point and crack surface point of a simple cracked plate as accurate as FEM. For a T-butt joint with a transverse stiffener, a large discrepancy in terms of the weld magnification factors (M _k) occurs at the crack surface point compared with empirical predictions. An exceptional increase of von Mises stress gradient in regions close to the weld-toe is found through the simulation of FEM, whereas a constant stress gradient is obtained through XFEM. The comparison results indicate an inappropriate prediction of SIF by the utilization of the empirical formulas in BS 7910. A more reasonable prediction of the SIF at the surface point of a crack is obtained by the XFEM. Therefore, further updating of the empirical solutions in BS 7910 for SIF accounting for welding effect is recommended.

Keywords

Stress intensity factor (SIF) / Crack / T-butt joint / BS 7910 / Extended finite element method (XFEM) / Finite element method (FEM)

References

[1] Alessi L, Correia J, Fantuzzi N. Initial design phase and tender designs of a jacket structure converted into a retrofitted offshore wind turbine. Energies, 2019, 12(4): 1-28

[2] Areias P, Belytschko T. Analysis of three-dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2005, 63(5): 760-788

[3] Areias P, Belytschko T. Non-linear analysis of shells with arbitrary evolving cracks using xfem. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2005, 62(3): 384-415

[4] Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 1999, 45(5): 601-620

[5] Bergara A, Dorado J, Martin-Meizoso A, Martínez-Esnaola J. Fatigue crack propagation in complex stress fields: Experiments and numerical simulations using the extended finite element method (XFEM). Int J Fatigue, 2017, 103: 112-121

[6] Bowness D, Lee M. Stress intensity factor solutions for semi-elliptical weld-toe cracks in T-butt geometries. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 1996, 19(6): 787-797

[7] Bowness D, Lee M. Prediction of weld toe magnification factors for semi-elliptical cracks in T-butt joints. Int J Fatigue, 2000, 22(5): 369-387

[8] BSI (2015) Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. Tech. Rep. BS 7910:2013+A1:2015, British Standards Institute, # 14. https://doi.org/10.3403/30241230

[9] Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G (2017) Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage–a literature review. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1037–1055

[10] Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W. Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with combined dent and metal loss. Marine Structures, 2018, 61: 188-201

[11] Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W. Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with metal loss. Marine Structures, 2018, 58: 242-253

[12] Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W. Residual ultimate strength of seamless metallic pipelines under a bending moment - a numerical investigation. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 164: 148-159

[13] da Silva AL, Correia J, de Jesus AM, Lesiuk G, Fernandes A, Calçada R, Berto F. Influence of fillet end geometry on fatigue behaviour of welded joints. Int J Fatigue, 2019, 123: 196-212

[14] Dake Y, Sridhar I, Zhongmin X, Kumar SB. Fracture capacity of girth welded pipelines with 3D surface cracks subjected to biaxial loading conditions. Int J Press Vessel Pip, 2012, 92: 115-126

[15] Dolbow J, Moës N, Belytschko T. An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact. Computer Methods Appl Mech Eng, 2001, 190(51-52): 6825-6846

[16] Gifford Jr LN, Hilton PD. Stress intensity factors by enriched finite elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1978, 10(3): 485-496

[17] Giner E, Sukumar N, Denia F, Fuenmayor F. Extended finite element method for fretting fatigue crack propagation. Int J Solids Struct, 2008, 45(22-23): 5675-5687

[18] Li Z, Jiang X, Hopman H, Zhu L, Liu Z. An investigation on the circumferential surface crack growth in steel pipes subjected to fatigue bending. Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2020, 105: 102403

[19] Lin X, Smith R. Finite element modelling of fatigue crack growth of surface cracked plates: Part III: Stress intensity factor and fatigue crack growth life. Eng Fract Mech, 1999, 63(5): 541-556

[20] Melenk JM, Babuška I. The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 1996, 139(1-4): 289-314

[21] Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 1999, 46(1): 131-150

[22] Newman Jr J, Raju I (1979) Analysis of surface cracks in finite plates under tension or bending loads. Tech. rep., Langley Research Center, Virginia, United States, NASA Technical Paper 1578

[23] Newman Jr J, Raju I. An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack. Eng Fract Mech, 1981, 15(1-2): 185-192

[24] Paris PC, Gomez MP, Anderson WE. A rational analytic theory of fatigue. The Trends of Engineering, 1961, 13: 9-14

[25] Schijve J (2001) Fatigue of structures and materials. Springer Science & Business Media

[26] Shi J, Chopp D, Lua J, Sukumar N, Belytschko T. Abaqus implementation of extended finite element method using a level set representation for three-dimensional fatigue crack growth and life predictions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2010, 77(14): 2840-2863

[27] Shipley RJ, Becker WT (2002) Failure analysis and prevention. ASM Handbook 11, 508

[28] Shiratori M, Miyoshi T (1986) Analysis of stress intensity factors for surface cracks subjected to arbitrarily distributed stresses. In: Computational Mechanics’ 86. Springer, pp 1027–1032

[29] Silva A, De Jesus A, Xavier J, Correia J, Fernandes A. Combined analytical-numerical methodologies for the evaluation of mixed-mode (I+ II) fatigue crack growth rates in structural steels. Eng Fract Mech, 2017, 185: 124-138

[30] Simulia D (2016) ABAQUS v6.14 - Documentation. ABAQUS. http://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.14/

[31] Singh I, Mishra B, Bhattacharya S, Patil R. The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method. Int J Fatigue, 2012, 36(1): 109-119

[32] Sukumar N, Moës N, Moran B, Belytschko T. Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2000, 48(11): 1549-1570

[33] Sukumar N, Prévost J-H. Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method part I: Computer implementation. Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40(26): 7513-7537

[34] Ventura G, Budyn E, Belytschko T. Vector level sets for description of propagating cracks in finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2003, 58(10): 1571-1592

[35] Wang X. Stress intensity factors and weight functions for deep semi-elliptical surface cracks in finite-thickness plates. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 2002, 25(3): 291-304

[36] Zettlemoyer N, Fisher J. Stress gradient correction factor for stress intensity at welded stiffeners and cover plates. Welding Journal, 1977, 56(12): 3938-3985

[37] Zhang Y, Tan T, Xiao Z, Zhang W, Ariffin M. Failure assessment on offshore girth welded pipelines due to corrosion defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 2016, 39(4): 453-466