Numerical Prediction of Laminar-to-Turbulent Transition Around the Prolate Spheroid

Abstract

In this work, the laminar-to-turbulent transition phenomenon around the two- and three-dimensional ellipsoid at different Reynolds numbers is numerically investigated. In the present paper, Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equations with the Spalart-Allmaras, SST k − ω, and SST-Trans models are used for numerical simulations. The possibility of laminar-to-turbulent boundary layer transition is summarized in phase diagrams in terms of skin friction coefficient and Reynolds number. The numerical results show that SST-Trans method can detect different aspects of flow such as adverse pressure gradient and laminar-to-turbulent transition onset. Our numerical results indicate that the laminar-to-turbulent transition location on the 6:1 prolate spheroid is in a good agreement with the experimental data at high Reynolds numbers.

Keywords

Laminar-to-turbulent transition / Shear stress transport turbulence model / Skin fraction / Three-dimensional ellipsoid

References

[1] Achenbach E. Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech, 1972, 54: 565-569

[2] Barberis D, Molton P. Experimental study of three-dimensional separation on a large-scale model. AIAA J, 1995, 33: 2107-2113

[3] Blaser S. Forces on the surface of small ellipsoidal particles immersed in a linear flow field. Chem Eng Sci, 2002, 57: 515-526

[4] Chang C, Liou BH, Chern RL. An analytical and numerical study of axisymmetric flow around spheroids. J Fluid Mech, 1992, 234: 219-246

[5] Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME. Bubbles, drops and particles, 1978, New York: Academic Press

[6] Constantinescu G, Squires K. Numerical investigations of flow over a sphere in the subcritical and supercritical regimes. Phys Fluid, 2004, 16: 1449-1466

[7] El Khoury GK, Andersson HI, Pettersen B. Cross-flow past a prolate spheroid at Reynolds number of 10000. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 659: 365-374

[8] Johnson SA, Thompson MC, Hourigan K (2004) Predicted low frequency structures in the wake of elliptical cylinders. Eur J of Mech- B/Fluids 23:229–239

[9] Kadivar E, Kadivar E (2018) Computational study of the laminar to turbulent transition over the SD7003 airfoil in ground effect. Thermophys Aeromech 25:497–505

[10] Kadiyala PK, Chattopadhyay H. Numerical simulation of transport phenomena due to array of round jets impinging on hot moving surface. Dry Technol, 2017, 35: 1742-1754

[11] Kadiyala PK, Chattopadhyay H. Numerical analysis of heat transfer from a moving surface due to impingement of slot jets. Heat Transfer Eng, 2018, 39: 98-106

[12] Karlsson A, Fureby C (2009) LES of the flow past a 6:1 prolate spheroid. Number AIAA-2009-1616 in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

[13] Kumar N, Kishore N (2009) 2-D Newtonian flow past ellipsoidal particles at moderate Reynolds numbers. Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and process Industries. Melbourne Australia

[14] Lakshmipathy S (2014) Evaluation of hybrid RANS/LES methods for computing flow over a prolate spheroid. In: New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics IX notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design, 124. Springer Verlag, Cham, pp 475–484

[15] Meier HU, Michel U, Kreplin HP (1987) The influence of wind tunnel turbulence on the boundary layer transition. International Symposium DFVLR Research Center. Göttingen

[16] Menter FR, Esch T, Kubacki S (2002) Transition modeling based on local variables. 5th International Symposium on Turbulence Modeling and Measurements. Mallorca, Spain

[17] Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R (2003) Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, heat and mass transfer 4. Begell House Inc. (2003)

[18] Menter FR, Langtry RB, Likki SR, Suzen YB, Huang PG, Völker S. A correlation based transition model using local variables part 1 - model formulation, 2004, Vienna: ASME-GT2004-53452, ASME TURBO EXPO

[19] Menter FR, Langtry R, Völker S. Transition modeling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow Turbul Combust, 2006, 77: 277-303

[20] Mikulencak DR, Morris JF. Stationary shear flow around fixed and free bodies at finite Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech, 2004, 520: 215-242

[21] Nakamura I. Steady wake behind a sphere. Phys Fluids, 1976, 19: 5-8

[22] Natarajan R, Acrivos A. The instability of the steady flow past spheres and disks. J Fluid Mech, 1993, 254: 323-344

[23] Pal TK, Chattopadhyay H, Mandal DK. Flow and heat transfer due to impinging annular jet. Int J Fluid Mech Res, 2019, 46: 119-209

[24] Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aerospatiale, 1994, 1: 5-21

[25] Taamneh Y. CFD simulations of drag and separation flow around ellipsoids. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2011, 5: 129-132

[26] Taneda S. Experimental investigation of the wake behind a sphere at low Reynolds numbers. J Phys Soc Jpn, 1956, 11: 1104-1108

[27] Tokuhiro A, Maekawa M, Iizuka K, Hishida K, Maeda M. Turbulent flow past a bubble and an ellipsoid using shadow-image and PIV techniques. Int J Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24: 1383-1406

[28] Tripathi A, Chhabra RP. Drag on spheroidal particles in dilatant fluids. AICHE J, 1995, 41: 728-731

[29] Tripathi A, Chhabra RP, Sunderarajan T. Power law fluid flow over spheroidal particles. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1994, 33: 403-410

[30] Wu JS, Faeth GM. Sphere wakes in still surroundings at intermediate Reynolds numbers. AIAA J, 1993, 31: 1448-1455