Ultimate Strength Assessment of Steel-Welded Hemispheres under External Hydrostatic Pressure

Abstract

This paper focusses on steel-welded hemispherical shells subjected to external hydrostatic pressure. The experimental and numerical investigations were performed to study their failure behaviour. The model was fabricated from mild steel and made through press forming and welding. We therefore considered the effect of initial shape imperfection, variation of thickness and residual stress obtained from the actual structures. Four hemisphere models designed with R/t from 50 to 130 were tested until failure. Prior to the test, the actual geometric imperfection and shell thickness were carefully measured. The comparisons of available design codes (PD 5500, ABS, DNV-GL) in calculating the collapse pressure were also highlighted against the available published test data on steel-welded hemispheres. Furthermore, the nonlinear FE simulations were also conducted to substantiate the ultimate load capacity and plastic deformation of the models that were tested. Parametric dependence of the level of sphericity, varying thickness and residual welding stresses were also numerically considered in the benchmark studies. The structure behaviour from the experiments was used to verify the numerical analysis. In this work, both collapse pressure and failure mode in the numerical model were consistent with the experimental model.

Keywords

Steel-welded hemisphere / Collapse pressure / Experiment / Nonlinear FEA / Ultimate strength formulation

References

[1] ABS, American Bureau of Shipping Rules for building and classing underwater vehicles, systems and hyperbaric facilities, 2011, USA: American Bureau of Shipping

[2] Błachut J. Buckling of sharp knuckle torispheres under external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct, 1998, 30: 55-77

[3] Błachut J. Experimental perspective on the buckling of pressure vessel components. Appl Mech Rev, 2014, 66: 30-33

[4] Blachut J. Locally flattened or dented domes under external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct, 2015, 97: 44-52

[5] Błachut J, Galletly GD. Influence of local imperfections on the collapse strength of domed end closures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 1993, 207: 197-207

[6] Błachut J, Galletly GD. Buckling strength of imperfect steel hemispheres. Thin-Walled Struct, 1995, 23: 1-20

[7] Blachut J, Galletly GD, Moffat DG (1991) An experimental and numerical study into the collapse strength of steel domes, in ‘buckling of shell structures, on land, in the sea and in the air, (ed.) J.F. Jullien. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. pp 344-358 (ISBN 1-85166-716-4)

[8] Blachut J, Galletly GD, Moreton DN. Buckling of near-perfect steel torispherical and hemispherical shells subjected to external pressure. AIAA, 1990, 28: 1971-1975

[9] Błachut J, Jaiswal OR. On the choice of initial geometric imperfections in externally pressurized shells. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME, 1999, 121: 71-76

[10] Chen Y, Zhang J, Tang W, Cui W, Zhang M, Wang F. Buckling of bi-segment spherical shells under hydrostatic external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct, 2017, 120: 1-8

[11] Cho S-R, Muttaqie T, Do QT, Kim SH, Kim SM, Han DH. Experimental investigations on the failure modes of ring-stiffened cylinders under external hydrostatic pressure. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng, 2018, 10: 711-729

[12] Cho S-R, Muttaqie T, Do QT, Park SH, Kim SM, So HY, Sohn JM. Experimental study on ultimate strength of steel-welded ring-stiffened conical shell under external hydrostatic pressure. Mar Struct, 2019, 67: 102634

[13] Costello MG (1970) The effect of residual stresses on the buckling strength of fabricated HY-80 steel hemispherical shell. Naval ship Research and Development Center. Report 340. USA

[14] Costello MG, Nishida K (1967) The inelastic buckling strength of fabricated HY 80 Steel hemispherical shell. US Naval Ship Research and Development Center. Report 230. USA

[15] Cui W. An overview of submersible research and development in China. J Mar Sci Appl, 2018, 17: 459-470

[16] DNV Veritas DN. Buckling strength analysis, 1995, Norway: Det Norske Veritas Classification AS

[17] DNV-GL, Det Norske Veritas - Germanischer Lloyd (2015) Rules for classification naval vessels, part 4 sub-surface ships chapter 1 submarines. DNV GL AS. Norway

[18] Evkin AY, Lykhachova OV. Energy barrier as a criterion for stability estimation of spherical shell under uniform external pressure. Int J Solids Struct, 2017, 118–119: 1339-1351

[19] Faulkner D. Effects of residual stresses on the ductile strength of plane welded grillages and of ring stiffened cylinders. J Strain Anal Eng Des, 1977, 12: 130-139

[20] Galletly GD, Blachut J. Buckling design of imperfect welded hemispherical shells subjected to external pressure. J Mech Eng Sci, 1991, 205: 175-188

[21] Galletly GD, Blachut J, Kruzelecki J. Plastic buckling of imperfect hemispherical shells subjected to external pressure. J Mech Eng Sci, 1987, 201: 153-170

[22] Grünitz L. Buckling strength of welded HY-80 spherical shells: a direct approach, 2004, Germany: Ph. D thesis. Arbeitsbereiche Schiffbau der Technischen Universität Hamburg

[23] Kendrick SB. Shape imperfections in cylinders and spheres: their importance in design and methods of measurement. J Strain Anal, 1977, 12: 117-122

[24] Kiernan TJ, Nishida K (1966) The buckling strength of fabricated HY-80 spherical shells. David Taylor Model Basin. Report 172. USA

[25] Krenzke MA, Kiernan TJ (1965) The effect of initial imperfection on the collapse strength of deep spherical shells. David Taylor Model Basin. Report 175. USA

[26] Kohnen W. MTS manned underwater vehicles 2017-2018 global industry overview. Mar Technol Soc J, 2018, 52: 125-151

[27] Moffat DG, Blachut J, Galletly GD. Collapse of externally pressurised petal-welded torispheres and hemispherical end closures, Proc.- of seventh Intl Conf. On pressure vessel technology – ICPVT7. VdTUV. Dusseldorf. Germany, 1992, 1992: 119-137

[28] NASA (1969) Buckling of thin-walled doubly-curved shells. NASA space vehicle design criteria (structure). NASA SP-8032. USA

[29] PD 5500 Specification for unfired fusion welded pressure vessels, 2003 British Standard Institution. UK

[30] Shao WJ, Frieze PA. Static and dynamic numerical analysis studies of hemispheres and spherical caps. Part I: background and theory. Thin-Walled Struct, 1989, 8: 99-118

[31] Shao WJ, Frieze PA. Static and dynamic numerical analysis studies of hemispheres and spherical caps. Part II: results and strength predictions. Thin-Walled Struct, 1989, 8: 99-118

[32] Shen J, Chen Z. Welding simulation of fillet-welded joint using shell elements with section integration. J Mater Process Technol, 2014, 214: 2529-2536

[33] Tekgoz M, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. Ultimate strength assessment of welded stiffened plates. Eng Struct, 2015, 84(2015): 325-339

[34] Wagner HNR, Hühne C, Niemann S. Robust knockdown factors for the design of spherical shells under external pressure: Development and validation. Int J Mech Sci, 2018, 141: 58-77

[35] Zhang J, Zhu B, Wang F, Tang W, Wang W, Zhang M (2017a) Buckling of prolate egg-shaped domes under hydrostatic external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct 119:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.022

[36] Zhang M, Hua Z, Tang W, Wang F, Wang S (2017b) Buckling of bi-segment spherical shells under hydrostatic external pressure. Thin-Walled Struct 120:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.08.017

[37] Zhang J, Zhang M, Cui W, Tang W, Wang F, Pan B (2018a) Elastic-plastic buckling of deep sea spherical pressure hulls. Mar Struct 57:38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.09.007

[38] Zhang J, Hua Z, Tang W, Wang F, Wang S (2018b) Buckling of externally pressurised egg-shaped shells with variable and constant wall thicknesses. Thin-Walled Struct 132:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.08.013

[39] Zhang J, Wang Y, Tang W, Zhu Y, Zhao X. Buckling of externally pressurised spherical caps with wall-thickness reduction. Thin-Walled Struct, 2019, 136: 129-137

[40] Zoelly R (1915) Uber ein Knickungsproblem an der Kugelschale. Ph.D Thesis. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000091951