An Efficient Acoustic Scattering Model Based on Target Surface Statistical Descriptors for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Systems

Nahid Nadimi , Reza Javidan , Kamran Layeghi

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 494 -507.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2020, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 494 -507. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-020-00163-1
Research Article

An Efficient Acoustic Scattering Model Based on Target Surface Statistical Descriptors for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Systems

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Acoustic scattering as the perturbation of an incident acoustic field from an arbitrary object is a critical part of the target-recognition process in synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) systems. The complexity of scattering models strongly depends on the size and structure of the scattered surface. In accurate scattering models including numerical models, the computational cost significantly increases with the object complexity. In this paper, an efficient model is proposed to calculate the acoustic scattering from underwater objects with less computational cost and time compared with numerical models, especially in 3D space. The proposed model, called texture element method (TEM), uses statistical and structural information of the target surface texture by employing non-uniform elements described with local binary pattern (LBP) descriptors by solving the Helmholtz integral equation. The proposed model is compared with two other well-known models, one numerical and other analytical, and the results show excellent agreement between them while the proposed model requires fewer elements. This demonstrates the ability of the proposed model to work with arbitrary targets in different SAS systems with better computational time and cost, enabling the proposed model to be applied in real environment.

Keywords

Underwater acoustic scattering / Synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) / Texture / Local binary pattern (LBP) / Target strength (TS) / Discretization method

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nahid Nadimi, Reza Javidan, Kamran Layeghi. An Efficient Acoustic Scattering Model Based on Target Surface Statistical Descriptors for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Systems. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2020, 19(3): 494-507 DOI:10.1007/s11804-020-00163-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BfN (2019) [Online] Availableat: https://www.bfn.de/themen/meeresnaturschutz/belastungen-im-meer/pipelines. Accessed 15 June 2019

[2]

Bonomo A, Isakson M, Chotiros N. A comparison of finite element and analytic models of acoustic scattering from rough poroelastic interfaces. J Acoust Soc Am, 2015, 137(4): EL235-EL240

[3]

Chai Y, Li W, Gong Z, Li T. Hybrid smoothed finite element method for two-dimensional underwater acoustic scattering problems. Ocean Eng, 2016, 116: 129-141

[4]

Chandler-Wilde S, Langdon S (2007) Boundary element methods for acoustics. Lecture notes, University of Reading, Department of Mathematics.

[5]

Copley L. Integral equation method for radiation from vibrating bodies. J Acoust Soc Am, 1967, 41(4A): 807-816

[6]

Dashen R, Henyey F, Wurmser D. Calculations of acoustic scattering from the ocean surface. J Acoust Soc Am, 1990, 88(1): 310-323

[7]

Dutt A. Effect of mesh size on finite element analysis of beam. Int J Mech Eng, 2015, 2(12): 8-10

[8]

Faran JJ Jr. Sound scattering by solid cylinders and spheres. J Acoust Soc Am, 1951, 23(4): 405-418

[9]

Fischell E, Schmidt H. Multistatic acoustic characterization of seabed targets. J Acoust Soc Am, 2017, 142(3): 1587-1596

[10]

Flax L, Dragonette L, Überall H. Theory of elastic resonance excitation by sound scattering. J Acoust Soc Am, 1978, 63(3): 723-731

[11]

Galusha A, Galusha G, Keller J, Zare A (2018) A fast target detection algorithm for underwater synthetic aperture sonar imagery. In Detection and Sensing of Mines. Int Soc Opt Photon:10628–106280Z. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2304976

[12]

Gaunaurd G. Sonar cross sections of bodies partially insonified by finite sound beams. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 1985, 10(3): 213-230

[13]

Hansen R, Kolev N (2011) Introduction to synthetic aperture sonar. INTECH Open Access. Publisher, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5772/23122

[14]

Hayes M, Gough P. Synthetic aperture sonar: a review of current status. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2009, 34(3): 207-224

[15]

Huang D, Shan C, Ardabilian M, Wang Y, Chen L. Local binary patterns and its application to facial image analysis: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev, 2011, 41(6): 765-781

[16]

Hunt J, Knittel M, Nichols C, Barach D. Finite−element approach to acoustic scattering from elastic structures. J Acoust Soc Am, 1975, 57(2): 287-299

[17]

Ihlenburg F (2006) Finite element analysis of acoustic scattering, vol 132. Springer Science & Business Media

[18]

Ju Y, Li J, Pan Y, Xu H (2018) Acoustic scattering from underwater target for low frequency based on finite element method. In 2018 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC) IEEE:724–727. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDPC.2018.8665014

[19]

Kargl S, España A, Williams K, Kennedy J, Lopes J. Scattering from objects at a water–sediment interface: experiment, high-speed and high-fidelity models, and physical insight. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2014, 40(3): 632-642

[20]

Karimi M, Croaker P, Kessissoglou N. Boundary element solution for periodic acoustic problems. J Sound Vib, 2016, 360: 129-139

[21]

Li X, Xu T, Chen B. Atomic decomposition of geometric acoustic scattering from underwater target. Appl Acoust, 2018, 140: 205-213

[22]

Liu Y, Glass G (2013) Effects of mesh density on finite element analysis. No. 2013-01-1375, SAE Technical Paper. https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1375

[23]

Liu L, Lao S, Fieguth P, Guo Y, Wang X, Pietikäinen M. Median robust extended local binary pattern for texture classification. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2016, 25(3): 1368-1381

[24]

Marine technology news (2019) [Online] Availableat: https://www.marinetechnologynews.com/news/kraken-sonar-begins-trading-509634. Accessed 15 June 2019

[25]

Nabelek T, Keller J, Galusha A, Zare A, (2018) Fractal analysis of seafloor textures for target detection in synthetic aperture sonar imagery. In Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XXIII. International Society for Optics and Photonics.10628(1062810):16 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2305023

[26]

Nennig B, Perrey-Debain E, Chazot J. The method of fundamental solutions for acoustic wave scattering by a single and a periodic array of poroelastic scatterers. Eng Anal Bound Elem, 2011, 35(8): 1019-1028

[27]

Nolte B, Ehrlich J, Hofmann HG, Schäfer I, Schäfke A, Stoltenberg A, Burgschweiger R. Numerical methods in underwater acoustics-sound propagation and backscattering. Hydroacoustics, 2015, 18: 127-140

[28]

Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2002, 24(7): 971-987

[29]

Okumura T, Masuya T, Takao Y, Sawada K. Acoustic scattering by an arbitrarily shaped body: An application of the boundary-element method. ICES J Mar Sci, 2003, 60(3): 563-570

[30]

Pierce A. Acoustics: an introduction to its physical principles and applications. Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1989. Chap, 1989, 10: 534

[31]

Pignier N, O’Reilly C, Boij S. A Kirchhoff approximation-based numerical method to compute multiple acoustic scattering of a moving source. Appl Acoust, 2015, 96: 108-117

[32]

Qin L, Huang H, Wang P, Zhang P, Wang Y, Liu J (2018) The 3D imaging for underwater objects using SAS processing based on sparse planar array. In 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO). IEEE,1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8559428

[33]

Richard A, Grande E, Brunskog J, Jeong C (2018) Characterization of acoustic scattering from objects via near-field measurements. European Acoustics Association:2195–2202

[34]

Schenck H. Improved integral formulation for acoustic radiation problems. J Acoust Soc Am, 1968, 44(1): 41-58

[35]

Song F, Li W, Wang M. Study on acoustic target strength characteristics of underwater composite rudder. Vibroengineering Procedia, 2017, 16: 87-90

[36]

Tesfaye G, Abiva J, Roberts R. Automated change detection: applications for synthetic aperture sonar and future capabilities. IEEE Syst Man Cybern Mag, 2019, 5(3): 60-C3

[37]

Waterman P. New formulation of acoustic scattering. J Acoust Soc Am, 1969, 45(6): 1417-1429

[38]

Wu TW (2000) Boundary element acoustics: fundamentals and computer codes. J Acoust Soc Am 111(4). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1456929

[39]

Yang Y, Li X. Blind source extraction based on time-frequency characteristics for underwater object acoustic scattering. Acta Phys Sin, 2016, 65(16): 164301

[40]

Zampolli M, Tesei A, Canepa G, Godin O. Computing the far field scattered or radiated by objects inside layered fluid media using approximate Green’s functions. J Acoust Soc Am, 2008, 123(6): 4051-4058

[41]

Zampolli M, Espana AL, Williams KL, Kargl SG, Thorsos EI, Lopes JL, Kennedy JL, Marston PL. Low-to mid-frequency scattering from elastic objects on a sand sea floor simulation of frequency and aspect dependent structural echoes. J Comput Acoust, 2012, 20(2): 1240007

[42]

Zhang J, Chen PM, Chen GB, Fang LC, Tang Y. Acoustic target strength measurement of banded grouper (Epinephelus awoara (Temming and Schlegel, 1842)) and threadsial filefish (Stephanolepis cirrhifer (Temming & Schlegel, 1850)) in the South China Sea. J Appl Ichthyol, 2014, 29(6): 63

[43]

Zhang W, Zhou T, Peng D, Shen J. Underwater pipeline leakage detection via multibeam sonar imagery. J Acoust Soc Am, 2017, 141(5): 3917-3917

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

138

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/