Wave and Current Effects on Floating Fish Farms

Odd M. Faltinsen , Yugao Shen

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2018, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 284 -296.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2018, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 284 -296. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-018-0033-5
Research Article

Wave and Current Effects on Floating Fish Farms

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The paper is partly a review on hydrodynamic and structural aspects offish farms. In addition, new numerical results are presented on the stochasticbehavior of bending stresses in the floater of a realistic net cage in extreme waveconditions. The behavior of traditional-type fish farms with net cages and closedfish farms in waves and currents is discussed. Hydroelasticity can play asignificant role for net cages and closed membrane-type fish farms. The many meshesin a net cage make CFD and complete structural modeling impracticable. As anexample, a hydrodynamic screen model and structural truss elements are instead usedto represent the hydrodynamic loading and the structural deformation of the net. Inaddition, the wake inside the net due to current plays an important role. Thedescribed simplified numerical method has been validated by comparing with modeltests of mooring loads on a single net cage with two circular elastic floaters andbottom weight ring in waves and currents. It is discussed which parts of thecomplete system play the most important roles in accurately determining the mooringloads. Many realizations of a sea state are needed to obtain reliable estimates ofextreme values in a stochastic sea. In reality, many net cages operate in closevicinity, which raises questions about spatial variations of the current and waveenvironment as well as hydrodynamic interaction between the net cages. Live fishtouching the netting can have a non-negligible influence on the mooring loads. It isdemonstrated by numerical calculations in waves and currents that a well boat at anet cage can have a significant influence on the mooring loads and the bendingstresses in the floater. The latter results provide a rational way to obtainoperational limits for a well boat at a fish farm. Sloshing has to be accounted forin describing the behavior of a closed fish farm when important wave frequencies arein the vicinity of natural sloshing frequencies. The structural flexibility has tobe considered in determining the natural sloshing frequencies for a membrane-typeclosed fish farm. Free-surface non-linearities can matter for sloshing and can, forinstance, result in swirling in a certain frequency domain for a closed cage with avertical symmetry axis.

Keywords

Wave / Current / Aquaculture / Net cage / Closed fish farm

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Odd M. Faltinsen, Yugao Shen. Wave and Current Effects on Floating Fish Farms. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2018, 17(3): 284-296 DOI:10.1007/s11804-018-0033-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bardestani M, Faltinsen OM (2013) A two-dimensional approximationof a floating fish farm in waves and current with the effect of snap loads,Proc. 32nd International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering, pp.V009T12A020-V009T12A020.Nantes, France. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2013-10487

[2]

Dong GH, Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Li YC, Gui FK. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic behavior ofgravity cage in irregular waves. Aquac Eng, 2010, 42(2): 90-101

[3]

Faltinsen OM. Sea loads on ships and offshore structures, 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228-238

[4]

Faltinsen OM, Timokha AN (2009) Sloshing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,135

[5]

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006) The state of worldaquaculture. FAO fisheries technical paper 500, Rome 134 pp.

[6]

Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P. Primary production of the biosphere: integratingterrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 1998, 281(5374): 237-240

[7]

He Z, Faltinsen OM, Fredheim A, Kristiansen T. The influence of fish on the mooring loads of afloating net cage. J Fluids Struct, 2017, 76: 384-395

[8]

Huang CC, Tang HJ, Liu JY. Dynamical analysis of net cage structures for marineaquaculture: numerical simulation and model testing. Aquac Eng, 2006, 35(3): 258-270

[9]

Huang CC, Tang HJ, Liu JY. Effects of waves and currents on gravity-type cagesin the open sea. Aquac Eng, 2008, 38(2): 105-116

[10]

Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM. Modeling of current loads on aquaculture netcages. J Fluids Struct, 2012, 34: 218-235

[11]

Kristiansen D, Faltinsen O M. Non-linear wave-induced motions of cylindrical-shaped floaters of fish farms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2009, 223(3): 361-375

[12]

Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM. Experimental and numerical study of an aquaculturenet cage with floater in waves and current. J Fluids Struct, 2014, 54: 1-26

[13]

Le Bris F, Marichal D. Numerical and experimental study of submerged supplenets applications to fish farms. J Mar Sci Technol, 1998, 3: 161-170

[14]

Li P, Faltinsen OM (2012) Wave-induced vertical response of anelastic circular collar of a floating fish farm, Proc.Tenth International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD 2012), St.Petersburg, Russia. 2, 58–64

[15]

Li P, Faltinsen OM, Greco M. Wave-induced accelerations of a fish-farm elasticfloater: experimental and numerical studies. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 2018, 140(1): 011201

[16]

Li P, Faltinsen OM, Lugni C. Nonlinear vertical accelerations of a floating torusin regular waves. J Fluids Struct, 2016, 66: 589-608

[17]

Løland G (1991) Current forces on and flow through fish farms. Dr.Ing. Thesis. Division of Marine Hydrodynamics. The Norwegian Institute ofTechnology

[18]

Marichal D (2003) Cod-end numerical study. In: Third InternationalConference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, Oxford, UK. 3,11–18

[19]

Naess A, Moan T (2012) Stochastic dynamics of marinestructures. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge University Press, New York, 176–179

[20]

Rognebakke OF, Faltinsen OM. Coupling of sloshing and ship motions. J Ship Res, 2003, 47(3): 208-221

[21]

NAS (2009) NS 9415 Marine fish farms—requirements for site survey,risk analysis, design, dimensioning, production, installation and operation. ICS65. 150;67.260. Standards Norway. Norway. (http://www.standard.no), 21–22

[22]

Newman JN. The exciting forces on fixed bodies inwaves. J Ship Res, 1962, 6(4): 10-17

[23]

Royon-Lebeaud A, Hopfinger WJ, Cartellier A. Liquid sloshing and wave breaking in circular andsquare-base cylindrical containers. J Fluid Mech, 2007, 577: 467-494

[24]

Shainee M, Leira BJ, Ellingsen H, Fredheim A. Investigation of a self-submersible SPM cage systemin random waves. Aquac Eng, 2014, 58: 35-44

[25]

Shen YG, Greco M, Faltinsen OM (2016) Numerical study of a coupledwell boat-fish farm system in waves and current during loading operations,12 th International Conference on Hydrodynamics,ICHD2016, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands

[26]

Shen YG, Greco M, Faltinsen OM, Nygaard I. Numerical and experimental investigations on mooringloads of a marine fish farm in waves and current. J Fluids Struct, 2018, 79: 115-136

[27]

Strand IM, Faltinsen OM. Linear sloshing in a 2D rectangular tank with aflexible sidewall. J Fluids Struct, 2017, 73: 70-81

[28]

Strand IM (2018) Sea loads on closed flexible fish cages. PhD thesis. Department of Mar Technol NorwegianUniversity of Sci Technol, Trondheim, 37–40

[29]

Xu TJ, Dong GH, Zhao YP, Li YC, Gui FK. Analysis of hydrodynamic behaviors of gravity netcage in irregular waves. Ocean Eng, 2011, 38(13): 1545-1554

[30]

Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Dong GH, Gui FK. Analysis of hydrodynamic behavior of a submersiblenet cage and mooring system in waves and current. Appl Ocean Res, 2013, 42: 155-167

[31]

Xu TJ, Zhao YP, Dong GH, Li YC, Gui FK. Analysis of hydrodynamic behaviors of multiple netcages in combined wave-current flow. J Fluids Struct, 2013, 39: 222-236

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

164

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/