Enabling a viable technique for the optimization of LNG carrier cargo operations

Abstract

In this study, we optimize the loading and discharging operations of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) carrier. First, we identify the required precautions for LNG carrier cargo operations. Next, we prioritize these precautions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and experts’ judgments, in order to optimize the operational loading and discharging exercises of the LNG carrier, prevent system failure and human error, and reduce the risk of marine accidents. Thus, the objective of our study is to increase the level of safety during cargo operations.

Keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP) / Optimization / LNG carrier cargo / precautions / safety

References

[1] Anderson DR, Dennis JS, Williams TA, Camm JD, Cochran JJ. An introduction to management science: quantitative approaches to decision making, 2015

[2] Arslan O. Quantitative evaluation of precautions on chemical tanker operations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009, 87: 113-120

[3] Cheng CH. Evaluating naval tactical missiles system by fuzzy ahp based on grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 343-350

[4] Dadkhah KM, Zahedi F. A mathematical treatment of inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Computing Modeling, 1993, 17(415): 111-122

[5] Hyde P, 2006). LNG Operational practice. Witherbys Seamanship, ISBN 1856093212.

[6] ISGOTT International safety guide for oil tanker and terminal, 2006

[7] Karahalios H, Yang ZL, Williams V, Wang J. A proposed system of hierarchical scorecards to assess the implementation of maritime regulations. Safety Science, 2011, 49: 450-462

[8] Liu FHF, Hai HL. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 97(3): 308-317

[9] Mishra AK, Deep S, Choudhary A. Identification of suitable sites for organic farming using the AHP and GIS. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2015, 18(2): 181-193

[10] Moon K, Song S, Ballesio J, Fitzgerald G, Knight G. Fire risk assessment of gas turbine propulsion system for LNG carriers. Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, 2009, 22: 908-914

[11] Nwaoha TC, Yang Z, Wang J, Bonsall S. Adoption of new advanced computational techniques to hazards ranking in LNG carrier operations. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 72(1): 31-44

[12] Riahi R, Bonsall S, Jenkinson I, Wang J. A seafarer’s reliability assessment incorporating subjective judgements. Journal of Engineering for Maritime Environment, 2012, 226(4): 313-334

[13] Rocha PMD, Barros APD, Silva GBD, Costa HG. Analysis of the operational performance of Brazilian airport terminals: a multicriteria approach with De Borda-AHP integration. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2016, 51: 19-26

[14] Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process, 1980, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1-287

[15] Sapsford R, Jupp V. Data collection and analysis, 2006

[16] Shang J, Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 85(2): 297-315

[17] Singh RP, Nachtnebel HP. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 55: 43-58

[18] Socaciu L, Giurgiu O, Banyai D, Simion M. PCM selection using AHP method to maintain thermal comfort of the vehicle occupants. Energy Procedia, 2016, 85: 489-497

[19] Takamura T, Tone K. A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo. Social-economic Planning Services, 2003, 37(2): 85-102

[20] Wang YM, Liu J, Elhag TM. An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2008, 54(3): 513-525

[21] Wedley WC. Consistency prediction for incomplete AHP matrices. Mathematical Computing Modeling, 1993, 17(415): 151-161

[22] Zhang XS, Cui JC. A project evaluation system in the state economic information system in china and operations research practice in public sector. International Transaction in Operational Research, 1999, 6(5): 441-452