Analysis of a new composite material for watercraft manufacturing

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the properties of an alternative material for use in marine engineering, namely a rigid and light sandwich-structured composite made of expanded polystyrene and fiberglass. Not only does this material have an improved section modulus, but it is also inexpensive, light, easy to manipulate, and commercially available in various sizes. Using a computer program based on the finite element method, we calculated the hogging and sagging stresses and strains acting on a prismatic boat model composed of this material, and determined the minimum sizes and maximum permissible stresses to avoid deformation. Finally, we calculated the structural weight of the resulting vessel for comparison with another structure of comparable dimensions constructed from the commonly used core material Divinycell.

Keywords

naval construction / computational analysis / composite material / sandwich-structure / expanded polystyrene / fiberglass / composite structure concepts / finite element method / economic viability

References

[1] Atkinson R. Innovative uses for sandwich constructions. Reinforced Plastics, 1997, 41(2): 30-33

[2] Bucalem ML, Bathe KJ. The mechanics of solids and structures–hierarchical modeling and the finite element solution, 2011

[3] Cerracchioa P, Gherlonea M, Di Sciuvaa M, Tesslerb A. A novel approach for displacement and stress monitoring of sandwich structures based on the inverse finite element method. Composite Structures, 2015, 127: 69-76

[4] Chalmers DW. The potential for the use of composite materials in marine structures. Marine Structures, 1994, 7(2-5): 441-456

[5] Cook RD. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 1974

[6] Craugh LE, Kwon YW. Coupled finite element and cellular automata methods for analysis of composite structures with fluid–structure interaction. Composite Structures, 2013, 102: 124-137

[7] Critchfield MO, Judy TD, Kurzweil AD. Low-Cost Design and Fabrication of Composite Ship Structures. Marine Structures, 1994, 7: 475-494

[8] Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E. Crupi comparison of aluminum sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam. Marine Structures, 2013, 30: 74-96

[9] Davies P, Choqueuse D, Bigourdan B. Test-finite element correlations for non-woven fibre-reinforced composites and sandwich panels. Marine Structures, 1994, 7: 345-363

[10] Eamon CD, Rais-Rohani M. Integrated reliability and sizing optimization of a large composite structure. Marine Structures, 2009, 22: 315-334

[11] Kimpara I. Use of advanced composite materials in marine vehicles. Marine Structures, 1991, 4(2): 117-127

[12] Lee KW, Chong TH, Park GJ. Development of a methodology for a simplified finite element model and optimum design. Computers and Structures, 2003, 81: 1449-1460

[13] Mouritz AP, Gellert E, Burchill P, Challis K. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Composite Structures, 2001, 53(1): 21-42

[14] Mouring SE. Buckling and post buckling of composite ship panels stiffened with preform frames. Ocean Engineering, 1999, 26: 793-803

[15] Pei Z, Iijima K, Fujikubo M, Tanaka S, Okazawa S, Yao T. Simulation on progressive collapse behavior of whole ship model under extreme waves using idealized structural unit method. Marine Structures, 2015, 40: 104-133

[16] Rajendran R, Lee JM. Blast loaded plates. Marine Structures, 2009, 22: 99-127

[17] Romanoff J, Varsta P. Bending response of web-core sandwich plates. Composite Structures, 2007, 81(2): 292-302

[18] SAP2000, 2015. Integrated software for structural analysis and design, analysis reference manual. Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA.

[19] Scott RJ. Fiberglass boat design and construction, 1996

[20] Shu Z, Moan T. Reliability analysis of a bulk carrier in ultimate limit state under combined global and local loads in the hogging and alternate hold loading condition. Marine Structures, 2011, 24: 1-22

[21] Stenius I, Rosén A, Kuttenkeuler J. On structural design of energy efficient small high-speed craft. Marine Structures, 2011, 24: 43-59

[22] Temple DW, Collette MD. Minimizing lifetime structural costs: Optimizing for production and maintenance under service life uncertainty. Marine Structures, 2015, 40: 60-72

[23] Torabizadeh MA. Tensile, compressive and shear properties of unidirectional glass/Epoxy composites subjected to mechanical loading and low temperature services. Indian Journal of Engineering and Material Sciences, 2013, 20: 299-309

[24] Townsend NC, Coe TE, Wilson PA, Shenoi RA. High speed marine craft motion mitigation using flexible hull design. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 42: 126-134

[25] Yang N, Das PK, Blake JIR, Sobey AJ, Shenoi RA. The application of reliability methods in the design of tophat stiffened composite panels under in-plane loading. Marine Structures, 2013, 32: 68-83

[26] Yu Z, Hu Z, Wang G. Plastic mechanism analysis of structural performances for stiffeners on bottom longitudinal web girders during a shoal grounding accident. Marine Structures, 2015, 40: 134-158

[27] Zhu S, Moan T. Nonlinear effects from wave-induced maximum vertical bending moment on a flexible ultra-large containership model in severe head and oblique seas. Marine Structures, 2014, 35: 1-25