Epistemic-based investigation of the probability of hazard scenarios using Bayesian network for the lifting operation of floating objects

Abstract

Owing to the increase in unprecedented accidents with new root causes in almost all operational areas, the importance of risk management has dramatically risen. Risk assessment, one of the most significant aspects of risk management, has a substantial impact on the system-safety level of organizations, industries, and operations. If the causes of all kinds of failure and the interactions between them are considered, effective risk assessment can be highly accurate. A combination of traditional risk assessment approaches and modern scientific probability methods can help in realizing better quantitative risk assessment methods. Most researchers face the problem of minimal field data with respect to the probability and frequency of each failure. Because of this limitation in the availability of epistemic knowledge, it is important to conduct epistemic estimations by applying the Bayesian theory for identifying plausible outcomes. In this paper, we propose an algorithm and demonstrate its application in a case study for a light-weight lifting operation in the Persian Gulf of Iran. First, we identify potential accident scenarios and present them in an event tree format. Next, excluding human error, we use the event tree to roughly estimate the prior probability of other hazard-promoting factors using a minimal amount of field data. We then use the Success Likelihood Index Method (SLIM) to calculate the probability of human error. On the basis of the proposed event tree, we use the Bayesian network of the provided scenarios to compensate for the lack of data. Finally, we determine the resulting probability of each event based on its evidence in the epistemic estimation format by building on two Bayesian network types: the probability of hazard promotion factors and the Bayesian theory. The study results indicate that despite the lack of available information on the operation of floating objects, a satisfactory result can be achieved using epistemic data.

Keywords

epistemic estimation / Bayesian theory / light-weight lifting / success likelihood index method (SLIM) / event tree (ET) / Bayesian network

References

[1] Abbassi R, Khan F, Garaniya V, Chai S, Chin C, Hossain KA. An integrated method for human error probabilityassessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities. Proccess Safety And Environmental Protection, 2015, 94: 172-179

[2] Abimbola M, Khan F, Khakzad N, Butt S. Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using bayesian network. Safety Science, 2015, 76: 133-144

[3] Basra G, Kirwan B. Collection of offshore human error probability data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1998, 61(1-2): 77-93

[4] Bouhamed H, Masmoudi A, Lecroq T, Rebaï A. Structure space of Bayesian networks is dramatically reduced by subdividing it in sub-networks. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2015, 287: 48-62

[5] Chen TT, Leu SS. Fall risk assessment of cantilever bridge projects using Bayesian network. Safety Science, 2014, 70: 161-171

[6] Comer MK, Seaver DA, Stillwell WG, Gaddy X. Generating human reliability estimates using expert judgement, 1984

[7] Embrey D. Task analysis techniques, 2000

[8] Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P, Veitch B. Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009, 87(5): 283-292

[9] Groth K, 2009). A data-informed model of performance shaping factors for use in human reliability analysis. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

[10] Helton JC, Oberkampf WL. Alternative representation of epistemic uncertainty. Reliability Engineering and System Safety (RESS), 2004, 85(1-3): 1-10

[11] Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64(2): 1925-1958

[12] Khan FI, Amyotte PR, Di Mattia DG. HEPI: A new tool for human error probability calculation for offshore operation. Safety Science, 2006, 44(4): 313-334

[13] Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliability Engineering And System Safety, 2011, 96(8): 925-932

[14] Kirwan B. Sayers B A. A comparative evaluation of five human reliability assessment techniques. human factors and decision making, 1988, 87-109

[15] Kirwan B. A Guide to practical human reliability assessment, 1994, London: Taylor & Francis

[16] Kirwan B, Kennedy R, Taylor-Adams S, AValidation A. Study of three human reliability quantification techniques, 1995, 641-661

[17] Li LF, Wang JF, Leung H, Jiang CS. Assessment of catastrophic risk using bayesian network constructed from domain knowledge and spatial data. Risk Analysis, 2010, 30(7): 1157-1175

[18] Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A. Basic principles of multi risk assessment. A case study in Italy. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62: 551-573

[19] Montewka J, Ehlers S, Goerlandt F, Hinz T, Tabri K, Kujala P. A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems—A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels. Reliability Engineering and System Saftey, 2014, 124: 142-157

[20] Musharraf M, Hassan J, Khan F, Veitch B M, Kinnon S, Imtiaz S. Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions. Safety Sience, 2013, 59: 19-27

[21] Nadim F, Liu ZQ. Quantitative risk assessment for earthquake-triggered landslides using Bayesian network. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2013

[22] Oberkampf WL, DeLand SM, Rutherford BM, Diegert KV, Alvin KF. Estimation of totaluncertainty in modeling and simulation, 2000, Albuquerque, NM: SAND 2000-0824, Sandia National Laboratories

[23] Rausand M. Risk assessment, 2011, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons

[24] Robinson RW. Counting unlabeled acyclic digraphs. Comb. Math., 1977, 622: 28-43

[25] Sentz K, Ferson S. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory, 2002

[26] Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, 1983

[27] Urbina A, Mahadevan S. Quantification of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in computational models of complex systems. Structural Dynamic, 2011, 3: 519-535

[28] Williams JC. A proposed method for assessing and reducing human error. Proceedings of the 9th Advance in Reliability Technology Symposium, 1986