Sacrificial anode stability and polarization potential variation in a ternary Al-xZn-xMg alloy in a seawater-marine environment

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of zinc (Zn) and magnesium (Mg) addition on the performance of an aluminum-based sacrificial anode in seawater were investigated using a potential measurement method. Anodic efficiency, protection efficiency, and polarized potential were the parameters used. The percentages of Zn and Mg in the anodes were varied from 2% to 8% Zn and 1% to 4% Mg. The alloys produced were tested as sacrificial anodes for the protection of mild steel in seawater at room temperature. Current efficiency as high as 88.36% was obtained in alloys containing 6% Zn and 1% Mg. The polarized potentials obtained for the coupled (steel/Al-based alloys) are as given in the Pourbaix diagrams, with steel lying within the immunity region/cathodic region and the sacrificial anodes within the anodic region. The protection offered by the sacrificial anodes to the steel after the 7th and 8th week was measured and protection efficiency values as high as 99.66% and 99.47% were achieved for the Al-6%Zn-1%Mg cast anode. The microstructures of the cast anodes comprise of intermetallic structures of hexagonal Mg₃Zn2 and body-centered cubic Al₂Mg₃Zn₃. These are probably responsible for the breakdown of the passive alumina film, thus enhancing the anode efficiency.

Keywords

sacrificial anode / anode efficiency / protection efficiency / polarized potential / intermetallic phase / alloying elements / theoretical current capacity / free electron / seawater / surface films

References

[1] Baeckmann VW, Shwenk W, Prinz W. Cathodic protection handbook: Theory and practice of electrochemical protection processes, 1997, 56

[2] Baxter D, Britton J. Offshore Cathodic Protection 101, 2006

[3] Corrosion–Doctors.org/Corrosion-Thermodynamics/Pot ential-pHdiagram-water, htm, 2009.

[4] Earnest WK. Corrosion protection for offshore pipelines, 2004, Dublin: Corrosion Conntro Technologies, 63

[5] Gabriele DF, Canterbury JD. Corrosion behaviour of Magnesium sacrificial anodes in tap water, 2003, Manchester: Corrosion and Protection Centre, 51

[6] Genesca J, Juareg J. Development and testing of galvanic anodes for cathodic protection. Contributions to Science Journal, 2007, 1(3): 331-334

[7] Gurappa J. Corrosion Prevention and Control, 1984, 69

[8] Meillier A. A review of galvanic anode cathodic protection design procedure, 2000, Telford, UK: Corrosion Control Services Limited, 43-62

[9] Metals Hand Books MHB Properties and selection; Nonferrous alloys and special–purpose material, 1990

[10] Muazu A, Yaro SA. Effects of zinc addition on the performance of Aluminium as sacrificial anode in seawater. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2011, 10(2): 185-198

[11] Shibli SMA, Archana SR, Muhammed PA. Development of nano Cerium oxide incorporated aluminium alloy sacrificial anode for marine applications. Corrosion Science, 2008, 50(8): 2232-2238

[12] Talbot DEJ, Talbot JDR. Corrosion science and technology, 1997, London: CRC Press, 27-103

[13] Unified Facilities Criteria UFC Cathodic protection, 2005, USA: Department of Defence, 34-42