Performance of marine power plant given generator, main and distribution switchboard failures

Amit Kumar , Mangey Ram

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 450 -458.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 450 -458. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-015-1335-5
Article

Performance of marine power plant given generator, main and distribution switchboard failures

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Power generation is one of the most essential functions of any plant for continuous functioning without any interruption. A marine power plant (MPP) is in the same situation. In the present paper, the authors have tried to find the various reliability characteristics of a MPP. Using a marine power plant composed of two generators in which one of them is located at the stern and another at the bow, both associated to the main switch board (MSB). The distributive switch boards (DSB) receive power from the MSB through cables and their respective junctions. Given that arrangement, a working based transition state diagram has been generated. With the help of the Markov process, a number of intro-differential equations are formed and solved by Laplace transform. Various reliability characteristics are calculated and discussed with the help of graphs.

Keywords

marine engineering / marine power plant (MPP) / Markov process / main switch board (MSB) / distributive switch boards (DSB) / sensitivity analysis / reliability theory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Amit Kumar, Mangey Ram. Performance of marine power plant given generator, main and distribution switchboard failures. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2015, 14(4): 450-458 DOI:10.1007/s11804-015-1335-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arora N, Kumar D. Availability analysis of steam and power generation systems in the thermal power plant. Microelectronics Reliability, 1997, 37(5): 795-799

[2]

Ben Elghali SE, Benbouzid MEH, Charpentier JF. Marine tidal current electric power generation technology: State of the art and current status. IEEE Conference on Electric Machines & Drives Conference, 2007, 2: 1407-1412

[3]

Bhushan M, Rengaswamy R. Comprehensive design of a sensor network for chemical plants based on various diagnosability and reliability criteria 1 Framework. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(7): 1826-1839

[4]

Eti MC, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD. Integrating reliability, availability, maintainability and supportability with risk analysis for improved operation of the Afam thermal power-station. Applied Energy, 2007, 84(2): 202-221

[5]

Hosseini SMH, Forouzbakhsh F, Rahimpoor M. Determination of the optimal installation capacity of small hydro-power plants through the use of technical, economic and reliability indices. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(15): 1948-1956

[6]

Hu G, Cai T, Chen C, Duan S. Solutions for SCADA system communication reliability in photovoltaic power plants. IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Electronics and Motion Control, 2009, 2482-2485

[7]

Kumar A, Ram M. Reliability measures improvement and sensitivity analysis of a coal handling unit for thermal power plant. International Journal of Engineering—Transactions C: Aspects, 2013, 26(9): 1059-1066

[8]

Kumar A, Yadav SP, Kumar S. Fuzzy reliability of a marine power plant using interval valued vague sets. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2006, 4(1): 71-82

[9]

Manglik M, Ram M. Behavioural analysis of a hydroelectric production power plant under reworking scheme. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53(2): 648-664

[10]

Ram M. On system reliability approaches: A brief survey. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2013, 4(2): 101-117

[11]

Ram M, Kumar A. Performance of a structure consisting a 2-Out-of-3: F Substructure under human failure. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39(11): 8383-8394

[12]

Ram M, Kumar A. Performability analysis of a system under 1-out-of-2: G scheme with perfect reworking. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2015, 37(3): 1029-1038

[13]

Ram M, Manglik M. Performance evaluation of a multi-state system covering imperfect fault coverage. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2014

[14]

Sannino A, Breder H, Nielsen EK. Reliability of collection grids for large offshore wind parks. IEEE Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, 2006, 1-6

[15]

Srinath LS. Reliability engineering, 2008, 4, New Delhi, India: East West Press

[16]

Tavner PJ, Van Bussel GJW, Spinato F. Machine and converter reliabilities in wind turbines. 3rd IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives, 2006, 127-130

[17]

Wang GJ, Zhang YL. An optimal replacement policy for a two-component series system assuming geometric process repair. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2007, 54(2): 192-202

[18]

Ye L, Wang S, Bing F, Malik OP, Zeng Y. Control/maintenance strategy fault tolerant mode and reliability analysis for hydro power stations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(3): 340-345

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

145

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/