Mechanical behavior of a glass-fiber reinforced composite to steel joint for ships

Xiaowen Li , Ping Li , Zhuang Lin , Dongmei Yang

Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 39 -45.

PDF
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 39 -45. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-015-1296-8
Article

Mechanical behavior of a glass-fiber reinforced composite to steel joint for ships

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The use of a glass-fiber reinforced composite in marine structures is becoming more common, particularly due to the potential weight savings. The mechanical response of the joint between a glass-fiber reinforced polymer (GRP) superstructure and a steel hull formed is examined and subsequently modified to improve performance through a combined program of modeling and testing. A finite-element model is developed to predict the response of the joint. The model takes into account the contact at the interface between different materials, progressive damage, large deformation theory, and a non-linear stress-strain relationship. To predict the progressive failure, the analysis combines Hashin failure criteria and maximum stress failure criteria. The results show stress response has a great influence on the strength and bearing of the joint. The Balsawood-steel interface is proved to be critical to the mechanical behavior of the joint. Good agreement between experimental results and numerical predictions is observed.

Keywords

glass-fiber reinforced composite / marine structure / mechanical behavior / steel joint / finite-element model / progressive failure / Hashin failure criteria

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaowen Li, Ping Li, Zhuang Lin, Dongmei Yang. Mechanical behavior of a glass-fiber reinforced composite to steel joint for ships. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2015, 14(1): 39-45 DOI:10.1007/s11804-015-1296-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adams RD. Strength predictions for lap joints, especially with composite adherends—A review. Journal of Adhesion, 1989, 30(1–4): 219-242

[2]

Adams RD, Atkins RW, Harris JA, Kinloch AJ. Stress analysis and failure properties of carbon fibre reinforced plastic/steel double lap joints. Journal of Adhesion, 1986, 20(1): 29-53

[3]

Anyfantis K. Adhesive bonding of dissimilar materials: Literature review, 2009

[4]

Boyd SW. Strength and durability of steel to composite joints for marine application, 2006, Southampton, UK: School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, 46-80

[5]

Campilho RDSG. Repair of composite and wood structures., 2009, Porto, Portugal: Engineering Faculty, Porto University, 24-58

[6]

Campilho RDSG, Banea MD, Pinto AMG, da Silva LFM, de Lesus AMP. Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2011, 31(5): 363-372

[7]

Cao J, Grenesdt JL. Test of a redesigned glass-fiber reinforced vinylester to steel joint for use between a naval GRP superstructure and a steel hull. Composite Structures, 2003, 60(4): 439-445

[8]

Cao J, Grenesdt JL. Design and testing of joints for composite sandwich/steel hybrid ship hulls. Composites, Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2004, 35(9): 1091-1105

[9]

Clifford SM, Manger CIC, Clyne TW. Characterisation of a glass-fiber reinforced vinylester to steel joint for use between a naval GRP superstructure and a steel hull. Composite Structures, 2002, 57(1–4): 59-66

[10]

Hart-Smith LJ. Matthews FL. Design of adhesively bonded joints. Joining Fibre Reinforced Plastics, 1986, London: Elsevier Applied Science, 271-311

[11]

Hart-Smith LJ. Adhesive bonding of composite structures—Progress to date and some remaining challenges. Journal of Composite Technology Research, 2002, 24(3): 133-153

[12]

Hayman B, Echtermeyer AT, McGeorge D. Use of composites in naval ships. Warship 2001-Future Surface Warships, London, 2001, 12-18

[13]

Hentinen M, Hildebrand M, Visuri M. Adhesively bonded joints between FRP sandwich and metal., 1997, Finland: VTT, Espoo, 8-36

[14]

Hildebrand M, Hentinen M. Efficient solutions for joints between large FRP-sandwich and metal structures. Proceedings of the 19th SAMPE Europe International Conference, Paris, France, 1998, 417-428

[15]

Kapadia A. Weight and cost comparison of base design structure to a given steel structure., 2002, Roskilde, Denmark: Materials Research Department

[16]

Kim SJ, Hwang JS, Kim JH. Progressive failure analysis of pin-loaded laminated composites using penalty finite element method. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(1): 75-80

[17]

Konstantions N. Analysis and design of composite to metal adhesively bonded joints., 2012, Athens, Greece: National Technical University of Athens, 1-208

[18]

Lessard LB, Shokrieh MM. Two-dimensional modeling of composite pinned-joint failure. Journal of Composite Material, 1995, 29(5): 671-697

[19]

Mouritz AP, Gellert E, Burchill P, Challis K. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Composite Structures, 2001, 53(1): 21-41

[20]

Smith CS. Design of marine structures in composite materials, 1990, New York, USA: Elsevier Applied Science, 32-46

[21]

Smith CS. Response of hybrid GRP/steel superstructures to blast loading—theory and experiment. Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Marine Structures, Dunfermline, Scotland, 1991, 392-415

[22]

Theotokoglou EE, Moan TJ. Experimental and numerical study of composite tee-joints. Journal of Composite Material, 1996, 30(2): 190-209

[23]

Toftegaard H, Lystrup A. Design and test of lightweight sandwich T-joint for naval ships. Composites, Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2005, 36(8): 1055-1065

[24]

Vandellos T, Huchette C, Carrère N. Proposition of a framework for the development of a cohesive zone model adapted to Carbon-Fiber reinforced plastic laminated composites. Composite Structures, 2013, 105: 199-206

[25]

Wright PNH, Wu Y, Gibson AG. Fibre reinforced composite-steel connections for transverse ship bulkheads. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2000, 29(10): 549-557

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

146

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/