Modeling the effects of tool shoulder and probe profile geometries on friction stirred aluminum welds using response surface methodology

Abstract

The present paper discusses the modeling of tool geometry effects on the friction stir aluminum welds using response surface methodology. The friction stir welding tools were designed with different shoulder and tool probe geometries based on a design matrix. The matrix for the tool designing was made for three types of tools, based on three types of probes, with three levels each for defining the shoulder surface type and probe profile geometries. Then, the effects of tool shoulder and probe geometries on friction stirred aluminum welds were experimentally investigated with respect to weld strength, weld cross section area, grain size of weld and grain size of thermo-mechanically affected zone. These effects were modeled using multiple and response surface regression analysis. The response surface regression modeling were found to be appropriate for defining the friction stir weldment characteristics.

Keywords

friction stir welding (FSW) / tool geometries / mechanical properties / microstructures / response surface / regression modeling

References

[1] Biswas P., Mandal N.R. Experimental study on friction stir welding of marine grade aluminum alloy. Journal of Ship Production, 2009, 25: 1-6

[2] Boz M., Kurt A. The influence of stirrer geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir welding process. Mater Design, 2004, 26: 343-7

[3] Dawes CJ, Thomas WM (1999). Development of improved tool designs for friction stir welding of aluminium. Proceedings of the 1st international friction stir welding symposium, Oaks, CA, USA, 14–16.

[4] Fujii H., Cui L., Maeda M., Nogi K. Effect of tool shape on mechanical and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloy. Materials science and Engineering A, 2006, 419: 25-31

[5] Leal R.M., Leitao C., Loureiro A., Rodrigues D.M., Vilac P. Material flow in heterogeneous friction stir welding of thin aluminium sheets: Effect of shoulder geometry. Materials Science and Engineering, 2008, 498: 384-391

[6] Lee W.B., Yeon Y.M., Jung S.B. Evaluation of the microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 6005 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Technol, 2003, 19: 1513-1518

[7] Mohanty H.K., Mahapatra M.M., Kumar P., Biswa P., Mandal N.R. Effect of tool shoulder and pin probe profiles on friction stirred aluminum welds — A comparative study. Journal of Marine Science Application, 2012, 11(2): 200-207

[8] Rajakumar S., Muralidharan C., Balasubramanian V. Optimization of the friction stir welding process and tool parameters to attain a maximum tensile strength of AA7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2010, 224(8): 1175-1190

[9] Sato Y.S., Urata M., Kokawa H. Parameters controlling microstructure and hardness during friction-stir welding of precipitation-hardenable aluminum alloy 6063. Metall Mater Trans A, 2002, 33: 625-35

[10] Scialpi A., Filippis L.A.C., de Cavaliere P. Influence of shoulder geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 6082 aluminium alloy. Materials and Design, 2007, 28: 1124-1129

[11] Su J.Q., Nelson T.W., Mishra R., Mahoney M.W. Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050-T651 alloy. Acta Mat., 2003, 51: 713-729

[12] Su J.Q., Nelson T.W., Mishra R.S., Mahony M. Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050-T651 aluminium. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51: 713-729

[13] Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Temple-Smith, P, Dawes, CJ (1993). Friction stir butt welding (The Welding Institute (TWI)). PCT World Patent Application WO93/10935; field: 27 November 1992(UK 9125978.8, 6 December 1991); publication: 10 June 1993.

[14] Thomas W.M., Threadgill P.L., Nicholas E.D. The feasibility of friction stir welding steel. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 1999, 4: 365-372