Design and analysis of typical buoyancy tank riser tensioner systems

Abstract

The method for design and analysis of a buoyancy tank riser tensioner system (BTRTS) was put forward in this paper, taking the free standing hybrid riser’s top buoyancy tank as an example. The design procedure was discussed and was also illustrated in a flowchart, after a short description of the global arrangement, structure configuration, and the function of different types of buoyancy tanks (BT). The objective of this paper is to describe a way of developing a BT with minimal hydro force, maximal net lift, and no redundancy of compartments. The method of determining the main dimensions of the BT, namely the length and the outer diameter, was outlined. A series of investigations was conducted for a West Africa FSHR BT design, and the effect of the ratio of the length to the outer diameter (L/D) on the hydrodynamics and the weight of the BT was discussed. The methodology of designing the internal structure of the BT was presented. The effects of the number of compartments and the dimension of the inner stem on the BT weight and strength were compared. The relationship between inner structure and the number one index of the BT as well as the riser’s top tension factor (TTF) were illustrated for normal operating conditions and conditions with one or more compartments (or inner stem) damaged. A design instance was given in this paper, when L/D is 4–6, the BT weight and the drag force are compromised. When the BT is divided into 10 compartments, the riser TTF will reach the maximum value, and the ratio of the stem OD to shell OD is about 0.3. A global strength analysis method of the BT and the main load case matrix was also included in the paper, together with the local strength analysis of the buoyancy tank’s pad-eye assembly.

Keywords

buoyancy tank (BT) / buoyancy tank riser tensioner system (BTRTS) / top tension factor (TTF) / strength analysis

References

[1] Auperin M (2005). Lessons learned from development and installation of injection single hybrid risers-application to production, test pipe-in-pipe SHRs. 2005 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 4–10.

[2] Bridge CD (2007). Hydrodynamic properties of the grouped FSHR using CFD and model tests. The Sixteenth (2007) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 2695.

[3] Djia F, Zimmermann C, de la Cruz Daniel, de Roux Grégoire, Legras Jean-Luc (2009). Design of the greater Plutonio riser tower. 28th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, 1–9.

[4] Qin H. Optimized design of ship structure, 2010, Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 15-30

[5] Roveri FE, Velten AG, Mello VC, Marques LF (2008). The Roncador P-52 oil export system-hybrid riser at a 1800m water depth. 2008 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 3–11.

[6] Song R, Stanton P, Zhou X (2010a). VIV analysis of deepwater free standing hybrid riser. 29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Shanghai, 2–4.

[7] Song R, Stanton P, Zhou X (2010b). Engineering design of deepwater free standing hybrid riser. 29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Shanghai, 2–8.

[8] Sworn A (2005). Hybrid riser towers from an operator’s perspective. 2005 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 4–7.

[9] Tellier E (2009). The evolution of free standing risers. 28th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hawaii, 6–9.

[10] Wu M (2006). The dynamics of flexible jumpers connecting a turret moored FPSO to a hybrid riser tower. D.O.T Xviii Conference, Houston, 2–6.