Comparison of the performance of two direct wave energy conversion systems: Archimedes wave swing and power buoy
Jawad Faiz , M. Ebrahimi-Salari
Journal of Marine Science and Application ›› 2011, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 419 -428.
Comparison of the performance of two direct wave energy conversion systems: Archimedes wave swing and power buoy
Many wave energy conversion devices have not been well received. The main reasons are that they are too complicated and not economical. However, in the last two decades direct conversion systems have drawn the attention of researchers to their widely distributed energy source due to their simple structure and low cost. The most well-known direct conversion systems presently in use include the Archimedes Wave Swing (AWS) and Power Buoy (PB). In this paper, these two systems were simulated in the same conditions and their behaviors were studied in different wave conditions. In order to verify the simulations, results of the generator of the finite element computations were followed. An attempt was made to determine the merits and drawbacks of each method under different wave conditions by comparing the performance of the two systems. The wave conditions suitable for each system were specified.
AWS / PB / direct wave energy conversion / PM linear generator
| [1] |
Bredmo A, Falnes J, Lillebekken PM (1995). Conversion of wave energy by twin oscillating water columns. 2nd European Wave Power Conference, Lisbon, 1–5. |
| [2] |
Budal K, Falnes J, Kyllingstad A, Oltedal G (1979). Experiments with point absorbers. 1st Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization, Gothenburg, 1–5. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Budal K, Falnes J (1982). The Norwegian wave power buoy project. 2nd Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization, Trondheim, 1–5. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Danielssonn O, Eriksson M, Leijon M (2006b). Study of a longitudinal flux permanent magnet linear generator for wave energy converters. International Journal Energy Res., 1130–1145. |
| [7] |
da Costa J, Sarmento A, Gardner F, Beirao P, Brito-Melo A (2005). Time domain model of the Archimedes Wave Swing wave energy converter. 6th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, Glasgow, 91–97. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
McCormick ME (1973). Ocean engineering wave mechanics. Wiley, London. |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Mueller MA, Baker NJ, Spooner E (2000). Electrical aspects of direct drive wave energy converter. 4th Eur. Conf. Wave Energy, Aalborg, Denmark, 235–242. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Polinder H, Gardner F, Vriesema V (2000a). Linear PM generator for wave energy conversion in the AWS. ICEM 2000, Espoo, Finland, 1–7. |
| [27] |
Polinder H, Gardner F, Vriesema B (2000b). Linear PM generator for wave energy conversion in the AWS. International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Espoo, Finland, 309–313. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Wijono HA, Nor KM (2003). Linear generator: design and simulation. National Power and Energy Conference (PECon), Bangi, Malaysia, 306–311. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |