Hydrodynamic comparison of a semi-submersible, TLP, and Spar: Numerical study in the South China Sea environment

Abstract

The South China Sea contains tremendous oil and gas resources in deepwater areas. However, one of the keys for deepwater exploration, the investigation of deepwater floating platforms, is very inadequate. In this paper, the authors studied and compared the hydrodynamics and global motion behaviors of typical deepwater platforms in the South China Sea environment. The hydrodynamic models of three main types of floating platforms, e.g. the Semi-submersible, tension leg platform (TLP), and Truss Spar, which could potentially be utilized in the South China Sea, were established by using the 3-D potential theory. Additionally, some important considerations which significantly influence the hydrodynamics were given. The RAOs in frequency domains as well as global motions in time domains under time-varying wind, random waves, and current in 100-y, 10-y, and 1-y return period environment conditions were predicted, compared, and analyzed. The results indicate that the heave and especially the pitch motion of the TLP are favorable. The heave response of the Truss Spar is perfect and comparable with that of the TLP when the peak period of random waves is low. However, the pitch motion of Truss Spar is extraordinarily larger than that of Semi-submersible and TLP.

Keywords

Semi-submersible / Spar / tension leg platform (TLP) / South China Sea / hydrodynamics

References

[1] Agarwal A., Jain A. Nonlinear coupled dynamic response of offshore Spar platforms under regular sea waves. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(4): 517-551

[2] Bhattacharyya S.K., Sreekumar S., Idichandy V.G. Coupled dynamics of SeaStar mini tension leg platform. Ocean Engineering, 2003, 30(6): 709-737

[3] Chen X.H., Ding Y., Zhang J., Liagre P., Niedzwecki J., Teigen P. Coupled dynamic analysis of a mini TLP: comparison with measurements. Ocean Engineering, 2006, 33(1): 93-117

[4] Clauss G.F., Birk L. Hydrodynamic shape optimization of large offshore structures. Applied Ocean Research, 1996, 18(4): 157-171

[5] Koo B.J., Kim M.H., Randall R.E. The effect of nonlinear multi-contact coupling with gap between risers and guide frames on global Spar motion analysis. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31(11–12): 1469-1502

[6] Li B., Ou J., Teng B. Fully coupled effects of hull, mooring and risers model in time domain based on an innovative deep draft multi-Spar. China Ocean Engineering, 2010, 24(2): 219-233

[7] Li Binbin, Ou Jinping (2010b). An effective method to predict the motion of DDMS platform with steel catenary riser. International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, 521–528.

[8] Low Y.M. Influence of the setdown of a tension leg platform on the extreme airgap response. Applied Ocean Research, 2010, 32(1): 11-19

[9] Murray J, Yang CK, Yang W (2009). An extended tension leg platform design for post-Katrina Gulf of Mexico. International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, 120–126.

[10] Newman JN (1974). Second-order, slowly-varying forces on vessels in irregular waves. Symposium on the Dynamics of Marine Vehicles and Structures in Waves, London, 182–186.

[11] Takagi M., Arai S.I. A comparison of methods for calculating the motion of a semi-submersible. Ocean Engineering, 1985, 12(1): 45-97

[12] Tao L.B., Cai S.Q. Heave motion suppression of a Spar with a heave plate. Ocean Engineering, 2004, 31(5–6): 669-692

[13] Thiagarajan K.P., Troesch A.W. Effects of appendages and small currents on the hydrodynamic heave damping of TLP columns. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 1998, 120(1): 37-42