Nonlinear analysis of flexible and steel catenary risers with internal flow and seabed interaction effects

Abstract

Flexible risers and steel catenary risers often provide unique riser solutions for today’s deepwater field development. Accurate analysis of these slender structures, in which there are high-speed HP/HT internal flows, is critical to ensure personnel and asset safety. In this study, a special global coordinate-based FEM rod model was adopted to identify and quantify the effects of internal flow and hydrostatic pressure on both flexible and deepwater steel catenary risers, with emphasis on the latter. By incorporating internal flow induced forces into the model, it was found that the internal flow contributes a new term to the effective tension expression. For flexible risers in shallow water, internal flow and hydrostatic pressure made virtually no change to effective tension by merely altering the riser wall tension. In deep water the internal pressure wielded a dominant role in governing the riser effective tension and furthering the static configuration, while the effect of inflow velocity was negligible. With respect to the riser seabed interaction, both the seabed support and friction effect were considered, with the former modeled by a nonlinear quadratic spring, allowing for a consistent derivation of the tangent stiffness matrix. The presented application examples show that the nonlinear quadratic spring is, when using the catenary solution as an initial static profile, an efficient way to model the quasi-Winkler-type elastic seabed foundation in this finite element scheme.

Keywords

flexible riser / steel catenary riser (SCR) / rod model / internal flow / effective tension / seabed interaction

References

[1] Chai Y.T., Varyani K.S. An absolute coordinate formulation for three-dimensional flexible pipe analysis. Ocean Engineering, 2006, 33: 23-58

[2] Garrett D.L. Dynamic analysis of slender rods. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1982, 104: 302-306

[3] Ghadimi R. A simple and efficient algorithm for the static and dynamic analysis of flexible marine risers. Computers and Structures, 1988, 29(4): 541-544

[4] Jason IG (2000). The dynamics of geometrically compliant mooring systems, Ph.D thesis, S.M., MIT/WHOI Joint Program.

[5] Larsen C.M. Flexible riser analysis-comparison of results from computer programs. Marine Structures, 1992, 5: 103-119

[6] Liu Y., Bergdahl L. Influence of current and seabed friction on mooring cable response-comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain analysis. Engineering Structures, 1997, 19(11): 945-953

[7] Low YM, Langley RS (2006). Dynamic analysis of a flexible hanging riser in the time and frequency domain. OMAE2006-92171, Hamburg, Germany.

[8] Patel M.H., Seyed F.B. Internal flow induced behaviour of flexible risers. Engng. Struct. (Flexible Risers-Special Issue), 1989, 11: 266-280

[9] Patel H.M., Seyed F.B. Review of flexible riser modeling and analysis techniques. Engineering Structures, 1995, 17: 293-304

[10] Paulling J.R., Webster W.C. A consistent large amplitude analysis of the coupled response of a TLP and Tendon System. Proceedings of the 5th OMAE Symposium, 1986, III: 126-133

[11] Persio Leister de Almeida Barros, Renato Pavanello, Euclides Mesquita, Celso Kazuyuki Morooka, (2009). SCR-seafloor interaction modeling with winkler, pasternak and kerr beam-on-elastic-foundation theories. OMAE2009-79459, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

[12] Ran Z. Coupled dynamic analysis of floating structures in wave and current, 2000, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University

[13] Seyed F.B., Patel M.H. Mathematics of flexible risers including pressure and internal flow effects. Marine Struct. (Flexible Riser-Special Issue), 1992, 5: 121-150

[14] Païdoussis M.P. Fluid-structure interactions, Volume 1. slender structures and axial flow, 1998, Millbrae: California Academic Press

[15] Webster W.C. Mooring induced damping. Ocean Engineering, 1995, 22: 571-591