Computational fracture analysis of an AFM-specimen under mixed mode loading conditions

Abstract

Fracture processes in ship-building structures are in many cases of a 3-D character. A finite element (FE) model of an all fracture mode (AFM) specimen was built for the study of 3-D mixed mode crack fracture behavior including modes I, II, and III. The stress intensity factors (SIFs) were calculated by the modified virtual crack closure integral (MVCCI) method, and the crack initiation angle assessment was based on a recently developed 3-D fracture criterion—the Richard criterion. It was shown that the FE model of the AFM-specimen is applicable for investigations under general mixed mode loading conditions, and the computational results of crack initiation angles are in agreement with some available experimental findings. Thus, the applicability of the FE model of the AFM-specimen for mixed mode loading conditions and the validity of the Richard criterion can be demonstrated.

Keywords

3-D crack fracture behavior / stress intensity factors (SIFs) / all fracture mode (AFM) specimen / crack initiation angle / mixed mode loading conditions

References

[1] Buchholz FG, Chergui A, Richard HA (2001). Fracture analyses and experimental results on crack growth under general mixed mode loading conditions. Advances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics II, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Milan, Italy, 451–456.

[2] Buchholz F.G., Chergui A., Richard H.A. Fracture analyses and experimental results of crack growth under general mixed mode loading conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71(4–6): 455-468

[3] Buchhloz F.G., Just V., Richard H.A. Computational simulation and experimental findings of three-dimensional fatigue crack growth in a single-edge notched specimen under torsion loading. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2005, 28: 127-134

[4] Buchholz FG, Wang H, Lin J, Richard HA (1998). 3D finite element analysis of different test specimens for investigations on mixed mode I, II and III fracture. CD-ROM Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM 98), Buenos Aires, 1–21.

[5] Davenport J.C.W., Smith D.J. A study of superimposed fracture modes I, II and III on PMMA. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 1993, 16: 1125-1133

[6] Dhondt G. A new three-dimensional fracture criterion. Key Engineering Materials, 2003, 251–252: 209-214

[7] Gdoutos E.E. Fracture mechanics criteria and application, 1990, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 195-226

[8] Hull D. The effect of mixed mode I/III on crack evolution in the brittle solids. International Journal of Fatigue, 1995, 70: 59-79

[9] Lazarus V., Leblond J.B. Crack paths under mixed mode I+II or (I+II+III) loadings. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Serie II, 1998, 326(3): 171-177

[10] Li Q., Zhu L., Zhu S., Buchholz F.G. Fracture behavior in AFM-specimen with single crack under different loading conditions. Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 2010, 158(1): 1-16

[11] Maigefeireti M., Masanori K., Mamtimin G. Comparison of experimental and numerically simulated fatigue crack propagation. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering, 2009, 3(7): 952-967

[12] Pook L.P. On fatigue crack paths. International Journal of Fatigue, 1995, 17: 5-13

[13] Richard H.A., Fulland M., Buchholz F.G., Schöllmann M. 3D fracture criteria for structures with cracks. Steel Research, 2003, 8: 491-497

[14] Richard H.A., Fulland M., Sander M. Theoretical crack path prediction. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2005, 28: 8-9

[15] Richard H.A., Kuna M. Theoretical and experimental study of superimposed fracture modes I, II and III. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1990, 35: 949-960

[16] Rybicki E.F., Kanninen M.F. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1977, 9: 931-938

[17] Schöellmann M., Richard H.A., Kullmer G., Fulland M. A new criterion for the prediction of crack development in multiaxially loaded structures. International Journal of Fatigue, 2002, 117: 129-141

[18] Schöllmann M., Richard H.A., Kullmer G., Fulland M. A new criterion for the prediction of crack development in multiaxially loaded structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2002, 117: 129-141

[19] Schöllmann M, Kullmer G, Fulland M, Richard HA (2001). A new criterion for 3D crack growth under mixed-mode (I + II + III) loading. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture, Lisboa, 589–596.

[20] Sih G.C., Cha B.C.K. A fracture criterion for three-dimensional crack problems. Journal of Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1974, 6: 699-732

[21] Sumpter J.D.G., Caudrey A.J. Recommended fracture toughness for ship hull steel and weld. Marine Structures, 1995, 8(4): 345-357