Safety management of deep water station-keeping systems

Abstract

Based on relevant in-service experience, this paper discusses how risks associated with station-keeping systems can be controlled through adequate design criteria, inspection, repair and maintenance practice, as well as quality assurance and control of the engineering processes. Particular focus must be placed on quantitative design for system robustness. The application of structural reliability analysis to quantify safety is briefly reviewed. In particular it was emphasized that reliability predictions based on normal uncertainties and variability yielded lower failure rates than those experienced for predictions of hulls and catenary mooring systems; gross errors in design, fabrication and operation were responsible. For this reason the broad safety management approach mentioned above was proposed. Moreover, it was found that this approach needed to be supported by a quantitative risk assessment. Finally, the challenges in dealing with the effects of human factors in risk management are outlined, along with means to deal with them in a qualitative manner, by the so-called barrier method to limit risk.

Keywords

safety / management / offshore / station-keeping

References

[1] Chakrabarti S. Handbook of offshore engineering[M]. Vol. 1 and 2, 2005, Amsterdam: Elsevier

[2] ISO 19900 (1991). Petroleum and natural gas industries — Offshore structures — Part 1: General requirements (1994); Part 2: Fixed steel structures(2001); Part 7: Station-keeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units. ISO 19901-7, 2005[S]. London: Int. Standardization Organization.

[3] API: API RP2T, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Tension Leg Platforms; API RP 2SK, Recommended practice for design and analysis of stationkeeping systems for floating structures, (2005)[R]. Washington DC: American Petroleum Institute.

[4] IMO Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, 1989, London: Int. Maritime Org

[5] NORSOK N-001 Structural Design, 2002, Oslo: Norwegian Technology Standards

[6] Vinnem J. E. Offshore risk assessment[M]. 1999, Doordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[7] CMPT. Dynamic Positioning, Chapter 10. In Floating structures: a guide for design and analysis, publication 101/98, The Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology, OPL[R]. Herfordshire, England, 1998.

[8] ORMBERG H, SØDAHL N, STEINKJER O. Efficient analysis of mooring systems using de-coupled and coupled analysis[C]//Proc. 17th OMAE Conf. Lisbon: Paper No. OMAE98-0351, 1998.

[9] Moan T. Safety of floating offshore platforms, keynote lecture[C]. 9th PRADS Conference, 2004, Travemünde-Lübeck: STG

[10] Moan T. Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures[J]. Journal Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2005, 1(1): 33-62

[11] NMD. Regulations for mobile platforms; Regulations concerning anchoring/positioning, 1987, Oslo: The Norwegian Maritime Directorate

[12] DNV. Offshore standard — Position mooring[R]. 2004, Oslo: DNV OS-E301

[13] Jiao G., Moan T. Probabilistic analysis of fatigue due to Gaussian load processes[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1990, 5(2): 76-83

[14] Naess A. Prediction of extremes of combined first-order and slow-drift motions of offshore structures[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 1989, 11(2): 100-110

[15] Stansberg C. T. Model scale experiments of extreme slow-drift motions in irregular waves [C]. Proc. BOSS-92 Conference, 1992, London: BPP Technical Services, Ltd, 1207-1222

[16] Melchers R. E. Structural reliability analysis and prediction[M]. 1999, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

[17] NÆSS A, MOAN T. Probabilistic design of offshore structures, Chapter 5 in [1], 2008.

[18] Moan T. Safety level across different types of structural forms and material — Implicit in codes for offshore structures, 1995, Trondheim: SINTEF

[19] MATHISEN J, HØRTE et al. DEEPMOOR — Design methods for deep water mooring systems, calibration of an ultimate, progressive failuere and fatigue limit state[R]. Oslo: DNV Reports Nos. 97-3583; 97-3581; 98-3110, 1998.

[20] MOAN T. Reliability-based fatigue design criteria for offshore structures considering the effect of inspection and repair[C]// Proc. 25th Offshore Technology Conference. Paper No. OTC 7189. Houston: 1993: 591–599.

[21] Mathisen J., Larsen K. Risk-based inspection planning for mooring chain[J]. OMAE, 2004, 126: 250-257

[22] LARDIER J, MOAN T, GAO Z. Fatigue reliability of catenary mooring lines under corrosion effect[C]// Proc. 27th OMAE Conf. Estoril, Portugal: Paper No. OMAE2008-57360, 2008.

[23] Moan T., Song R. Implications of inspection updating on system fatigue reliability of offshore structures[J]. OMAE, 1998, 122: 173-180

[24] Hovde G.O., Moan T. Fatigue reliability of TLP tether systems considering the effect of inspection and repair[C]. Proc. 7th BOSS Conf. Mass Inst. of Technology, 1994, 3: 85-100

[25] Høyland A., Rausand M. System reliability theory: models and statistical methods[M]. 1994, New York: John Wiley and Sons

[26] SIGNORET J P. Risk analysis of dynamic positioning systems. Reliability’85, 1985.

[27] FYLLING I J. Design methods for deep water anchor system[R]. Marintek, Report No. MT51 88-0260, Trondheim: 1988.

[28] API. Gulf of Mexico MODU mooring practices for the 2007 hurricane season — Interim recommendations[R]. 2007, Dallas: American Petroleum Institute

[29] IMCA. Station Keeping Incidents Report for 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005[R]// IMCA M 173, M 177, M 183 and M 186, issued during 2004 to 2007.

[30] Santa Rosa Costa M., Machado G. B. Analyzing petrobras DP incidents[C]. Dynamic Positioning Conference, 2006, Houston: Marine Technology Society

[31] Chen H., Moan T. DP incidents on mobile offshore drilling units on the Norwegian continental shelf, Kolowrocki. Advances in Safety and Reliability, Vol. 1, 2005, London: Taylor & Francis, 337-344

[32] CHEN H, MOAN T. Safety of DP drilling operations in the South China Sea, [C]// Proc. PSAM Conf. Hong Kong, 2008.

[33] NPD Guidelines for safety evaluation of platform conceptual design[R]. Stavanger: Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 1981.

[34] MOAN T. Development of accidental collapse limit state criteria for offshore structures[J]. Structural Safety, 2009 (To appear).

[35] PSA. Regulations relating to management in the petroleum activities (the Management regulations)[R]. 2001, Stavanger: Petroleum Safety Authority

[36] Work Together for Safety Forum. Report Phase 1 — Proposal to barrier concept and definitions[R]. Stavanger. Workgroup Barriers, 2004 (in Norwegian).

[37] Chen H., Verhoeven H., Moan T. Safety of dynamic positioning operations on mobile offshore drilling units[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93: 1072-1090

[38] Chen H., Moan T. Probabilistic modeling and evaluation of collision between shuttle tanker and FPSO in Tandem offloading[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004, 2: 169-186

[39] Harris D., Chaney F. Human factors in quality assurance[M]. 1969, London: John Wiley & Sons

[40] BEA R G. Design for Reliability: Human and Organisational Factors, Chapter 12 of [1], 2005.

[41] JOHANSEN T. A, FOSSEN T I, VIK B. Hardware-in-the-loop testing of DP systems.[C]// Proc. Dynamic Positioning Conference. Houston, USA, 2005.