Capacity-based performance measurements for loading equipment in open pit mines

Amin Moniri-Morad , Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad , Hamid Aghababaei , Javad Sattarvand

Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 1672 -1686.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6) : 1672 -1686. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4124-5
Article

Capacity-based performance measurements for loading equipment in open pit mines

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an integrated framework for capacity analysis to address the influence of systematic hazardous factors on the haulage fleet nominal capacity. The proposed model was made to capture unexpected risks for mining equipment based upon data-driven method considering different scenarios. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) was employed to quantify the loss of production capacity by focusing on severity of failure incidents and maintainability measurements. Discrete-event simulation was configured to characterize the nominal capacity for mining operation. Accordingly, the system capacity was analyzed through the comparison of nominal and actual capacity. A case study was completed to validate the research methodology. The past operation and maintenance field data were collected for shovel operation. The discrete-event simulation was developed to estimate the rate of shovel nominal capacity. Then, the effects of undesirable scenarios were assessed by developing the PRA approach. The research results provide significant insights into how to enhance the production capacity in mines. The analyst gets a well judgment for the crucial elements dealing with high risk levels. A holistic maintenance plan can be developed to mitigate and control the losses.

Keywords

capacity / performance / maintainability / mining equipment / risk assessment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Amin Moniri-Morad, Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, Hamid Aghababaei, Javad Sattarvand. Capacity-based performance measurements for loading equipment in open pit mines. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(6): 1672-1686 DOI:10.1007/s11771-019-4124-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WolstenholmeE, CoyleR. Modelling discrete events in system dynamics models: A case study [J]. Dynamica, 1980, 6: 21-28

[2]

SontaminoP, DrebenstedtCA prototype dynamics model for finding an optimum truck and shovel of a new surface lignite mining in Thailand [C]// Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Continuous Surface Mining, 2015, Aachen, Springer: 493501

[3]

BarabadiA, BarabadyJ, MarkesetT. A methodology for throughput capacity analysis of a production facility considering environment condition [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96: 1637-1646

[4]

Md-NorZ, KecojevicV, KomljenovicD, GrovesW. Risk assessment for loader-and dozer-related fatal incidents in US mining [J]. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2008, 15: 65-75

[5]

PaithankarA. Hazard identification and risk analysis in mining industry [D]. Rourkela: National Institute of Technology, 2011

[6]

RuffT, ColemanP, MartiniL. Machine-related injuries in the US mining industry and priorities for safety research [J]. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2011, 18: 11-20

[7]

RoyS, BhattacharyyaM, NaikanV. Maintainability and reliability analysis of a fleet of shovels [J]. Mining Technology, 2001, 110: 163-171

[8]

SamantaB, SarkarB, MukherjeeS. Reliability analysis of shovel machines used in an open cast coal mine [J]. Mineral Resources Engineering, 2001, 10: 219-231

[9]

PatnayakS, TannantD, ParsonsI, Del ValleV, WongJ. Operator and dipper tooth influence on electric shovel performance during oil sands mining [J]. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2008, 22: 120-45

[10]

KoenigsbergE. Cyclic queues [J]. The Journal of the Operational Research Society (OR), 1958, 1: 22-35

[11]

AdanI, ResingJQueueing theory [M], 2002, Eindhoven, University of Technology Eindhoven

[12]

AllenT T. Introduction to discrete event simulation and agent-based modeling: Voting systems. health care, military, and manufacturing [M]. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2011

[13]

BrailsfordS, HiltonNA comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems, 2001

[14]

TaCH, IngolfssonA, DoucetteJ. A linear model for surface mining haul truck allocation incorporating shovel idle probabilities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 231: 770-778

[15]

National Research Council Staff.Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process [M], 1984

[16]

ModarresMRisk analysis in engineering: Techniques, tools, and trends [M], 2006, Boca Raton, CRC Press

[17]

DhillonB SMaintainability, maintenance, and reliability for engineers [M], 2006, Boca Raton, CRC Press

[18]

ModarresM, KaminskiyM P, KrivtsovVReliability engineering and risk analysis: A practical guide [M], 2016, Boca Raton, CRC Press

[19]

StamatelatosM, DezfuliH, ApostolakisG, EverlineC, GuarroS, MathiasD, MoslehA, PaulosT, RihaD, SmithCProbabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners [R], 2011, Washington DC, NASA

[20]

BariR, BuslikA, ChoN E-, BassioniA, FragolaJ, HallR E, LlbergD, LofgrenE O, BrienJ, PapazoglouI AProbabilistic safety analysis procedures guide [R], 1985

[21]

Salehpour-OskoueiF, Pourgol-MohammadM. Fault diagnosis improvement using dynamic fault model in optimal sensor placement: A case study of steam turbine [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 33(3): 531-541

[22]

ParticipantsOOREDA offshore reliability data handbook [M], 2002, Trondhim, Norway, DNV

[23]

US Department of Defense. MIL-HDBK-217F.Reliability prediction of electronic equipment [M], 1995, Washington DC, US Department of Defense

[24]

Quanterion Solution Incorporated.Nonelectronic parts reliability data (NPRD95) [M], 1995, Utica, NY, USA, Quanterion Solution Incorporated

[25]

MeyerM A, BookerJ MEliciting and analyzing expert judgment: a practical guide [M], 2001, Philadelphia, SIAM

[26]

KececiogluDReliability engineering handbook [M], 1991, New Jersey, Prentice Hall

[27]

MartzH, WallerRBayesian reliability analysis [M], 1982, New York, John Wiley & Sons

[28]

KVALOY J T, LINDQVIST B. An area based test for trend in repairable systems data [EB/OL] [2016-02-11] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-Area-Based-Test-for-Trend-in-Repairable-Systems-Kval-Lindqvist/6bd5185745b7315e3a8d6c647584454a4bf5c85c.

[29]

NelsonW BRecurrent events data analysis for product repairs, disease recurrences, and other applications [M], 2003, Philadelphia, ASA/SIAM

[30]

MoradA M, Pourgol-MohammadM, SattarvandJ. Application of reliability-centered maintenance for productivity improvement of open pit mining equipment: Case study of sungun copper mine [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21: 2372-2382

[31]

LeemisL MReliability: probabilistic models and statistical methods [M], 1995

[32]

LouitD M, PascualR, JardineA K S. A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94: 1618-1628

[33]

MasseyF JJr. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1951, 46: 68-78

[34]

BirnbaumZ WOn the importance of different components in a multicomponent system [M], 1968, Washington DC, University of Washington, Laboratory of Statistical Research

[35]

FussellJ. How to hand-calculate system reliability and safety characteristics [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1975, 3: 169-174

[36]

VeselyW, DavisT, DenningR, SaltosNMeasures of risk importance and their applications [R], 1983, Washington DC, Division of Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[37]

ChadwellG B, LeverenzF L. Importance measures for prioritization of mechanical integrity and risk reduction activities [R]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1999

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

141

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/