Sensitivity analysis of geomechanical parameters affecting a wellbore stability

Abstract

Wellbore stability analysis is a growing concern in oil industries. There are many parameters affecting the stability of a wellbore including geomechanical properties (e.g., elastic modulus, uni-axial compressive strength (UCS) and cohesion) and acting forces (e.g., field stresses and mud pressure). Accurate determination of these parameters is time-consuming, expensive and sometimes even impossible. This work offers a systematic sensitivity analysis to quantify the amount of each parameter’s effect on the stability of a wellbore. Maximum wellbore wall displacement is used as a stability factor to study the stability of a wellbore. A 3D finite difference method with Mohr model is used for the numerical modeling. The numerical model is verified against an analytical solution. A dimensionless sensitivity factor is developed in order to compare the results of various parameters in the sensitivity analysis. The results show a different order of importance of parameters based on rock strength. The most sensitive properties for a weak rock are the maximum horizontal stress, internal friction angle and formation pressure, respectively, while for a strong rock, the most sensitive parameters are the maximum horizontal stress, mud pressure and pore pressure, respectively. The amount of error in wellbore stability analysis inflicted by the error in estimation of each parameter was also derived.

Keywords

wellbore stability / sensitivity analysis / numerical modeling

References

[1] YanC, DengJ, ChengY, LiM, FengY, LiX. Mechanical properties of gas shale during drilling operations [J]. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2017, 50: 1753-1765

[2] TabatabaeeM S, NikolaevN I, ChudinovaI V. Geomechanical analysis of Wellbore stability in high-pressure, high-temperature formations [C]. 79th EAGE Conf Exhib 2017, 2017, Paris, EAGE

[3] TangZ, LiQ, YinH. The influence of solute concentration and temperature of drilling fluids on wellbore failure in tight formation [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2018, 160: 276-284

[4] ChernyS, ChirkovD, LapinV, MuranovA, BannikovD, MillerM, WillbergD, MedvedevO, AlekseenkoO. Two-dimensional modeling of the near-wellbore fracture tortuosity effect [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2009, 46: 992-1000

[5] MansourizadehM, JamshidianM, BazarganP, MohammadzadehO. Wellbore stability analysis and breakout pressure prediction in vertical and deviated boreholes using failure criteria-A case study [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2016, 145: 482-492

[6] GeorgeR C, DenooS AMechanical properties program using borehole analysis and Mohr’s circle [C], 1981212219

[7] LuY L, ElsworthD, WangL G. Microcrack-based coupled damage and flow modeling of fracturing evolution in permeable brittle rocks [J]. Comput Geotech, 2013, 49: 226-244

[8] YilmazO, UnluT. Three dimensional numerical rock damage analysis under blasting load [J]. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol, 2013, 38: 266-278

[9] CaennR, DarleyH C, GrayG RComposition and properties of drilling and completion fluids [M], 2011

[10] ZeynaliM E. Mechanical and physico-chemical aspects of wellbore stability during drilling operations [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2012, 82–83: 120-124

[11] ChenGA study of wellbore stability in shales including porelastic, chemical and thermal effects [D], 2001

[12] MaT S, ChenP. A wellbore stability analysis model with chemical mechanical coupling for shale gas reservoirs [J]. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2015, 26: 72-98

[13] YueY, ChenS, WangZ, YangX, PengY, CaiJ, Nasr-el-dinH A. Improving wellbore stability of shale by adjusting its wettability [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2017, 161(2): 692-702

[14] ZhaoC, SchaubsP, HobbsB. Effects of porosity heterogeneity on chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated rocks [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24: 720-725

[15] KadyrovT, TutuncuA N. Integrated Wellbore stability analysis for well trajectory optimization and field development in the West Kazakhstan Field [C]. 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 201216261638

[16] DuttaD J, FaroukM. Wellbore stability and trajectory sensitivity analyses help safe drilling of the first horizontal well in Asl formation, Gulf of Suez, Egypt [C]. IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 2008168177

[17] RahmanM, HossainM, RahmanS. Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: Roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2000, 27: 129-149

[18] ZhangW, LiuY. Investigation of incremental fatigue crack growth mechanisms using in situ SEM testing [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 42: 14-23

[19] MaT, ChenP, YangC, ZhaoJ. Wellbore stability analysis and well path optimization based on the breakout width model and Mogi-Coulomb criterion [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2015, 135: 678-701

[20] UdegbunamJ E, AadnØyB S, FjeldeK K. Uncertainty evaluation of wellbore stability model predictions [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2014, 124: 254-263

[21] AbdollahipourA, RahmannejadR. Sensitivity analysis of influencing parameters in cavern stability [J]. Int J Min Sci Technol, 2012, 22: 707-710

[22] RutqvistJ, TsangC F, StephanssonO. Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2000, 37: 107-20

[23] LopezJ L, RappoldP M, UguetoG A, WieseneckJ B, VuKIntegrated shared earth model: 3D pore-pressure prediction and uncertainty analysis [J], 20045259

[24] GholamiR, RabieiM, RasouliV, AadnoyB, FakhariN. Application of quantitative risk assessment in wellbore stability analysis [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2015, 135: 185-200

[25] ZhangL, YanX, YangX, TianZ, YangH. Failure probability analysis of coal crushing induced by uncertainty of influential parameters under condition of in-situ reservoir [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21: 2487-2493

[26] SunZ, ZhangD. Back analysis for soil slope based on measuring inclination data [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 3291-3297

[27] HuQ, LiY-g, LÜX-lin. Practical elasto-plastic damage model for dynamic loading and nonlinear analysis of Koyna concrete dam [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20: 2586-2591

[28] LuoW, LiW. Reliability analysis of supporting pressure in tunnels based on three-dimensional failure mechanism [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23: 1243-1252

[29] HeltonJ C, DavisF J. Illustration of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis [J]. Risk Anal, 2002, 22: 591-622

[30] NikadatN, FatehiM M, AbdollahipourA. Numerical modelling of stress analysis around rectangular tunnels with large discontinuities (fault) by a hybridized indirect BEM[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(11): 4291-4299

[31] YuW, LuoZ, JavadpourF, VaraveiA, SepehrnooriK. Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale gas reservoirs [J]. J Pet Sci Eng, 2014, 113: 1-7

[32] NiuS, JingH, HuK, YangD. Numerical investigation on the sensitivity of jointed rock mass strength to various factors [J]. Min Sci Technol, 2010, 20: 530-534

[33] WangJ G, WangZ, LiY. A method for evaluating dynamic tensile damage of rock [J]. Eng Fract Mech, 2008, 75: 2812-2825

[34] ShiJ, LuaJ, ChenL, ChoppD, SukumarN. X-FEM for Abaqus (XFA) toolkit for automated crack onset and growth simulation: New development, validation, and demonstration [C]. Proc 2009 SIMULIA Cust Conf., 2009115

[35] LiuJ F, QiT Y, WuZ R. Analysis of ground movement due to metro station driven with enlarging shield tunnels under building and its parameter sensitivity analysis [J]. Tunneling Undergr Sp Technol, 2012, 2: 287-296

[36] Castro-filgueiraU, AlejanoL R, ArzÚaJ, IvarsD M. Sensitivity analysis of the micro-parameters used in a PFC analysis towards the mechanical properties of rocks [J]. Procedia Eng, 2017, 191: 488-495

[37] DouH, ZhangH, YaoS, ZhuD, SunT, MaS. Measurement and evaluation of the stress sensitivity in tight reservoirs [J]. Pet Explor Dev, 2016, 43: 1116-1123

[38] ZhuW, ZhaoJStability analysis and modelling of underground excavations in fractured rocks [M], 2004, Amesterdam, Elsevier

[39] SaltelliA, RattoM, AndresT, CampolongoF, CariboniJ, GatelliD, SaisanaM, TarantolaSGlobal Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer [M], 2008

[40] AbdollahipourA, RahmannejadR. Investigating the effects of lateral stress to vertical stress ratios and caverns shape on the cavern stability and sidewall displacements [J]. Arab J Geosci, 2012, 6(12): 4811-4819

[41] SalenÇonJ. Contraction quasi-statique d’une cavite a symetrie spherique ou cylindrique dans un milieu elastoplastique [J]. Ann Des Ponts Chaussées, 1969, 4: 231-236