Adsorption structures of frothers at gas-liquid interface using DFT method

Yi-bing Zhang , Jian-hua Chen , Yu-qiong Li , Pei-xin Zhang

Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 536 -549.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 536 -549. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4025-7
Article

Adsorption structures of frothers at gas-liquid interface using DFT method

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) simulation was performed to investigate the adsorption mechanisms between frothers and gas-liquid interface. In water phase, the polar head group of the frother molecule was connected with water molecules by hydrogen bonding, while the non-polar group showed that hydrophobic property and water molecules around it were repelled away. The adsorption of water molecules on single frother molecule suggests that the complexes of α-terpineol-7H2O, MIBC-7H2O and DF200-13H2O reach their stable structure. The hydration shell affects both the polar head group and the non-polar group. The liquid film drainage rate of DF200 is the lowest, while α-terpineol and MIBC are almost the same. The adsorption layer of frother molecules adsorbed at the gas-liquid interface reveals that the α-terpineol molecules are more neatly arranged and better distributed. The DF200 molecules are arranged much more loosely than MIBC molecules. These results suggest that the α-terpineol molecule layer could better block the diffusion of gas through the liquid film than DF200 and MIBC. The simulation results indicate that the foam stability of α-terpineol is the best, followed by DF200 and MIBC.

Keywords

frother / water phase / gas-liquid interface / foaming / DFT

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yi-bing Zhang, Jian-hua Chen, Yu-qiong Li, Pei-xin Zhang. Adsorption structures of frothers at gas-liquid interface using DFT method. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(3): 536-549 DOI:10.1007/s11771-019-4025-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

TanY H, FinchJ A. Frother structure-property relationship: Aliphatic alcohols and bubblerise velocity [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 96–97: 33-38

[2]

KrachtaW, HuntC. Indirect measurement of frother concentration based on l-CCC curves [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2016, 92: 110-113

[3]

KowalczukP B, MroczkoD, DrzymalaJ. Influence of frother type and dose on collectorless flotation of copper-bearing shale in a flotation column [J]. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 2015, 51(2): 547-558

[4]

PhanC M, NakaharaH, ShibataO, MoroiY, NguyenC V, ChaudharyD. Surface potential of MIBC at air/water interface: A molecular dynamics study [J]. e-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology, 2012, 10: 437-440

[5]

XingaY W, GuidX H, CaobY J, WangaY W, XuaM D, WangaD Y, LiaC W. Effect of compound collector and blending frother on froth stability and flotation performance of oxidized coal [J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 305: 166-173

[6]

YianatosaJ, VinnettaL, CarrascoaC, Alvarez-silvaaM. Effect of entrainment in bubble load measurement on froth recovery estimation at industrial scale [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 72: 31-35

[7]

RamosO, CastroS, LaskowskiJ S. Copper-molybdenum ores flotation in sea water: Floatability and frothability [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 53: 108-112

[8]

ParkH, WangJ-y, WangL-guang. A comparative study of methyl cyclohexanemethanol and methyl isobutyl carbinol as frother for coal flotation [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2016, 10: 32-44

[9]

WangD-zuoFlotation reagents: Applied surface chemistry on minerals flotation and energy resources beneficiation [M], 2016, Singapore, Springer

[10]

ChenJ-h, LanL-h, ChenYe. Computational simulation of adsorption and thermodynamic study of xanthate, dithiophosphate and dithiocarbamate on galena and pyrite surfaces [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 46–47: 136-143

[11]

LiY-q, ChenJ-h, LanL-h, GuoJin. Adsorption of O2 on pyrite and galena surfaces [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2012, 22(4): 1184-1193(in Chinese)

[12]

ZhaoC-h, ChenJ-h, LongX-h, GuoJin. Study of H2O adsorption on sulfides surfaces and thermokinetic analysis [J]. Journal of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 2014, 20(2): 605-609

[13]

ChenJ-h, LongX-h, ChenYe. Comparison of multilayer water adsorption on the hydrophobic galena (PbS) and hydrophilic pyrite (FeS2) surfaces: A DFT study [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118(22): 11657-11665

[14]

ChenM-l, WangZ-w, WangH-j, ZhangG-x, TaoF-ming. Investigation of adsorption of surfactant at the gas-liquid interface with quantum chemistry method [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(11): 1451-1455 in Chinese)

[15]

TumaC, BoeseA D, HandyC N. Predicting the binding energies of H-bonded complexes: A comparative DFT study [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 1999, 1(17): 3939-3947

[16]

ShishkinO V, GorbL, LeszczybskiJ. Does the hydrated cytosine molecule retain the canonical structure? A DFT study [J]. Journal Physical Chemistry B, 2000, 104(22): 5357-5361

[17]

HuangD-w, ZhaoC-h, ChenJ-h, LiY-q, LiW-zhou. First-principle study of electronic structure and optical properties of Au-doped VO2 [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(2): 270-275

[18]

ChenYang. Measurement techniques of foam performance and influence factors of foam stability [J]. China Ming Magazine, 2014, 23(S2): 230-233(in Chinese)

[19]

DevriesA J. A fundamental investigation of the factors controlling the stability of foams [J]. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 1958, 31(5): 1142-1205

[20]

ZhaoL-mei. The foaming properties of common frother [J]. Sciencepaper Online, 2010, 5(6): 419-422(in Chinese)

[21]

DengL-jun. Effect of surface tension on bubble size in frother solutions [J]. China Science Paper, 2012, 9(12): 1340-1343(in Chinese)

[22]

GuY-ling. A new method of testing frother performance [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(9): 2776-2780

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

190

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/