An anisotropic constitutive model of geomaterials based on true triaxial testing and its application

Abstract

Series of testing on coarse grained soils were carried out with a true triaxial testing apparatus. The loads were applied from the major principal and minor principal directions, respectively, to simulate the construction and water impounding process of a rock fill dam. The stress and strain relationships induced by the different loading methods were investigated. A remarkable stress-induced anisotropy under complex stress state was observed. Contrary to popular assumptions in traditional numerical analysis and constitutive models, it was found that different elastic modulus and Poisson ratio exist in different principal directions in rock fill dams. From the testing results, an anisotropic constitutive model based on Duncan-Chang nonlinear model is presented to overcome the limitations of axi-symmetric assumptions in conventional triaxial experiments and constitutive models. Both models were then applied in FEM analysis of an under-construction earth core high rock soil filled dam with the focus on hydraulic fracturing. The study reveals the major biases that exist when numerical analysis and constitutive models do not give serious consideration to the intermediate principal stress and anisotropy effects in soil rock built structures.

Keywords

true triaxial test / stress induced anisotropy / constitutive model / complex stress state / finite element method (FEM)

References

[1] IsmailM A, JoerH A, SimW H, RandolphM F. Effect of cement type on shear behaviour of cemented calcareous soil [J]. J Geotech Eng ASCE, 2002, 128(6): 520-529

[2] MaS K, HuangM S, HuP. Soil-water characteristics and shear strength in constant water content triaxial tests on Yunnan red clay [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(5): 1412-1419

[3] CasagrandeA, CarilloN. Shear failure of anisotropic materials [J]. J Boston Soc Civ Eng, 1944, 31(4): 74-87

[4] ArthurJ R F, MenziesB K. Inherent anisotropy in a sand [J]. Geotechnique, 1972, 22(1): 115-128

[5] ArthurJ R F, ChuaK S, DunstanT. Induced anisotropy in a sand [J]. Geothchnique, 1977, 27(1): 13-30

[6] SushilK, ChaudharyJ K. Effects of initial fabric and shearing direction on cyclic deformation characterstics of sands [J]. Soils and foundations, 2002, 42(1): 147-157

[7] J Eng Mech, 2003, 29(2

[8] OdaM. Initial fabrics and their relations to mechanical properties of granular materials [J]. Soils Found, 1972, 121): 17-36

[9] ArthurR F, ChuaK S, DunstanT, RodriguezD, CaminoJ I. Principal stress rotation: A missing parameter [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1980419433

[10] AtkinsonJ H, RichardsonD, StallebrassS E. Effect of recent stress history on the stiffness of overconsolidated soil [J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(4): 531-541

[11] KirkgardM M, LadeP V. Anisotropic Three-Dimensional Behavior of a normally consolidated clay [J]. Canadian Geotech., 1993, 30: 848-858

[12] CallistoL, CalabresiG. Mechanical Behaviour of a Natural Soft Clay [J]. Geotechnique, 1998, 4(4): 495-513

[13] LiX S, DafaliasY F. Constitutive modeling of inherently anisotropic sand behavior [J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2002, 128(10): 868-880

[14] LadeP V, AbelevA V. Characterization of cross-anisotropic soil deposits from isotropic compression tests [J]. Soils Found, 2005, 45(5): 89-102

[15] AbelevA V, GuttaS K, LadeP V, YamamuroJ A. Modelling cross anisotropy in granular materials [J]. J Eng Mech, 2007, 133(8): 919-932

[16] ZhangY, XuW-y, GuJ-j, WangWei. Triaxial creep tests of weak sandstone from fracture zone of high dam foundation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(9): 2528-2536

[17] YinZ-ze. The effect of soil lateral dilation behavior on stress and strain of earth and rock-fill dams [J]. Chinese Journal of hydraulic Engineering, 2000, 44(7): 1-9

[18] YinZ-z, ZhangK-y, ZhuJ-gao. Computation for stress and deformation of concrete slab in rock-fill dam in consideration of soil anisotropy [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 48(11): 49-54

[19] ShiW-c, ZhuJ-g, ZhaoZ-hui. Strength and deformation behaviour of coarse-grained soil by true triaxial tests [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2010, 17(3): 1095-1102

[20] LeeK M, RoweR K. Deformations caused by surface loading and tunnelling: The role of elastic anisotropy [J]. Geotechnique, 1989, 39(1): 125-140

[21] SimpsonB, AtkinsonJ H, JovicicV. The influence of anisotropy on calculation of ground settlements above tunnels [J]. Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 1996591595

[22] SiddiqueeM S A, TanakaT, TatsuokaF, TaniK, MorimotoT. Numerical simulation of bearing capacity characteristics of strip footing on sand [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(4): 93-109

[23] StureS, DesaiC S. Fluid cushion truly triaxial or multiaxial testing device [J]. ASTM, Geotech Testing J, 1979, 2(1): 20-33

[24] SoroushA, AraeiA A. Analysis of behaviour of a high rockfill dam [J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 159: 49-59

[25] ChoiC H, PedroA, MichaelD H. Development of a true triaxial apparatus for sands and gravels [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2008, 31(1): 32-44

[26] GhanbariA, Shams RadS. Development of an empirical criterion for predicting the hydraulic fracturing in the core of earth dams [J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2015

[27] DuncanJ M, ChangC Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils [J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1970, 96: 1629-1653

[28] KulhawyF H, DuncanJ M. Stresses and movements in oroville dam [J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1972, 98(SM7): 653-665