Travel modal choice analysis for traffic corridors based on decision-theoretic approaches

Wei Guo , Yi Zhang , Jia-xuan You , Jian-ming Hu , Xin Pei

Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 3028 -3039.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 3028 -3039. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-016-3366-8
Geological, Civil, Energy and Traffic Engineering

Travel modal choice analysis for traffic corridors based on decision-theoretic approaches

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The rapid development of multimodal transportation system prompts travellers to choose multiple transportation modes, such as private vehicles or taxi, transit (subways or buses), or park-and-ride combinations for urban trips. Traffic corridor is a major scenario that supports travellers to commute from suburban residential areas to central working areas. Studying their modal choice behaviour is receiving more and more interests. On one hand, it will guide the travellers to rationally choose their most economic and beneficial mode for urban trips. On the other hand, it will help traffic operators to make more appropriate policies to enhance the share of public transit in order to alleviate the traffic congestion and produce more economic and social benefits. To analyze the travel modal choice, a generalized cost model for three typical modes is first established to evaluate each different travel alternative. Then, random utility theory (RUT) and decision field theory (DFT) are introduced to describe the decision-making process how travellers make their mode choices. Further, some important factors that may influence the modal choice behaviour are discussed as well. To test the feasibility of the proposed model, a field test in Beijing was conducted to collect the real-time data and estimate the model parameters. The improvements in the test results and analysis show new advances in the development of travel mode choice on multimodal transportation networks.

Keywords

modal choice analysis / traffic corridor modelling / decision field theory

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wei Guo, Yi Zhang, Jia-xuan You, Jian-ming Hu, Xin Pei. Travel modal choice analysis for traffic corridors based on decision-theoretic approaches. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(11): 3028-3039 DOI:10.1007/s11771-016-3366-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

VerplankenB, AartsH, VAN KnippenbergA. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices [J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1997, 27(5): 539-560

[2]

van SchijndelW J, DinwoodieJ. Congestion and multimodal transport: a survey of cargo transport operators in the Netherlands [J]. Transport Policy, 2000, 7(4): 231-241

[3]

RehrlK, BruntschS, MentzH J. Assisting multimodal travelers: Design and prototypical implementation of a personal travel companion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2007, 8(1): 31-42

[4]

MeschiniL, GentileG, PapolaN. A frequency based transit model for dynamic traffic assignment to multimodal networks [C]. Proceedings of 17th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. London: Elsevier, 2007

[5]

ZiliaskopoulosA, WardellW. An intermodal optimum path algorithm for multimodal networks with dynamic arc travel times and switching delays [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 125(3): 486-502

[6]

BhatC R. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1995, 29(6): 471-483

[7]

BhatC R. Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1997, 31(1): 41-54

[8]

QianZ S, ZhangH M. Modeling multi-modal morning commute in a one-to-one corridor network [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(2): 254-269

[9]

van NesRDesign of multimodal transport networks: A hierarchical approach [M], 2002

[10]

BanomyongR, BeresfordA, KC. Multimodal transport: The case of Laotian garment exporters [J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2001, 31(9): 663-685

[11]

LoH K, YipC W, WanQ K. Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services: A nested logit approach [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2004, 12(3): 251-272

[12]

MahmassaniH S, LiuY H. Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveller information systems [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1999, 7(2): 91-107

[13]

ZiliaskopoulosA, WardellW. An intermodal optimum path algorithm for multimodal networks with dynamic arc travel times and switching delays [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 125(3): 486-502

[14]

CascettaETransportation systems analysis: Models and applications [M], 2009New YorkSpringer

[15]

WilsonA G, CoelhoJ D, MacgillS M, WilliamsH COptimisation in locational and transport analysis [M], 1981New YorkWiley

[16]

CantarellaG E, DE LucaS. Multilayer feedforward networks for transportation mode choice analysis: An analysis and a comparison with random utility models [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2005, 13(2): 121-155

[17]

BusemeyerJ R, TownsendJ T. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment [J]. Psychological Review, 1993, 100(3): 432-459

[18]

WuJ, SunH, WangD Z W, ZhangM, HanL, GaoZ. Bounded-rationality based day-to-day evolution model for travel behavior analysis of urban railway network [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 31: 73-82

[19]

ZhaoH, YanX, GaoZ. Transportation serviceability analysis for metropolitan commuting corridors based on modal choice modelling [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013, 49: 270-284

[20]

WangR. Autos, transit and bicycles: Comparing the costs in large Chinese cities [J]. Transport policy, 2011, 18(1): 139-146

[21]

ZhengY, GuoW, ZhangY, HuJ. A generalized comfort function of subway systems based on a nested logit model [J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2014, 19(3): 300-306

[22]

MonginPExpected utility theory, 1997CheltenhamEdward Elgar Publishing342-350

[23]

QinH, GuanH, WuY J. Analysis of park-and-ride decision behavior based on decision field theory [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2013, 18: 199-212

[24]

BusemeyerJ R, JohnsonJ GMicro-process models of decision making [M], 2008CambridgeHandbook of Computational Psychology

[25]

RoeR M, BusemeyerJ R, TownsendJ T. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making [J]. Psychological Review, 2001, 108(2): 370-392

[26]

BusemeyerJ R, DiederichA. Survey of decision field theory [J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2002, 43(3): 345-370

[27]

BusemeyerJ R, JohnsonJ GComputational models of decision making [M], 2004133-154

[28]

DuanK, LiJ Y. The application of decision field theory in clothing style evaluation [J]. Journal of Donghua University: Natural Science, 2010, 36(2): 175-178

[29]

GoodmanC J, MurataS. Metro traffic regulation from the passenger perspective [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2001, 215(2): 137-147

[30]

LamT C, SmallK A. The value of time and reliability: Measurement from a value pricing experiment [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2001, 37(2): 231-251

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

96

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/