Evaluation of survival stow position and stability analysis for heliostat under strong wind

Abstract

Heliostats are sensitive to the wind load, thus as a key indicator, the study on the static and dynamic stability bearing capacity for heliostats is very important. In this work, a numerical wind tunnel was established to calculate the wind load coefficients in various survival stow positions. In order to explore the best survival stow position for the heliostat under the strong wind, eigenvalue buckling analysis method was introduced to predict the critical wind load theoretically. Considering the impact of the nonlinearity and initial geometrical imperfection, the nonlinear post-buckling behaviors of the heliostat were investigated by load-displacement curves in the full equilibrium process. Eventually, combining B-R criterion with equivalent displacement principle the dynamic critical wind speed and load amplitude coefficient were evaluated. The results show that the determination for the best survival stow position is too hasty just by the wind load coefficients. The geometric nonlinearity has a great effect on the stability bearing capacity of the heliostat, while the effects of the material nonlinearity and initial geometrical imperfection are relatively small. And the heliostat is insensitive to the initial geometrical imperfection. In addition, the heliostat has the highest safety factor for wind-resistant performance in the stow position of 90-90 which can be taken as the best survival stow position. In this case, the extreme survival wind speeds for the static and dynamic stability are 150 m/s and 36 m/s, respectively.

Keywords

heliostat / survival stow position / stability bearing capacity / strong wind

References

[1] KolbG J, JonesS A, DonnellyM W, GormanD, ThomasR, DavenportR, LumiaRHeliostat cost reduction study[R], 2007New MexicoSandia National Laboratories

[2] CoventryJ, PyeJPitchumaniR. Heliostat cost reduction-where to now? [C]. Energy Procedia. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier Science BV, 201360-70

[3] YellowhairJ, AndrakaC EPitchumaniR. Evaluation of advanced heliostat reflective facets on cost and performance [C]. Energy Procedia, 2013Amsterdam, NetherlandElsevier Science BV265-274

[4] SunH-h, GongB, YaoQiang. A review of wind loads on heliostat and trough collectors [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 32: 206-221

[5] PeterkaJ A, HosoyaN, BienkiewiczB, CermakJ EWind load reduction for heliostats, 1986ColoradoColorado State University

[6] PeterkaJ A, TanZ, BienkiewiczB, CermakJ EMean and peak wind load reduction on heliostats, 1987ColoradoColorado State University

[7] PeterkaJ A, TanZ, BienkiewiczB, CermakJ EWind loads on heliostats and parabolic dish collectors, 1988ColoradoColorado State University

[8] PfahlA, UhlemannH. Wind loads on heliostats and photovoltaic trackers at various Reynolds numbers [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99: 964-968

[9] PfahlA, BuselmeierM, ZaschkeM. Wind loads on heliostats and photovoltaic trackers of various aspect ratios [J]. Solar Energy, 2011, 85: 2185-2201

[10] PfahlA, BrucksA, HolzeCPitchumaniR. Wind load reduction for light-weight heliostats [C]. Energy Procedia, 2013Amsterdam, NetherlandElsevier Science BV193-200

[11] GongB, WangZ-f, LiZ-n, ZangC-c, WuZ-yong. Fluctuating wind pressure characteristics of heliostats [J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 50: 307-316

[12] GongB, LiZ-n, WangZ-f, WangY-ge. Wind-induced dynamic response of heliostat [J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 38: 206-213

[13] ZangC-c, GongB, WangZ-feng. Experimental and theoretical study of wind loads and mechanical performance analysis of heliostats [J]. Solar Energy, 2014, 105: 48-57

[14] BlackmonJ B. Heliostat drive unit design considerations-site wind load effects on projected fatigue life and safety factor [J]. Solar Energy, 2014, 105: 170-180

[15] DavenportA GThe relationship of wind structures to wind loading [R], 196554-102

[16] ZhangX-tingCalculation of structural wind pressure and wind vibration [M], 1985ShanghaiTongji University Press

[17] GB50009-2012. Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the PRC. load code for the design of building structures [S]. 2012. (in Chinese)

[18] European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Technical Committee. T12: Wind effects recommendations for the calculation of wind effects on buildings and structures [S]. 1978.

[19] DemlM, WunderlichW. Direct evaluation of the “worst” imperfection shape in shell buckling [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1997, 149: 201-222

[20] ChenX, ShenS-zhao. Complete load-deflection response and initial imperfection analysis of single-layer lattice dome [J]. International Journal of Space Structures, 1993, 8(4): 271-278

[21] American Institute of Steel Construction. ANSI/AISC, No. 360-05 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings[S]. 2005.

[22] ZhiX-d, FanF, ShenS-zhao. Elasto-plastic instability of single-layer reticulated shells under dynamic actions [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2010, 48: 837-845

[23] BUDIANSKY B, ROTH R S. Axisymmetric dynamic buckling of clamped shallow spherical shells [R]. Washington D C: NASA, 1962.

[24] VamvatsikosD, CornellC A. Incremental dynamic analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamic, 2002, 31(3): 491-514

[25] VersteegH K, MalalasekeraWAn introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method [M], 2007New JerseyPrentice Hall

[26] PeterkaJ A, DericksonR GWind load design methods for ground-based heliostats and parabolic dish collectors [R], 1992ColoradoColorado State University

[27] RahmanS M, HassanT, CoronaE. Evaluation of cyclic plasticity models in ratcheting simulation of straight pipes under cyclic bending and steady internal pressure [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2008, 24(10): 1756-1791

[28] FordeW R B, StiemerS F. Improved arc length orthogonality methods for nonlinear finite element analysis [J]. Computers and Structures, 1987, 27(5): 625-630

[29] LiJ-h, LiC-xiang. Development of numerical simulations for stochastic wind fields in civil engineering [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2008, 27(9): 116-125

[30] OwenJ S, EcclesB J, ChooB S, WoodingsM A. The application of auto-regressive time series modelling for the timefrequency analysis of civil engineering structures [J]. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23: 521-536

[31] IannuzziA, SpinelliP. Artificial wind generation and structural response [J]. Journal of Structure Engineering, 1987, 113(12): 2382-2398

[32] LiY-q, TamuraY. Nonlinear dynamic analysis for large-span single-layer reticulated shells subjected to wind loading [J]. Wind and Structures, 2005, 8(1): 35-48

[33] CuttingF M. Heliostat survivability and structural stability for wind loading [C]. Alternative Energy Sources, 1978Washington D CHemisphere Publishing Corp463-525