Limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumed stress on slip surface

Dong-ping Deng , Lian-heng Zhao , Liang Li

Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 2972 -2983.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 2972 -2983. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-016-3361-0
Geological, Civil, Energy and Traffic Engineering

Limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumed stress on slip surface

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In the limit equilibrium framework, two- and three-dimensional slope stabilities can be solved according to the overall force and moment equilibrium conditions of a sliding body. In this work, based on Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) strength criterion and the initial normal stress without considering the inter-slice (or inter-column) forces, the normal and shear stresses on the slip surface are assumed using some dimensionless variables, and these variables have the same numbers with the force and moment equilibrium equations of a sliding body to establish easily the linear equation groups for solving them. After these variables are determined, the normal stresses, shear stresses, and slope safety factor are also obtained using the stresses assumptions and M-C strength criterion. In the case of a three-dimensional slope stability analysis, three calculation methods, namely, a non-strict method, quasi-strict method, and strict method, can be obtained by satisfying different force and moment equilibrium conditions. Results of the comparison in the classic two- and three-dimensional slope examples show that the slope safety factors calculated using the current method and the other limit equilibrium methods are approximately equal to each other, indicating the feasibility of the current method; further, the following conclusions are obtained: 1) The current method better amends the initial normal and shear stresses acting on the slip surface, and has the identical results with using simplified Bishop method, Spencer method, and Morgenstern-Price (M-P) method; however, the stress curve of the current method is smoother than that obtained using the three abovementioned methods. 2) The current method is suitable for analyzing the two- and three-dimensional slope stability. 3) In the three-dimensional asymmetric sliding body, the non-strict method yields safer solutions, and the results of the quasi-strict method are relatively reasonable and close to those of the strict method, indicating that the quasi-strict method can be used to obtain a reliable slope safety factor.

Keywords

two-dimensional slope / three-dimensional slope / limit equilibrium analysis / normal stress / shear stress / safety factor

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dong-ping Deng, Lian-heng Zhao, Liang Li. Limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumed stress on slip surface. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(11): 2972-2983 DOI:10.1007/s11771-016-3361-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

LiuS Y, ShaoL T, LiH J. Slope stability analysis using the limit equilibrium method and two finite element methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2005, 63(1): 291-298

[2]

ChengY M, LansivaaraT, WeiW B. Two-dimensional slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium and strength reduction methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2007, 34(3): 137-150

[3]

WeiW B, ChengY M, LiL. Three-dimensional slope failure analysis by the strength reduction and limit equilibrium methods [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(1): 70-80

[4]

ZhuJ F, ChenC F. Search for circular and noncircular critical slip surfaces in slope stability analysis by hybrid genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(1): 387-397

[5]

TahaM R, KhajehzadehM, EslamiM. A new hybrid algorithm for global optimization and slope stability evaluation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(11): 3265-3273

[6]

LamL, FredlundD G. A general limit equilibrium model for three-dimensional slope stability analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1993, 30(6): 905-919

[7]

ChengY M, YipC J. Three-dimensional asymmetrical slope stability analysis extension of Bishop’s, Janbu’s, and Morgenstern–Price’s techniques [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(122): 1544-1555

[8]

ZhouX P, ChengH. Analysis of stability of three-dimensional slopes using the rigorous limit equilibrium method [J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 160(27): 21-33

[9]

FredlundD G, KrahnJ. Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 14(3): 429-439

[10]

LeshchinskyD, BakerR, SilverM L. Three dimensional analysis of slope stability [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1985, 9(3): 199-223

[11]

ZhuD Y, LeeC F, JiangH D. Generalized framework of limit equilibrium methods for slope stability analysis [J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(4): 377-395

[12]

BellJ M. General slope stability analysis [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94: 1253-1270

[13]

ZhuD Y, LeeC F. Explicit limit equilibrium solution for slope stability [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2002, 26(15): 1573-1590

[14]

ZhengH, ThamL G. Improved Bell’s method for the stability analysis of slopes [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2009, 33(14): 1673-1689

[15]

ZhuD Y, DingX L, DuJ H, DengJ H. Computation of 3D safety factor of asymmetric and rotational slopes [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 29(8): 1236-1239

[16]

ZhuD Y, DingX L, LiuH L, QianQ H. Method of three-dimensional stability analysis of a symmetrical slope [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(1): 22-27

[17]

ZhuD Y, QianQ H. Rigorous and quasi-rigorous limit equilibrium solutions of 3D slope stability and application to engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(8): 1513-1528

[18]

Rocscience Inc.Slide verification manual [M], 2003TorontoRocscience Inc8-118

[19]

DengD P, LiL, ZhaoL H. A new method of sliding surface searching for general stability of slope based on Janbu method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 891-898

[20]

ZhangX. Three-dimensional stability analysis of concave slopes in plan view [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1988, 114(6): 658-671

[21]

DengD P, LiL, ZhaoL H. A new method for searching sliding surface of three-dimensional homogeneous soil slope [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29: 3719-3727

[22]

WangY X, DengH K. An improved method for three-dimensional slope stability analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(5): 611-614

[23]

HovlandH JThree-dimensional slope stability analysis method [M], 1997, 103(9): 971-986

[24]

HungrO. An extension of Bishop’s simplified method of slope stability analysis to three dimensions [J]. Geotechnique, 1987, 37(1): 113-117

[25]

HungrO, SalgadoF M, ByrneP M. Evaluation of a three-dimensional method of slope stability analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26(4): 679-686

[26]

ChenC F, ZhuJ FA three-dimensional slope stability analysis procedure based Morgenstern-Price method [M], 2010, 29(7): 1473-1480

[27]

DengD P, LiL. Quasi-rigorous and non-rigorous 3D limit equilibrium methods for generalized-shaped slopes [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(3): 501-511

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

172

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/