Improved Sobel algorithm for defect detection of rail surfaces with enhanced efficiency and accuracy

Abstract

A more effective and accurate improved Sobel algorithm has been developed to detect surface defects on heavy rails. The proposed method can make up for the mere sensitivity to X and Y directions of the Sobel algorithm by adding six templates at different directions. Meanwhile, an experimental platform for detecting surface defects consisting of the bed-jig, image-forming system with CCD cameras and light sources, parallel computer system and cable system has been constructed. The detection results of the backfin defects show that the improved Sobel algorithm can achieve an accurate and efficient positioning with decreasing interference noises to the defect edge. It can also extract more precise features and characteristic parameters of the backfin defect. Furthermore, the BP neural network adopted for defects classification with the inputting characteristic parameters of improved Sobel algorithm can obtain the optimal training precision of 0.0095827 with 106 iterative steps and time of 3 s less than Sobel algorithm with 146 steps and 5 s. Finally, an enhanced identification rate of 10% for the defects is also confirmed after the Sobel algorithm is improved.

Keywords

Sobel algorithm / surface defect / heavy rail / experimental platform / identification

References

[1] ZhengR, LiuZ, LuY-f, ZhuL-x, SunX-fang. Multi-frequency least squares demodulation method in electromagnetic rail inspection. IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques, 2013363-365

[2] MunozJ M C, MarquezF P G, PapaeliasM. Railroad inspection based on ACFM employing a non-uniform B-spline approach [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 40(2): 605-617

[3] MiZ-z, XieZ-jiang. Theoretical and experimental research on the defects of hot rolled heavy rail [J]. Metalurgia International, 2012, 17(9): 221-225

[4] Khodayari-RostamabadA, ReillyJ P, NikolovaN K, HareJ R, PashaS. Machine learning techniques for the analysis of magnetic flux leakage images in pipeline inspection [J]. IEEE Transaction on Magnetic, 2009, 45(8): 3073-3084

[5] LeiH-m, TianG-yun. Broken wire detection in coated steel belts using the magnetic flux leakage method [J]. Insight, 2013, 55(3): 126-131

[6] RamosH G, RochaT, KralJ, PasadasD, RibeiroA L. An SVM approach with electromagnetic methods to assess metal plate thickness [J]. Measurement, 2014, 54: 201-206

[7] KhalidA R, PailyR. FPGA implementation of high speed and low power architectures for image segmentation using Sobel operators [J]. Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers, 2012, 21(7): 125005

[8] CaiJ-h, HuW-wen. Feature extraction of gear fault signal based on Sobel operator and WHT [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2013, 20(3): 551-559

[9] AbbasiT A, AbbasiM U. A novel FPGA-based architecture for Sobel edge detection operator [J]. Internatinal Journal of Electronics, 2007, 94(9): 889-896

[10] WangZ-j, HuangX-diao. Visual positioning of rectangular lead components based on Harris corners and Zernike moments [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(7): 2586-2595

[11] ZhangQ, YangH, WeiY-guang. Selection of destination ports of inland-port-transferring RHCTS based on sea-rail combined container transportation. 3rd International Symposium on Innovation and Sustainability of Modern Railway, 2012BeijingScience Press675-680

[12] CaoS-q, ChenW-m, ZhangHong. An integration method for edge detection [J]. Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2011, 2: 243-249

[13] ZhangH, ZhuQ-p, FanC-e, DengD-xiang. Image quality assessment based on Prewitt magnitude [J]. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 2013, 67(9): 799-803

[14] PandeyM. Different operator using in edge detection for image processing [J]. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology Research, 2014, 4(1): 57-61

[15] Medina-CarnicerR, Munoz-SalinasR, YeguasbolivarE, Diaz-MasL. A novel method to look for the hysteresis thresholds for the Canny edge detector [J]. Pattern Recognition, 2011, 44(6): 1201-1211

[16] PanettaK A, AgaianS S, NercessianS C, AlmunstashriA A. Shape-dependent canny edge detector [J]. Optical Engineering, 2011, 50(8): 087008

[17] JiaX-f, ZhaoB-t, ZhouM-r, ChenZ-quan. An edge-adaptive demosaicking method based on image correlation [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(4): 1397-1404

[18] GuoY-wen. Adaptive preprocessing algorithms of corneal topography in polar coordinate system [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(12): 4571-4576

[19] MartiniM G, HewageC, VillariniB. Image quality assessment based on edge preservation [J]. Signal Processing-Image Communication, 2012, 27(8): 875-882

[20] ZhaoJ-y, XuY-l, JiaoY-bin. The fast arithmetic study of image edge detection based on the order morphology [J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2008, 36(11): 2195-2199

[21] ZhaoZ-g, WanJ-na. New method for image edge detection based on gradient and zero crossing [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2006, 27(8): 821-824

[22] ZhengY-j, ZhangY-h, WangZ-w, ZhangJ, FanS-juan. Edge detection algorithm based on the eight directions sobel operator [J]. Computer Science A, 2013, 40(11): 354-356

[23] LiuY-jiongResearch on imaging optimization and depth information extraction of steel plate surface defects based on image processing [D], 2011WuhanWuhan University of Science and Technology

[24] WangW-yuan. Selecting the optimal gaussian filtering scale via the SNR of image [J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31(10): 2483-2487